Sunday, January 24, 2016

Building Gun-Handling Expertise

Repetition and habit | Cornered Cat:

Not long ago, I saw a guy at a gun store take an “unloaded” gun and absent-mindedly press its muzzle against his own left palm as he pressed the trigger while he was talking to the clerk. I have no idea what he thought he was doing. But what he was actually doing was reinforcing a dangerous habit of not paying attention to or caring about where the gun was pointed. That habit could (and very likely will!) reach up and bite him some day — and when it does, he will also likely join the ranks of many, many people who say stuff like, “Well if you just check to be sure it’s unloaded…” But the problem isn’t the loaded or unloaded status of the gun. It’s the deeply built-in bad habit that was caused by repeatedly doing something dangerous with the gun until that motion became something the shooter did without conscious thought. It became a habit.
This is a topic which deserves as much attention as possible, and it's headlined by the story of an incident which sounds very familiar to me.

Fifty plus years ago, my sister's boyfriend (now and for a long time my much beloved brother-in-law) came to the family home to visit her.  She had some things to do, so she left him alone to amuse himself.  He did so by walking into my room (I was out of the house), picking up my .22 caliber CO2-powered pellet gun, and shooting himself in the hand with it.  (Note that the pellet gun wasn't COCKED when I left it there, but there was a pellet in the chamber.)

Apparently, he just wanted to see how powerful the "PUFF" was, so he cocked the gun, pushed the muzzle against the palm of his hand and pulled the trigger.

Not only was the CO2 charge of air more powerful than he expected (it was a new cartridge, fully charged) but it put the pellet clear through his hand.   He cried out, my sister took him to the hospital, and he got a bandage and some antiseptic.

Later, he told me what had happened and said:

"I just couldn't BELIEVE that you would leave a loaded gun laying around the house!"

(In other words, it was my fault.  And BTW, I was the youngest person in the house, and the pellet gun was in my bedroom, and he had no permission to be messing with "my stuff".)

In response, I told him that "THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A LOADED GUN!"

also, "you're older than I am, you should be more responsible. And I hope you learned something from this and never fuck around with my shit again because the next time ....".  (Thankfully I never finished that sentence.)

The lesson, of course, is that smart people do stupid things.

I still keep loaded guns in my house, but I'm the only one here, and when I have visitors I warn them that there are loaded guns and to please keep their booger hook off the bang switch or else they will bleed.  And yes, I don't that many visitors.


WHICH LEADS ME TO THE OTHER HALF OF THIS TOPIC:

Last Summer I was competing at a USPSA match locally, and a fellow who had only been involved in the sport for a month or so came to sit beside me and ask for advice.

He asked how he could make it faster to load a fresh magazine, because (as I had taught him when he attended my "Introduction To USPSA" safety class a couple of months earlier), reloads are one of the biggest time-wasters in a sport which equates time-elapsed with accuracy of the shots.

I had already noticed, when observing his performance in two previous stages in the match, that he would shoot until his pistol ran out of ammunition.  It always seemed to take him by surprise, and he wasted several valuable seconds discovering that he had to reload, processing the information, and deciding what to do next.

NOTE: We had already discussed this in the class, but he apparently was not listening because the information seemed not to be pertinent.  However, now that he was actively competing, he had learned the lesson the hard way ... Time Matters in IPSC competition.  And he wanted to improve his performance.

We talked for a while.  I noted that shooting to slide-lock was inefficient.  I suggested that he plan out his stage performance before he actually began to shoot the stage, by planning when and how to engage each array and (not incidentally) determining WHEN he would reload a new magazine when he was performing another "time-wasting" activity ... usually, when moving from one shooting position to the next.

I also suggested that this was one of the gun-handling skills which he might practice, to his benefit, and that he already knew how to reload the next magazine ... he only needed to pre-plan his 'game plan' for each match stage, and be sure to walk through the stage so he could program his short-memory game plan and he didn't have to THINK about what to do next when he was in actual "competition mode".

That is:  (a) learn the skills of efficiently reloading a new, full magazine into your pistol; and
(b) at the pre-determined "reload points", go ahead and reload even though you may not really need to do so 'yet', but you have "dead Time" and you can do so without penalty.  (EG: You're moving during that phase, and while you are moving you can reload without wasting time.)

He nodded his head.  Did whatever he hear make an impression on him?

No, he did not. For the rest of the match, he continued to shoot to "slide lock" and then spend from 3 to 7 seconds reacting, and then reloading, and (usually, because he had gone to 'slide lock') racking his slide to load the next round in the newly reloaded magazine.

That man never came back to compete again.  Probably, because he allowed himself to become  inundated with "information overload".    The skills which he might have learned during the class seemed unimportant to him; but in 'real life' (during a match competition) he discovered that he had failed to develop important skills .... and he just shut down, rather than learn from the negative experience and IMMEDIATELY attempt to incorporate new information into his game plan.

Lessons Learned:

After 30+ years of competition, and 10+ of teaching, I have learned that you can never have too much training, or too much experience.

Too much ammunition, or too many magazines.

That is why I carry much more ammunition, in many more magazines, than I could possibly "need" to complete a stage exercise.  I may lose a magazine; I may flub a reload; I may have inadvertently 'short-loaded" a magazine, and need to do more reloads than I had expected.

During  competition, I may experience a jam; the best way to clear it is to drop the magazine (perhaps rack the slide to clear the chamber) and load a new magazine.  If you don't  have an extra magazine, you are reduced to bending over to retrieve a previously loaded magazine.  This is time wasted.

Note that this does not only apply to Competition: it also applies to self-defense.  Except that in self-defense, you not only lose time, you may lose your life because people are active engaging (SHOOTING AT!) you.

I USE TO COMPETE in "Open Class", where I had the luxury of using magazines which would  hold 18, even 26 rounds of ammunition.

Now I compete in "Limited Ten" class, where I can have no more than ten rounds in my magazine.

This teaches me to plan reloads ... expect them ... and always be prepared for a situation which doesn't fit my "Game Plan"

Self Defense:

This approach is applicable to Self Defense.   If you expect to have 20+ rounds available to you in competition, you will expect (even if subconsciously) to have that many rounds available to you In Real Life (IRL).  So, unless your "home defense firearm" is going to be a pistol with a very large capacity magazine, there is no problem.  With experience in Competition, you will learn to intuitively know when your magazine is low on ammunition, and you will change to a new, fresh, fully loaded magazine without even thinking about it.  That's A Good Thing!  You will learn to keep track of your ammunition expenditure subconsciously, and when you begin to feel fretful that you are low on ammunition you will perform a reload without consciously thinking about it.  When it is convenient, of course, and when it does not expose you to return fire in a defensive situation.

But if you train to expect no more than 7 or 8 rounds (as when you are shooting a single-stack pistol of the 1911 variety), you will learn to keep track of your rounds-expended (if subconsciously) and automatically perform a reload from your reserve supply of ammunition when it is appropriate.

There is no substitute for Practical Experience.
The old saying "Train Like You Will Fight"  and fight like you train .... is an eternal verity; it's always true, and if you follow that guideline you may still go wrong.
But those .. unexpected surprises ... are more likely to happen as if you train (compete) to have  25 rounds in your gun and are surprised when you shoot eight rounds and your gun goes to slide-lock .. unexpectedly.

