No one injured when S. Carolina deputy shoots at man 5 times | WCBD News 2: BLUFFTON, S.C. (AP)
The sheriff of a South Carolina county is defending the deputy who shot at a man five times after authorities say the man pointed a pistol at the law enforcement officer. No one was injured.
Is it just me, or does anyone else see a problem when a L.E.O. shoots at someone who is pointing a gun at him ... and misses?
Beaufort County Sheriff P.J. Tanner tells The Island Packet the initial investigation shows the deputy did nothing wrong during the shooting early Saturday at the Vista View Apartments in Bluffton.
Well ... the deputy missed his target. Considering that he was engaging in return fire directed at someone who was shooting at him, there are people who would consider "failure to successfully elimate an active threat" to be the "wrong" response.
( So much for the "
The Only Ones Qualified" argument. )
Tanner says the deputy was not put on leave and remains active.
That doesn't speak well for a Department which apparently considers "the deputy who can't shoot straight" to be a valuable member of the department. The article does not suggest that the deputy was required to receive remedial training in firearms accuracy.
A news release says the unnamed deputy investigated when he saw two men sitting in a vehicle in a parking lot. The release says one man fled, and the deputy chased him and found the man lying on the ground, pointing his pistol.
The 18-year-old faces several charges, including fleeing to evade arrest.
Assuming that "
... (t)he 18-year-old ... " refers to the felon who was arrested for 'pointing his pistol' (presumably at the officer), it seems reasonable that "
fleeing to evade arrest" would be the least of the charges; how about "
attempted murder of a police officer"?
The duty of a sworn police officer is to uphold the law and go home to his family at the end of his shift. The Liberal Media may applaud the officer for his humanity in sparing the felon the violent end which he had earned, but the officer failed in his duty;
anyone who points a gun at a police officer will shoot a police officer; if not this one, then the next.
And to shoot at a man with a gun five times, and to miss, is to allow that felon to learn to be more heartless the next time he has an officer in his sights.
Who says no one was injured by an officer who failed in his duty?
Ask the next cop who meets that felon over a gunsite.