Train to have 8 rounds in your gun, if that's the reality, and fight to reload every time you can.  And have LOTS of extra magazines, and LOTS of extra ammunition.  (and never lose track of a magazine  that isn't completely "empty" .. one or two rounds can made a lot of difference in the resolution of a gunfight.)

There's an old saying that "IPSC CAN GET YOU KILLED"
That's bullshit.

IPSC will teach you safe, fast, reliable intuitive responses to a variety of surprising situations.

But you still need to be aware of cover and concealment, retention of partially-expended magazines, and round-count in all of its manifestations.

It's a jungle out there.

Be the evilest man in the valley.  And survive.

Trumpiness Trumps Trump

Two weeks ago I wrote:

I do NOT like Donald Trump.  I'm outraged that this is the best candidate the Republicans can find....
I like everyone else on the Republican Report Card even less, because they seem like children.  ON ONE HAND, Trump is at least a grown up and understands money .... I'm just not sure that this is the same thing as being "a viable candidate" or "presidential timbre" (whatever that means).On the other hand, everyone who seems to be campaigning for the Democratic Nomination is so extreme that they make Trump seem rational.
I take it back.
Nothing can make Trump seem rational.

Now, I'm willing to settle for "not evil" (which lets Hillary out of the running).

But I'm not willing to give up the "Trainwreck" theme, as Trumps Billions have created an egomaniacal  monster ... (should I have said "megalomaniacal"?  I always seem to get those two mixed up) ... whose self-love is only exceeded by his disdain for any opinion other than his own.

Which puts him squarely in the same category as Obama, only with more money and more power.

So it would appear that there are NO candidates for President of the United States.  Rubio and that other guy whose name I can't remember have assumed the back seat, apparently hoping to be tagged for the VP spot when the country votes FOR The Donald and AGAINST The Hillary (who is soon to be wearing prison blues anyway;  I wonder how Trump engineered that one.)


Remember "I Have A Dream"?


That was probably the most powerful speech ever given during the 20th century.  I would have voted for that man.

Compare that with this:



While I'm opposed to unrestricted immigration, this ad makes my teeth hurt.

So, I will officially oppose Donald Pouty-Lips as soon as I find a Republican who can beat Hillary Clinton.

Any suggestions?

Anybody?

What we NEED is another Abraham Lincoln, not another pampered Billionaire

Will The Patriarch Of American Gun Control Jump Into The 2016 Race?:
Michael Bloomberg, the billionaire former mayor of New York City, has told his aides to draw up plans for an independent campaign for the U.S. presidency, according to a source familiar with the situation. Bloomberg has advised friends and associates that he would be willing to spend at least $1 billion of his own money on a campaign for the November 2016 election, according to the source, who spoke on condition on anonymity to discuss the former mayor’s thinking.
Trump vs Bloomberg?
Please allow me to be the first to say this:


A pox on BOTH their houses!


It has come down to this; that someone seems bound to buy the Presidency.
And both of the choices are enough to gag a maggot.

Pompous pop-in-jays, the both of them.

Almost .... not quite but almost ... Clinton is beginning to seem "the lesser of two weevils".

So here's the latest campaign slogan:

FREE HILLARY!
(yuck!)

Dear ATF: Bite Me

ATF: New Rule On Gun Sellers Will Be Handled On A 'Case By Case' Basis | The Daily Caller:
January 20, 2016
LAS VEGAS — The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) insists the agency will enforce President Barack Obama’s new executive actions “on a case by case basis.” Obama issued several executive actions pertaining to firearms earlier in the month. The ATF will start enforcing a rule any person selling firearms from a store, a gun shows, or online must have a Federal Firearms License (FFL) and conduct background checks. The administration stressed that there is no “specific threshold number of firearms purchased or sold that triggers the licensure requirement.” An ATF representative told The Daily Caller at the SHOT Show Tuesday, “It depends on how much you’re doing it and there’s no line. There’s no bright line number.”
(emphasis added)

Dear ATF:
I'm sorry, you have to do better than that.
I know I'm fairly ignorant about the law, but I do know the meaning of "Ex Post Pacto".

That means that if it's not against the law when I perform an action, I can't be held accountable for "illegal" actions which were not illegal before I do the action.

So if I go sell three guns at a gun show, as a private citizen, I haven't broken a law.
If I sell a dozen guns, I still haven't broken a law.
Because I'm not operating a business ... I'm just liquidating my private assets.

So if YOU ... BATF Agent that you are ... arbitrarily decide that I'm "operating a business" because I sold more than x-number of firearms during an hour, a day, a weekend ... you can't prosecute me for it until you determine what the "Bright Line Number" is.

Idiots.

This is a brand new concept that your bosses ...you know, the guys on the 7th floor? ... just dreamed up and now you have to work with it. Right?

SUCKS to be you.  If you could get A Real Job, you wouldn't have to be trying to figure out what your GOVERNMENTAL job is.

You know, there are rules, and there are laws.  One of the common characteristics of both RULES and LAWS is that there has to be some measure of default.

For example:

Washington State Lawmakers condemn homeowners to non-defensible condition

Washington State Lawmakers Push Gun Storage Law, 'Assault Weapons' Ban - Breitbart:
On January 22 Washington state lawmakers held a hearing on a proposal to requirement gun owners in the state to lock up their guns in the home.
 This comes just under two weeks after state representative Jim Moeller (D-49th) introduced legislation to ban the possession of the “assault weapons” in the state. According to The News Tribune, Rep. Ruth Kagi (D-Lake Forest Park) spoke for requiring law-abiding citizens to lock up their guns in their homes. Kagi said, “Requiring gun owners to safely store firearms is common sense.” She added, “About 1 million households in Washington state contain unsafe firearms, and the children in those homes are at risk.
Details not yet clear, but this sounds like a blanket indictment of the individual ability to keep protective firearms immediately at hand.

The Liberal mantra "It's For The CHILLLLLLLDRENNNNN" rings loud and clear here.   The thought that firearms might also be used to protect children is ignored ... as is the thought that these firearms need to be readily available.

Saturday, January 23, 2016

Top 25 Most-Stolen Passwords of 2015

See the Top 25 Most-Stolen Passwords of 2015 | TheBlaze.com:

Here’s DataSplash’s top 25 stolen passwords of 2015 (change from 2014 noted in parentheses):

1. 123456 (Unchanged)
2. password (Unchanged)
3. 12345678 (Up 1)
4. qwerty (Up 1)
5. 12345 (Down 2)
6. 123456789 (Unchanged)
7. football (Up 3)
8. 1234 (Down 1)
9. 1234567 (Up 2)
10. baseball (Down 2)
11. welcome (New)
12. 1234567890 (New)
13. abc123 (Up 1)
14. 111111 (Up 1)
15. 1qaz2wsx (New)
16. dragon (Down 7)
17. master (Up 2)
18. monkey (Down 6)
19. letmein (Down 6)
20. login (New)
21. princess (New)
22. qwertyuiop (New)
23. solo (New)
24. passw0rd (New)
25. starwars (New)

 (H/T: New York Post)

Assault on the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act ... worth the read

Democrats attempt to set legal framework to sue the gun industry out of existence  
(January 21, 2016)

Interesting read about the PLCAA: worth the time.

Well, most of the Democratic 2016 field supports this, as do anti-gun activists, so it’s no surprise that some members of Congress are trying to gut the 
Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act  in 2005 (via the Hill): Hot Air

... ask rather what you can do TO your country ....

Senator Wants To Avoid 'Constitutional Arguments' On Guns | The Daily Caller:

Maryland Sen. Barbara Mikulski said at a Senate hearing Wednesday that she wanted to avoid getting “involved in constitutional arguments.” The only problem is that the hearing in question dealt with President Obama’s recent executive actions on guns, which many believe infringes on Americans’ Second Amendment rights.
“I look forward to…listening to the attorney general and listening to this wonderful panel that you’ve invited to participate today,” Mikulski, a Democrat and ardent supporter of gun control, said in her opening remarks ahead of a Senate Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Subcommittee hearing, which heard testimony from Attorney General Loretta Lynch. “So let’s solve the problem,” Mikuski urged. “Let’s not get involved in constitutional arguments, and let’s help our American people be safe and secure in their home, their neighborhood, their school and their house of worship.” Earlier this month, Obama announced that his administration will force more gun sellers — even low-volume sellers — to obtain licenses and to conduct background checks. The initiative, which was developed in part by Lynch, expands the category of gun sellers considered to be “in the business” of selling firearms.
UNADDRESSED ISSUES:

  • SECOND AMENDMENT A KEY ITEM IN THE CONSTITUTION
  • DIFFICULTY OF NON-DEALERS TO OBTAIN DEALER LICENSES UNDER BATF RULES
  • "DEALER" AN IMPERFECTLY DEFINED TERMINOLOGY
  • IDIOTS IN CONGRESS 
  • EXECUTIVE ACTIONS
  • DEFINING "THE PROBLEM" WHICH NEEDS TO BE "SOLVED"

The Walrus is Paul

5.11 Releases Tactical Yoga Pants | Armory Blog:

Yoga pants are among the greatest inventions of all time, but what could make them better? Tactical versions of course! 5.11 released their own line of tactical range capri pants. They include wide belt loops for tactical belts and abrasian panels to protect against wear. Now I know what the get the misses for Christmas.
Please.  No.
Not now.
Not ever.

Shop in a "Gun Free Zone"? You may have legal options in case of injury:

Bill allows suits over gun-free zone incidents:

Sponsored by (Tennesee State) Sen. Dolores Gresham, R-Somerville, Senate Bill 1736 has a very specific purpose. “It is the intent of this section to balance the right of a handgun carry permit holder to carry a firearm in order to exercise the right of self-defense and the ability of a property owner or entity in charge of the property to exercise control over governmental or private property,” the bill states. 
 To accomplish that goal, the legislation allows any Tennessean with a valid gun permit to sue a property owner in the event of injury or death provided the incident occurred while in a gun-free zone. The legislation places responsibility on the business or property owner of the gun-free area to protect the gun owner from any incidents that occur with any “invitees,” trespassers and employees found on the property, as well as vicious and wild animals and “defensible man-made and natural hazards.” The bill does not define defensible man-made and natural hazards.
(NOTE: Also cited by bloggers "Conservative Tribune" and "GunsnFreedom", both of which  deserve credit for originally referencing this article.)

The legal option (in this unique Tennessee Bill) to sue only applies to legal gun owners who have a carry permit and were prohibited from carrying on the premises because of the property owners' posted restrictions.

OPINION:
I'm of two minds about this.

First, I rarely patronize any business which has a "no guns" sign posted;  if they don't trust me, I don't trust them.  Their business, their choice.  My money, I get to choose to whom I give it.   So, generally speaking, I don't care.


Second, this establishes an aggressive response to gun-free businesses, and because I'm a mild mannered person I choose non-aggression whenever I have a choice.

On the other hand, I don't patronize their businesses, I have no say in their business decisions, and I've already voted against them by refusing to do business with them.   Well, perhaps a certain degree of passive-aggression in that I respect their decision and take my business to people who trust me.

OH! WAIT A MINUTE!

Thursday, January 21, 2016

Too Serious: Need ... Comic .... Relief!

I've been concerned that my recent posts have been so frigging NEGATIVE, serious, and no f*ing fun at ALL.

JUST when I thought I would have to make something up, Clayton Cramer came along and saved my soul.  (Thank you Kind Sir!)

Clayton Cramer.: More Reminders That Our Public Universities Need Some Serious Oversight:

A teacher at the University of North Carolina-Greensboro requires students in her class to write an 8-page commitment to social justice — pupils who take her class because it’s a required course to earn a K-12 teaching credential. An assignment in instructor Revital Zilonka’s “Institution of Education” class tells future North Carolina teachers that “by the end of the semester, you are required to write your own personal/professional commitment to social justice,” the syllabus states. The class mandates a list of feminist and Marxist readings, and students’ “commitment” is expected to be up to eight pages long and delve into how they plan to advance social justice “given the new understanding you have by now about society and education,” the syllabus adds
"Institution of Education" .. man, I wish I had been able to take THAT class back in the 60's!
It sounds like an "Easy 'A'", if you can suck up to the prof!

(On the other hand, it might be less demeaning to just stand on the corner under a street light and solicit lonely men who can't get a date.)



A "commitment to Social Justice" is probably exactly what it sounds like:
You Will Commit To The Party Line, Or We Have Ways To Make You Talk!


  Zilonka’s undergraduate class is one of seven sections of “ELC 381, The Institution of Education” taught at the public university this spring. The course is required for students seeking to earn a K-12 teaching credential, but additional professors teach it besides Zilonka, and scholars can shape it toward their specific interests. Zilonka’s syllabus also tells students to Like on Facebook a slate of secular-progressive pages, such as the pro-LGBTQ Human Rights Campaign, Feministing, Million Hoodies for Justice, and the Brown Girl Collective. If you live in North Carolina, you might want to ask your legislators if this sort of indoctrination is an appropriate use of state funds.

Okay, *-I-* thought it was funny!

Fast and Furious .. The final chapter? Probably not!

Judge rules against Justice Dept. in Fast and Furious fight | Fox News:

A federal judge has rejected the Justice Department's claim of executive privilege used to withhold documents tied to the Fast and Furious "gun-walking" scandal from release to a congressional committee.

Just thought you would like to know.

That is all.

The Melting Pot: The Rant

Katie Pavlich: What real rape culture looks like | TheHill:

“A growing number of women and young girls housed in refugee shelters in Germany are being raped, sexually assaulted and even forced into prostitution by male asylum seekers, according to German social work organizations with first-hand knowledge of the situation. ... Conditions for women and girls at some shelters are so perilous that females are being described as ‘wild game’ fighting off Muslim male predators. But many victims, fearing reprisals, are keeping silent, social workers say,” Gatestone Fellow Soeren Kern wrote. “At the same time, growing numbers of German women in towns and cities across the country are being raped by asylum seekers from Africa, Asia and the Middle East. Many of the crimes are being downplayed by German authorities and the national media, apparently to avoid fueling anti-immigration sentiments.”


Pavlich, after quoting that statement from the Gatestone Institute, added her own opinion:

In Norway, The New York Times recently reported on government-funded classes being held for asylum seekers. The classes are being held in an effort to teach men new to the country that rape is wrong and unacceptable in their new culture.
“ ‘The goal is that participants will ‘at least know the difference between right and wrong,’ said Nina Machibya, the Sandnes center’s manager,” the paper reported. “A course manual sets out a simple rule that all asylum seekers need to learn and follow: ‘To force someone into sex is not permitted in Norway, even when you are married to that person.’ ”
As I’ve said before, if you have to educate an entire influx of Muslim men about how rape is wrong, you probably shouldn’t be letting them into your country at all. 

I've talked about the bowlderization of America before, although not under this kind of hashtag.

But obviously it isn't "just" happening here, but across the national lines of Civilized Europe as well.  Well .. perhaps we should consider The Mother Countries to be "Not-So Civilized Europe" now.

gunbloggers dot com

It's about that time of the year when I make my annual post about GUNBLOGGERS.

Gunbloggers.com is an amalgamation (can I say that here?) of posts from a plethora (I know I can say THAT .. I can even spell it!) of people who blog about firearms.  In includes ... oh hell, me and Ammoland and David Correa and John Lott and a bunch of other folks who have interesting things to say.

Okay, so I don't always have something interesting to say ... but I always have something to say anyway.

So if you're tired of trying to page through this blog every few days looking for something (anything!) of substance, you should go there first.

I'm there, because sometimes the good folks at GBDC (I made that up just now) experience a slow news day and they'll grab anything that might remotely be of interest.

This is where I go first when I wake up in the morning and want to see what's going on in the world.

Note:  Sometimes it's kind of scary.  Welcome to America in the 21st Century!

No Problem; We have an APP for that!

NY school says offer to 'change' student grades made to protect kids | Fox News:

A private Jewish school in New York got bad marks from online critics after sending home report cards - along with a letter offering a rosier set of grades for kids' eyes only.
School officials at Yeshiva Ketana of Long Island say the Jan. 8 letter was not an offer to change real grades, but simply an option for parents to show their youngsters a more encouraging set.

Here's a thought.  Is it going to be a traumatic event for your child to receive the grade she or he actually deserves?

If you sent your child to the 'right' school, they'll send you a phony report card so that the lousy student looks really good, even though the  whole "education" thing isn't working.

What's more important? Should kids get an education, or should their ego be boosted even though they CAN'T LEARN SHIT?

(Note: this is not a test.  You are an adult, you can read the facts and make up your own mind.  Unfortunately, 20 years from now ... your child can not.)

(Note #2:  remember Democrats think we are stupid?   Just saying ....)

Democrats think we are stupid

John Lott has a new article at National Review today, which demonstrates the perfidy of Democrats in their never-ending story of trying to remove all Second Amendment rights from the American Public.

Democrats’ Semi-Automatic Gun Ban Is Clueless:
In the New York Times this month, Thomas Friedman called for “bans on the manufacture and sale of all semi-automatic and other military-style guns.” The city council of Lexington, Mass., is seeking to “ban the ownership of semi-automatic or fully automatic weapons able to hold ammunition clips containing more than ten rounds.”
 Well over half of the guns sold in the U.S. are semi-automatic. And, if a gun can accept a magazine, that magazine can be of pretty much any size. So the “ten round” rule is meaningless. So, with the exception of a few specialty guns, these rules would in effect ban all semi-automatic guns. This Democrat goal is nothing new, of course — in 1998, Illinois state senator Barack Obama supported a “ban on the sale or transfer of all forms of semi-automatic weapons” — but for years, gun-control advocates wanted to ban guns based on appearances. Now, instead of arbitrarily going after guns because of how they look, Democrats are at least being logically consistent and talking about banning guns based on how they function.
Go, read The Whole Thing.

Oh, and just in case you think that Revolvers are "less dreadful" than semi-automatic pistols, in terms of rounds fired downrange per second:

Introducing Jerry Miculek

O'Malley for president to "rebuild the American Dream!" (WTF?)

O'Malley uses Iowa gun show to call for reforms | The Gazette:
*(January 09, 2016)
CEDAR RAPIDS — Standing in front of one of the largest gun shows in Eastern Iowa Saturday morning, presidential hopeful Martin O’Malley called for gun safety legislation, saying such venues are the easiest places terrorists and criminals can obtain firearms.
The former Maryland Governor picked the three-day Hawkeye Downs gun show as his backdrop for a news conference to demand gun control, standing in freezing temperatures and praising President Barack Obama’s executive orders, but refused an invitation from event organizers to tour the facility. (emphasis added)
O'Malley's talking points are:
“You are standing at the easiest place in America for a psychopath, a murderer, or a terrorist to purchase a combat assault weapon, and that is a gun show in the United States of America,” he said, adding that ISIS tells its recruits gun shows are prime opportunities to score guns easily.
As gun show attendees drove behind him to enter the event, O’Malley promised that as president he’d build upon Obama’s recent gun control actions with a ban on combat assault weapons. Among other things, Obama’s orders require businesses that sell firearms obtain licenses to do so and conduct background checks on all potential buyers.
Okay.  So we have a Presidential candidate who is against guns, gun shows, firearms ownership and the Second Amendment in general.
Sounds like a "Shoo-in" to me; he's got MY vote!

(NOT!)


Well ... at least he's not a Hypocrite.

Tragedy in the home

Grandmother arrested in east New Orleans toddler's shooting death | NOLA.com:
(January 20, 2016)
A 42-year-old grandmother has been arrested in the shooting death of her 3-year-old grandson, killed early Wednesday (Jan. 20) inside her eastern New Orleans home. Investigators think Deonca Kennedy was sleeping in a bed with the toddler when a gun beneath her pillow discharged, striking the boy in the chest, the Police Department said.
This is an awful tragedy.  (Oh, damn .. is there any other kind?)

I can't imagine how the family is dealing with it.
The information available at this time is not sufficient to understand what happened.

But the way the story is presented, one can only assume that someone grasped the gun ... perhaps in their sleep ... and pulled the trigger.

(OR the gun "just went off" without the aid of any human intervention.  Which obviously could not be the case.)

There is a moral to this story, and that is that we who keep firearms in our homes need to be exceedingly careful about safe storage when children are present.

The "Gun Control" people are right about this.

Our children are too important.

And we are responsible for both our actions, and our "inactions".

When your kids and your guns are in the same room,
 you don't need sleep!

Wednesday, January 20, 2016

Totalitarianism

This is "Totalitarianism":

Inside Fallujah: ISIS-held ghost town ruled by fear, paranoia as battle looms | Fox News:
As in other parts of ISIS' sprawling caliphate, women suspected of adultery are beheaded and men believed to be homosexual are thrown from atop buildings. “All they need is for two witnesses to testify and say that this person has done something wrong and they get killed,” he said, adding that the accusation of adultery against a woman results in beheading. “So two bad people can make something up and have a person killed.”

Wow!  This is horrible!

Thankfully, this can NEVER happen in America!
We have a CONSTITUTION to protect us from The State.

Or do we?

In parts of America (notably California) gun owners can be "denounced" by family members, friends, acquaintances and even total strangers --- people who say that this person is a danger to himself or others and should not be allowed to purchase (or perhaps even possess) firearms.  

Tuesday, January 19, 2016

Happy "Confound Terry McAuliffe Day"! (sign here please)

Folks in Virginia are just as outraged by their state leaderships' arbitrary decision to NOT recognize out-of-state CHP holders as ... well, as you would be.  But there is a way to help them.
(BTW, this original post was published December, 2015 ... but there's still time to act!)


First, I’d like to offer an apology to our fellow CHP holders from the 25 states that are about to lose recognition from Virginia on February 1st 2016.
(There's still time to make your voice heard.)

Virginia Advice for Out-Of-State CHP HoldersYes, McAuliffe will probably veto it, but with your help, we will work to get as large a majority as possible to pass it. More on this in future legislative updates in January. In the meantime, here is a link to the bill:
 http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?161+ful+HB12
  There is a petition you can sign. Yes, Herring will ignore it, but it will make a great PR item, when I say something like, “X thousand of people signed a petition against Herring’s actions.” 7,283 have signed it so far and you guys are just learning about it! 
Here is the link:
http://tinyurl.com/pajlh9x    <;.... clicky place

 I am personally delighted to help inform pro-gun people how they can help defeat the EEEEVILE anti-gun movement.

That it would help confound Terry McAuliffe is just like getting Ice Cream on my cake.

Happy "Confound Terry McAuliffe Day"!

Monday, January 18, 2016

Brian Levin: Why the Oregon standoff matters - NY Daily News

Brian Levin: Why the Oregon standoff matters - NY Daily News: It is, and that’s what makes the anti-government Patriot movement to which Bundy and his adherents more menacing than it may at first glance appear. Anti-government extremists are emboldened by confrontations when the response is too lax, and enraged when met with force. For now, however, law enforcement is using the most prudent method to de-escalate — by waiting a bit. Ammon Bundy, who happily took over half-a-million dollars in loans from the federal government, was in an armed standoff in April 2014, along with “militia” supporters who blocked a state highway and confronted rangers enforcing a federal court order against his father for years of trespass on government land and refusal to pay grazing fees. Ammon also kicked a police dog and was tasered, while armed supporters pointed weapons at federal and local law enforcement. Two anti-government Bundy supporters, who were booted from the ranch area by the family, later went on two kill three, including two ambushed Las Vegas police officers. Ryan Payne, who boasted of coordinating snipers against law enforcement in the 2014 standoff is currently holed up with Ammon Bundy and his brother Ryan, along with firebrand John Ritzheimer. Ritzheimer, who belongs to a militia support group 3 Percenters, was kicked out of the far right-wing Oathkeepers after he announced his intention of arresting a U.S. senator for treason. Ritzheimer, who staged a large mosque protest and sometimes sports “F--k Islam” t-shirts, was the subject of an FBI warning to police. He had posted a video with a gun in which he stated he was going cross country to confront Muslim columnists who insulted him. RYAN BUNDY SAYS LOCALS SUPPORT OCCUPATION IN OREGON Whether or not the Oregon occupation fizzles, far-right-wing domestic extremism still represents a threat to the United States. Their insurrectionist view of the Second Amendment holds that an armed citizenry is honor-bound to violently overthrow the government when it becomes tyrannical, and they believe it has. Unfortunately, mainstream politics assist them by tolerating extremist conspiracy theories that previously would not see the light of day.

The right to "Feel Safe"

Joe at The View From North Central Idaho  posted another article from a momma's boy who wasn't willing to defend his family, and didn't want anyone else to do so, either.   The quote included:

I am officially beyond a place of wanting to find a compromise with those who want to argue for the right, or the need, of citizens to arm themselves with guns.
I looked at the Declaration of Independence, which (among other things) said something more important:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
Read the whole thing.   I couldn't find anything in the Declaration of Independence where it said that (a) you have a right to FEEL safe, or (b) anyone else has a duty to make you FEEL safe.

The Constitution, however, has this thing which acknowledges your right to defend yourself, but the momma's boy rejects it because the whole thing is distasteful to him.  After all, what are we spending our tax dollars on if it's not to make the momma's boys of the world FEEL safe?  (I ask you!)

Saturday, January 16, 2016

Yeah, like THAT is going to happen!

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Ordered to Pay $101M in Restitution to Boston Marathon Bombing Victims | NBC4 Washington:
Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has been ordered to pay $101 million in restitution to the victims of his crimes. The payment is due "forthwith". Penalty Phase in Boston Marathon Bombing Trial Set The restitution order came down today from Judge George O'Toole, who heard the case in early 2015. Tsarnaev faces the death penalty after a jury found him guilty and later sentenced him to death. 
Is this money going to be made available from his Legal Defense Fund?

Any fines associated with the case have been waived.
What I said.

Conspiracy Theory

Attorneys General to Discuss Regional Cooperation on Guns | NBC4 Washington:
 Attorneys general from Maryland, Virginia and the District of Columbia are getting together to talk about ways they can reduce gun violence in the region. Friday's first-of-its kind meeting in Washington will focus on illegal guns and ways the jurisdictions can work together to cut down on gun trafficking. All three attorneys general are Democrats who support gun control. Brian Frosh of Maryland, Mark Herring of Virginia and Karl Racine of the District will speak to reporters following their meeting.

 Published at 5:30 AM EST on Jan 15, 2016

"Major Nine"

Recent Comment:


"BTW, I need to discuss technical aspects of Major Power 9mm, can you email me @ ............@........."

It's interesting that I've received a couple of questions about "Major Nine" recently.

This is probably in reference to a dialogue I had with someone who wanted to discuss the question of 9mm Parabellum being legally definable as a "Major Power" cartridge in USPSA competition.


(Note: 9mm is usually classified as 'minor power', based on the velocity-to-bullet weight ration) by IPSC.    USPSA has allowed 9mm Parabellum to be classified is a "Major Power" cartridge, when it meets certain velocity/bullet-weight criteria as determined by a chronograph.   It's a little bit complicated, but there have been 'convincing' arguments presented that the 9mm can be loaded to much 'heavier' parameters SAFELY when fired in a modern pistol with a fully-supported chamber.)
The difference between "MAJOR" and "MINOR" power in USPSA/IPSC competition is that there are five scoring zones on the standard targets (both the "metric" and the "Classic" target, and they are:
A-zone .... always worth 5 points
B-zone and C-zone ... worth 4 points in major power and 3 points in minor power.
D-zone ... worth 2 points in major power and 1 point in minor power.

The question of MAJOR NINE is a little confusing, but it does allow people to shoot for higher hit-points with a 9mm pistol (if it has a fully supported barrel).

Personally, I'm not happy with the light-weight engineering of the 9mm Parabellum cartridge, but I can understand why some people would wish to work for higher hit-points by using this technical variation on the rules.

I do, however, think it's prone to abuse, and that developing a load which meets velocity standards for Major Power is an exercise which only very experienced reloaders should attempt.  Having said that, the corallary is that people with less experience, who are not as likely to develop a load for 9mm Major by baby-steps while testing each increment against a chronograph ... is a recipe for misadventure, at best.

Obama plans curbs on guns; but he (or the Liberal Press) is reluctant to define them!

Obama plans curbs on guns - The Washington Post: HONOLULU —
This is a complex issue, so this article is very long.
President Obama will press ahead with a set of executive actions on guns next week despite growing concerns in the United States over terrorism that have dampened some Americans’ enthusiasm for tighter firearms restrictions.

Reading through the reportage at the Washington Post, the first leg of the President's 3-legged stool for Gun Control seems to be:

(1) Universal Background Checks:

While the President won't name it as such, he is obviously determined to deny private purchases between individuals without REGISTERING the firearms involved.

HIS obvious intent to impose this restriction on firearms transfers is to insure that "bad people" (those with a record of felonious actions, including violations of current firearms laws) are not buying guns from "private resources" who may not be required to register the transaction.

He wants to keep the guns out of the hands of convicted criminals.  This is not an altogether bad thing.

Unless you are a firearms owner, and you think that your Government does not trust your judgement in regards to this kind of transaction.

Which is reasonable (not paranoid), because your Government does not trust you. At all.

But there is more to it than your hurt feelings.

WHY IS THIS BAD?

The proposed legislation would require that the transaction NOT be completed without a background check, presumably through the NICS (National Instand Criminal Background Check System).

This is the administrative system where a Federal Firearm Licencess (FFE) who is selling a firearm to an unknown (or know!) person will identify that person and determine whether the buyer is a person who is banned from purchasing firarms; essentially, a convicted felon.

Under the current law, that transaction must be deleted from the system as soon as it is determined to be legal.   Which means, there is no permanent record of what firearm (by make, model, caliber, serial number etc.) has been transferred from one person to another.

This system has been accepted by pro-gun and anti-gun proponents alike because it meets the criteria of both parties,

But in transactions between PRIVATE PARTIES, in which the seller who does not 'make a business of selling firearms' (a term which has not yet been defined by the Federal Government), the reportage requirements are not the same as that of a 'dealer' (which has also not been defined, but is assumed to refer to a person who sells firearms on a regular basis for profit, and his annual inventory 'turn-around' exceeds a certain margin ... which has also not been legally defined.)

PRO-GUN: we can sell our firearms to each other, and everyone is 'comfortable' that it is a legal transaction. Furthermore: we are not Gun Dealers, so we have no registration requirements (by law) and  there is no permanent record, so this process does not present itself as an ipso-facto measure of firearms registration.

ANTI-GUN: We are convinced that the purchaser has no criminal background, so this transaction is not contributing to the increase of firearms crimes.
Which is to say  that the transaction is not recorded, it is not examined by titular authority, and it could be ANYBODY *(even a convicted felon) because the LAW says that neither the seller nor the purchaser need 'check in' with the people who regulate the sales and purchases of firearms!


Friday, January 15, 2016

" ..... After They've Seen Paree"?

We in "the civilized West" have seen a dramatic upswing in random assaults, especially sexual assaults on women, in European countries who have "accepted" a huge number of "immigrants" from countries with a culture which do not accept the culture of their new host country.

Just recently:
Cologne Sex-Attack Spree Sparks 'Huge Spike' in Weapons Sales - NBC News: MAINZ,
Germany — A spate of Hundreds of sex assaults allegedly committed mostly by North African men on New Year's Eve in Cologne has sparked an "explosion in sales" of pepper spray and non-lethal guns, German officials and an industry chief said. 
Breitbart reports on "Europe's Rape Epidemic" in October of 2015, including Germany and England.

In 2015, FORBES asks:
Why Did British Police Ignore Pakistani Gangs Abusing 1,400 Rotherham Children? Political Correctness

In November 2015, Infowars reports:
A group of North African migrants living in a tent city in Stockholm have been found guilty of brutally gang-raping a 23-year-old woman in yet another example of how Europe’s open border madness is exacerbating the sexual abuse of women.
And on January 14, 2016,  in Liverpool, a Muslim immigrant from Eritrea was sentenced to ten years in prison for dragging a young woman into the woods and raping her twice.

APPARENTLY, these "young muslim men" see nothing particularly atrocious in the rape of young white women.  These young muslim men have grown up in a culture which does not value the sanctity of women, and so they feel free to assault and rape women of their host country ... the country which granted them santuary from the 'violence' of their home country.

German and English leaders have stated that there are so many immigrants applying for asylum that it is impossible to winnow out the legitimate sanctuary-seekers from those who seek only the social support (including monthly cash allowances) and relaxed police oversight on new citizens.

One would hope  that if it was impossible to determine who is a refugee and who is a potential rapist, the government would take steps to monitor their activities ... but that's an impossible burden on a police community which is already stressed by domestic crime.

Maybe it would be possible for these government to at least disallow migration of young males, whilc allowing married males and their female family members to enter the country and live a live of ease on the government dole ?  (Just a passing thought .. pay no attention.)

However, leaders of Sweden, England, Austria and Germany have already made it clear that they are trying to save as many innocents as possible, and so they are willing to accept that their background checks are not perfect.    The best thing is for their women is to never go outside. Problem solved!

I'm not sure that the innocent women and girls who are routinely raped by immigrants on the government dole are satisfied by the blatant abdication of their duties by their national leaders.\
Or their metro-men.

But, that could NEVER happen in America!  Because ... oh, well, this IS America!

PS:   THE GOOD NEWS IS THAT


H?T:

White "Men" more dangerous than ISIS?

Dallas Mayor: I’m More Fearful Of Armed White Men Than Syrian Refugees:

So it would seem that Rawlings is thinking of a smarter way to combat terrorism that doesn’t involve demonizing Syrian refugees or other refugees. I hope that trend catches on throughout the rest of the South. But in the meantime Rawlings’ courage to stand against Islamophobia should make his city (and all Texans) very proud. It’s just too bad the same can’t be said about the highest elected Texas official. Maybe that will change one day.

I'm trying to think of "white men" terrorists.
  • Navy Yard Shootings *(not white?)
  • Texas Army Base (Arabic?)
  • Columbine (Disaffected teen-agers, but still "white" and "male", if not "men")
  • 911 (weren't these  guys "white", as in "Caucasian"?  Islamic, though; does that count?)
  • Ruby Ridge (Hostage Rescue Guy Lon Horiuchi... "White"?  Was he a "Terrorist"?)
  • Boston Marathon (well, aren't Arabian males "white men"?)
  • Boston Bomber (oh .. it wasn't him)
  • The College Student in California who couldn't get laid?
I'm not sure, but I suspect that most mass murderers in this country (and others) find more incentive from their politics, their religion, their disaffection or their culture than from the color of their skins.

The point, which Rawlings seems to be willing to overlook, is that he is the racist.  He's not thinking of Syrians as "Islamists"; he's equating them with "people of color".  Why else would he be railing about "white men"?

“ISIS is no more Islamic than Nazi senior staff was Christian,” he said. He also subtly challenged Christian governors and other followers of Christ who have rejected refugees, referencing Jesus’ scriptural call to “welcome the stranger” in Matthew 25:41-43, asking, “Christ following people like myself — how do we deal with this issue of strangers, and are we going to let them in?”






Wednesday, January 13, 2016

I've Got Tears in My Ears from Lying on My Back in My Bed While I Cry Over You

WHEN YOU LIVE ALONE, it's funny the things from your past which come back to haunt you8.

Like ... song lyrics!

Today I got this song from the 1960's running through my brain, and I couldn't squelch it.

So I'll share it. and you may curse me for putting it into YOUR brain!



I've Got Tears in My Ears from Lying on My Back in My Bed While I Cry Over You - YouTube:
Homer and Jethro .. oh, that's SO corny!

WARNING: Don't fuss with me on this.  I have another song in the back of my head just BEGGING to get loose!

(Does your chewing gum lose its flavor on the bedpost overnight?)

And if THAT doesn't rot your mind, there's "Tie Me Kangaroo Down, Sport"

But wait ... there's more!

Please, Mister Custer!


Oh don't go yet, I've got a TON of them!

Like, there's that old song the ...(Gargle Gargle Gargle) .......

Tuesday, January 12, 2016

I was on the phone talking to my new medical insurance provider trying to identify my primary care provider, and confirming one specialist, when the agent stopped talking in mid sentence.]


"Are you there?  Hello?  Is This Thing Working?"   No answer.  The Galaxy 6 Smart  StoopidPhone was showing the Red Screen of Death! BAD!

(Not the actual Red Screen; they don't show that on the website)\


So I pushed the buttons to turn it on again, but I couldn't find the phone number that I had just dialed!

Fortunately, the representative had taking my phone number so she called me back.  We laughed, I praised her phone practices,  she accepted my policy changes and I completed my call.

I only wish the 'good folks' at Samsung (or is it Verizon?) were half as competent as the Insurance Representative.

Then I went to GUNBLOGGERS.COM and found THIS ARTICLE by Eric on the GUNMART blog.
Which starts out:
I wasn’t sure that it was going to be Biden, but I KNEW that this argument was eventually going to be made about ‘smart guns’…Its the argument that ‘The iPhone can be unlocked quickly with just your finger print, so why can’t we do this with guns?’
We don't have a lot of violent crime here in Geekistan, unless it involves drunken college kids dukeing it out in the back yard of the neighborhood kegger.   So I'm not really all that worried.

However, it's a point to remember that sometimes the worst has happened by the time you call 911 and then had to call them again because your $700 "Smart Phone" had just crashed your call.

Remember, when seconds count, your Smart Phone is only 10 seconds plus 5 minutes away ... after it reboots,
By then, anything important that is GOING to happen, HAS happened.

The Beloved Kimber: Good 

No Electronic Failure Points have been use in making this firearm.
No reboot necessary, anytime.
No parts involved in the construction of this tool were manufactured by WWII Sore-Losers from a country which we completely dominated in August of 1945 and then boot-strapped into one of the strongest economies in the world.

Either one of them,

Sunday, January 10, 2016

Trump's Trainwreck or Brewster's Millions?

I do NOT like Donald Trump.  I'm outraged that this is the best candidate the Republicans can find.

Donald Trump talks Ted Cruz, gun control and the Clintons | Fox News Video:
Jan. 10, 2016 - 14:11 - Republican presidential frontrunner on 'Fox News Sunday'

I like everyone else on the Republican Report Card even less, because they seem like children.  

ON ONE HAND, Trump is at least a grown up and understands money .... I'm just not sure that this is the same thing as being "a viable candidate" or "presidential timbre" (whatever that means).

On the other hand, everyone who seems to be campaigning for the Democratic Nomination is so extreme that they make Trump seem rational.

Is that what this country has come to?  That there is no rational, responsible candidates available among the hundreds of millions of "natural born" citizens who can lead us?

Trump has predicted that this Presidential election will have 'the highest voter turn-out in history".

I don't think so.

I think that Republicans will either (a) hold their nose and vote for Trump, or (b) stay home on Election Day.

Our Only Hope:   Brewster's Millions!
(The 1945 film version)
(The 1985 film version)

"NONE OF THE ABOVE"

That's a pipe dream,unfortunately.

Friday, January 08, 2016

The Fighting Representative

Rep. Greg Walden addresses U.S. House on situation in Oregon and the West | Oath Keepers
(Actually, I almost blew this off because it's a 24 minute you-tube political video and I hate that  ... stuff.)
But it's a slow night, so I started to watch it just to see what a small-town politico from a rural district (district 2 in Oregon, which includes my home town in Pendleton ... an area larger than a couple of states!) might have to say.

What I FOUND was an impassioned speech which not only addressed Citizens' Rights, but abuses of power on a national level.

Who knew that the local boy could make good?
Representative Walden champions the rule of reasonable logic 

Worthwhile quotes:

  • "This is a government which has gone too far, for too long."
  • "How do you have respect for a government which doesn't respect you?"
  • "What possible good will come out of bankrupting a grandmother?"
  • "We have to listen to the People."
  • "Fighting a war ... and dying."


Yes, I still detest politicians .. blood-sucking slugs on the testicles of the voters.

But this speech, by this guy?  I'm thinking MAYBE I should move back to Pendleton so I can vote for him.

It has been a long time since I've actually appreciated a politician.

Maybe there's a few of the "keepers" left.

(I'm not going to embed the speech here; Oathkeepers found it, they deserve the traffic.  And no, I'm not a fan of Oathkeepers, but they have performed a valuable service in bringing this issue to the public attention.)


[H/T: The War On Guns]

Thursday, January 07, 2016

I'm not easily impressed

When I AM impressed, I'm full-bore pedal-to-the-metal impressed ....

There’s never been an America, but rather several Americas—each a distinct nation. There are eleven nations today. Each looks at violence, as well as everything else, in its own way. 

... as I am here, by this article in "Tufts Magazine" (Tuft University Fall 2013 .. dated, but still vital) by Colan Windard

Tufts Magazine / fall 2013:

If you understand the United States as a patchwork of separate nations, each with its own origins and prevailing values, you would hardly expect attitudes toward violence to be uniformly distributed. You would instead be prepared to discover that some parts of the country experience more violence, have a greater tolerance for violent solutions to conflict, and are more protective of the instruments of violence than other parts of the country. That is exactly what the data on violence reveal about the modern United States. 

the author has divided the Continental United States into several regions, which exhibit common sociological perspectives.


To these regional definitions, the author as suggested meme-like societal priorities (for want of a better word, which I'm sure will occur to me as soon as I hit "PUBLISH").

This is a research project which somewhat parallel's John Lott's research, as it derives data from the county level rather than obey "state line" research parameters:

 Most scholarly research on violence has collected data at the state level, rather than the county level (where the boundaries of the eleven nations are delineated). Still, the trends are clear. The same handful of nations show up again and again at the top and the bottom of state-level figures on deadly violence, capital punishment, and promotion of gun ownership.
Perhaps the most striking aspect of this report is that the author doesn't make an effort to stigmatize populations based on their Second Amendment stance.  Instead, he has some information to offer, and he offers it without a minimum of comment (other than to explain what we're looking at).

Oh, go read it all for yourself.

Wednesday, January 06, 2016

Politically Correct YouTube Wins Again Because .. They Can!

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/HK45-yt-block.jpg

I don't know much about this, except that "They Can"

Hickok45 YouTube Channel Shut Down - The Firearm Blog:

 My friend Matt alerted me to this today. YouTube shut down Hickok45’s YouTube channel for “repeated violations of Google’s Policies”. I do not have any further information regarding this. At this moment there is nothing posted on his Facebook page. Hopefully Hickok45 will figure out what the problem is. I know many of us will jump to the “anti-gun” policies of Google. But let’s not make assumptions until it has been verified by Hickok45 himself.

I last watched one of his videos last night; I think it was whether or not a filing cabinet would stop a bullet.

(it could not)

I have no idea why YOUTUBE would cancel his channel, except that they have some kind of political pressure to discontinue hosting firearms-related posts.

I'll go check my own channel

Nope.  That's working.  Apparently YouTube isn't discontinuing ALL Firearms-related videos.

"The Inquisition Is Strong, Here"

She took them at their word, assumed "Liberal" meant that the college was willing to accept "liberal" view points.

And now they threaten her with either revocation of her tenure, or with a coldly dismissive of removal from her academic position.

Why do I distrust Liberals?
Because they lie.
A professor at a Chicago-area Christian college said Wednesday that administrators were wrong in taking steps to fire her after she asserted that Christians and Muslims worship the same God.
Larycia Hawkins told reporters she met with Wheaton College administrators several times and provided statements explaining her beliefs, which she believes are line up with the college's mission. She said she was initially told further discussion wasn't needed but college officials then changed requirements, saying her tenure would be revoked while she would have to participate in two years of conversations.
Why would this even be an issue at a "Liberal Arts" College?

Wheaton College - Google Search: Wheaton College  Liberal arts college in Wheaton, Illinois Wheaton College is a private American four-year Evangelical Protestant Christian liberal arts college in Wheaton, Illinois, a suburb 25 miles west of Chicago. The college was founded by abolitionists in 1860. Wikipedia
Oh.  I see it now.  "Evangelical Protestant Christian" and "Liberal Arts" are terms challenged by this situation, and the whole "LIBERAL" thing loses.

Big time.

Me?  I'm a Conservative ... and judging by the implied definition of the word "LIBERAL", there's not a Liberal bone in my body.
Still .....

Tuesday, January 05, 2016

Lies "Our Father" Told Us

How doth he lie to us? Let us count the ways… – Gun Nuts Media:

So the president has decided that he’s going to take “executive action” on gun control, and naturally he had to give a big self aggrandizing speech to announce his intentions to the world. It’s impossible for this guy to open his mouth on guns without telling some whoppers, so let’s have some fun and count the ridiculous lies he and his administration are pushing today.
Gun Nuts provides us with a plethora of pedantic presidential postulations (aka: "LIES"), which include:
  1. You can buy guns right off the internet with no background check (patently untrue)
  2. 1 in 30 people looking to buy guns on one website had criminal records (impossible to confirm or refute without details ... but it sounds just like a lie; how did 'they' know, and ignores NCIS vetting of purchases)
  3. We need the wide majority of responsible gun owners to join us to demand something better ("All of us need to demand a congress brave enough to stand up to the gun lobby's lies".)   A lie not because Obama's statement of intent is inaccurate, but the statement implies that "responsible gun owners" consider Obama's definition of "Something Better" ... further restrictions on responsible gun ownership ... to be an admirable goal.
  4. More than 30,000 Americans die from gun violence every year.  (A lie because it uses statistics selectively and without definition; that number includes defensive use, etc.)
  5. [there are more, but gun nuts quit out of exasperation]
Maybe it's time to re-run this 2012 parody:





Monday, January 04, 2016

Obama's "Alice in Wonderland" legislation

“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” 
(Alice, in Alice in Wonderland)

The thing is ... Obama's latest and greatest pitfalls for legal gun owners requires us to be what we are not; and if we are not, then we shouldn't be.    But still, we are, and we should. You see?

Obama's gun control options each have legal pitfalls | Reuters:
January 03, 2016
The Washington Post and Politico reported late last week that one of Obama’s main proposals would require some unlicensed gun dealers to get licenses and conduct background checks on potential buyers. Current law exempts smaller dealers who often operate at gun shows and sell online. Obama, who has been thwarted by the Republican-controlled Congress in his push for tighter gun control legislation, could act through an executive order, which would be immediate and carry the force of law. It would also almost certainly prompt lawsuits by gun advocates claiming the president lacks the authority to change the legal definition of who must obtain a dealer’s license.  (emphasis added)
So, what is "an executive order"?   Can the President impose one arbitrarily, without oversight from the Legislative Branch?

According to the online Legal Dictionary:
Most executive orders are issued under specific statutory authority from Congress and  have the force and effect of law.  Such executive orders usually impose sanctions, determine legal rights, limit agency discretion, and require immediate compliance.   Federal courts consider such orders to be the equivalent of federal statutes.  In addition, regulations that are enacted to carry out these executive orders have the status of law as long as they reasonably relate to the statutory authority.   An administrative action that is carried out under a valid executive order is similar to an agency action that is carried out under a federal statute.  In each case, the agency's authority to enact rules and to issue orders comes from Congress. (emphasis added)
Presidential Executive Orders can NOT be imposed (or "carry the force of law") if Congress does not agree that the context of the Executive order agrees with the content and intent of the  Constitution.

Which is to say that the Presidential Executive Order is NOT LEGAL if it is not "Constitutional".

Now, if Obama's intent is to "... require some unlicensed gun dealers to get licenses and conduct background checks on potential buyers ....", then perhaps he should look at the existing administrative barriers which prevent individuals from qualifying for a 'gun dealer license.
 There are many people who would sell a 'large volume' of firearms, but who would not currently qualify for a dealer license.  Is this a "Catch 22"?

And just what constitutes a "Dealer", anyway?  Is the criteria for definition of a "dealer" the volume of business conducted by an individual?  If so, is it the volume in terms of Number Of Firearms Sold Per Anum, or is it the Cash Value of Firearms Transactions Per Anum?

This is a grey area which has been conveniently allowed to endure for decades, by the government; and we can only guess why they have been reluctant to resolve the issue.

Our President seems to require those of us who would sell even a minimal number of firearms (not defined in federal law) to register as "Dealers", but he/they will not define the term for our edification.


Mister President! Mister President ... one question, please?

CNN to host Obama town hall on guns in America - CNNPolitics.com:
Obama will sit down with Cooper at 8 p.m. ET for the event, titled "Guns in America." The event's timing coincides with the fifth anniversary, next Friday, of the shooting of former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Arizona, in a rampage that left six dead and 13 others wounded. In addition to discussing gun issues with Cooper, Obama will also take questions from the audience on the issue.'
(emphasis added)

I hope that somebody asks this one question of the President:

Mister President, what do you understand is the meaning of the expression:
"... Shall Not Be Infringed" ?

Jihad Coming To The West? Not "if", but "WHEN"

Is a Peaceful or at Least Orderly Resolution Possible? | Gates of Vienna:
Posted on  by 
Last but not least, I highly recommend against “nation building” or any other military involvement of Western powers in the middle east. I have objected to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan from the very start, knowing that no one can reform Islamic societies other than Muslims themselves, and that this may take centuries to unfold. Instead I recommend containment. In other words, closing the borders, reducing all interactions with Islamic countries to the bare minimum, and investing resources in finding alternatives to middle eastern oil.

This is an extensive, and detailed summary of the problem of Jihadi's infiltrating Europe (and America).   I recommend reading.