Showing posts with label Military. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Military. Show all posts

Saturday, September 22, 2018

Road Trip from HELL!

:at September back in '69


I got drafted on a Wednesday, proposed to my College Sweetheart that night.  By telephone.

Three days later, we got married.

A couple of weeks later, I reported for duty, and saw my wife on Thanksgiving and Christmas.

Then it got interesting:

After Basic Training and Infantry School, and NCO School, (graduated "top 5", as an E6 Staff Sergeant), and then it was time for my first posting: I went to Anniston, Alabama (Fort McClellan, home of WAC school and National Guard Basic Training) where I was a training officer.  I was allowed off-base housing, so I rented a private home from a local NCO who was on leave and I enjoyed connubial bliss with my wife (after paying her airplane ticket)

I would get off work at 1800, go jump in the community swimming pool; the neighbors complained that I usually jumped into the pool wearing my sweaty fatigues, but I ignored them.

Then I got a 3-week leave, plus travel time, so we decided to drive from Alabama to Oregon so we could save money.  Also, we had purchased a 1969 Ford Maverick ("The last car you can buy for less than $2000!") and we drove from Alabama to Oregon in three days ... taking turns driving, nonstop.

The car didn't have a radio, but I had bought an 8-track player and hot-wired it into the ignition system (lucky I didn't burn the car up!) so we listened to the only 3 8-track tapes I could find.  To this day, I cannot listen to Creedence Clearwater music without cringing.

We drove straight through from Alabama to Oregon in three days .. non-stop.  We took turns driving.

We stopped somewhere in Texas, when we just didn't have the energy to continue.  Just ... pulled off the road, turned off the car, and went to sleep.   We were awakened by a state trooper (whatever they call them in Texas), who was concerned that we had both died.  He had a helluva time waking us up!

We explained the situation to him, and he looked at us as if we were crazy people.  At that point, he was correct.  But "we were young, and sure to have our way", so we were advised to pull further off the road and kindly suggested that we "get a room".

My wife was asleep, and I was driving, when I passed a sign which said:

GRAND CANYON ... NEXT EXIT

I thought, this may be my last chance to see the Grand Canyon.  But instead of waking her up and discussing whether we should take the scenic detour, I just ... drove on.   I've always regretted that decision.

Finally we got to California, hit the I5 Freeway north, and got to Oregon where we could see our families sometime in the late afternoon after we-didn't-know-how-many-days of driving.

A few days later I reported for duty at my home town (Pendleton, Oregon) after visiting my parents.  gave the car keys to my wife, went to the Greyhound Station, and was eventually (after a year in-country as a training NCO in Georgia) assigned to my next duty station.  It was, not surprisingly, the First Infantry Division in Dian, South Vietnam.

But while I was serving in Viet Nam, I got a letter from my wife.  She and my sister were touring .. somewhere touristy ... and while backing out of the parking lot they bumped into a tree and dented the rear of that damned cheap-ass Maverick.

The mechanics had to replace the trunk lid.  It had folded up like .. well, a Campbell's Soup can would have been embarrassed.

Two years later, after I was back home, I was entering a freeway ramp (in the Maverick) when the hood suddenly just ... popped up!  Apparently, the double-lock hadn't functioned, and a gust of wind just flung it up in my face.

We got rid of the Maverick.

I got a really good trade-in deal in a well-used 1965 Chevrolet Corvair Convertible ... with custom-build dual 2-barrel carburetors!   The fabric roof leaked (especially after our neighbors cut the fabric roof to steal BUPKIS from the glove compartment) and the dual-carburetors were never tuned because no competent mechanic would touch them.

But damn!  It LOOKED FINE, especially in the summer when it wasn't raining.

Did I mention I live in Oregon .. the center of the Great Pacific Northwet?

Man, when it comes to cars, I sure can pick 'em!

Saturday, July 21, 2018

"New Machine Gun Will Blast Like Battle Tanks" ... as if!

Yeah, sure.  I've heard this before.  It was bullshit then, it's bullshit now.
Army's new machine gun will blast like battle tanks | Fox News: The Army’s new weapon will look like a light machine gun, but will put M1 Abrams Main Battle Tank-style blasting power literally at the fingertips of U.S. soldiers.
In 1970 Vietnam, while I was on "Profile" for an extreme case of "Bamboo Poisoning", the US ARMY put me on profile (light duty.)

I got a lot of scratches which were infected because they were not treated; it took 5 years for the sores to heal up ... nasty stuff!

While I was on "Profile", in the rear with the gear, the Army decided I was lolling around doing nothing, so they assigned me to the task of testing and evaluating a 'new weapon".

I don't recall the nomenclature, but it was a shoulder-fired, four-round semi-automatic rocket launcher which would launch rockets (essentially the M72 Rocket Launcher) from a "Man-Portable" platform used to disable enemy "armor"..

The "platform" weighed about 50 pounds when loaded, and it required an "assistant gunner" to carry 4-round reloads.  It may not have been the best usage of infantrymen, since the Viet Cong didn't have a lot of tanks

At the end of the test, my evaluation was that the mechanism was too heavy to carry in a combat environment, deprived the army of two infantrymen who were more effective with common shoulder-fired weapons, and served no discernible combat function because the burdoned infantrymen were unable to keep up with an infantry platoon during movement in the field.

Besides which, the rockets seemed unlikely to actually "Bust" a dirt-bermed bunker which was common in NVA fixed positions such as those I had encountered in at least two combat assaults.

(The M72 rocket was a "tank buster", and we never saw an NVA tank during my 1969-1970 tour.)

My sores healed up and I was returned to active duty.  I never saw any response from "higher" to my evaluation .. but the four-round semi-automatic M72 rocket launcher was never issued to troops in the field.   I decided that I had performed my duty by nixing a bad concept.

Monday, April 16, 2018

When the pin is pulled, Mr. Grenade is not your friend.

Who says the Military is humorless?

I recently revisited one of my favorite websites, and I feel like the Joker in BATMAN when I indulge in Dark Humor.

So I decided to share. 

Military Jokes Military Humor:
139. When the pin is pulled, Mr. Grenade is not your friend.

there's also "Sophomoric Humor" ...   check out BATMAN chooses his voice! 

Wednesday, March 01, 2017

Deregulation of the Regulations. (Oh, I LIKE this!)

New Army policy OKs soldiers to wear hijabs, turbans and religious beards:
(January 05, 2017)
Observant Sikhs and conservative Muslim women are now able to wear religious head coverings, thanks to a directive issued Tuesday that updates the Army's grooming and appearance regulation. Sikh soldiers also are allowed to maintain their beards, according to the update. Soldiers will still have to submit their requests for brigade-level approval, but the move opens up service to people who otherwise would have had to abandon cherished religious practices to serve. Since 2009, religious accommodation requests received by the Army have largely been from soldiers wanting to wear a hijab or a Sikh turban or patka with uncut beard and hair, according to the directive.
When I was in the service, we were told we could not have beard or moustache because "it doesn't match your official ID card".   Which meant, of course, it was because some 'suit' had a stick up his butt.

When I got back from Viet Nam two years later, with three stripes and a rocker and a CIB, nobody even mentioned my handlebar moustache.   I didn't look like my Military ID Card (which I had lost in a swamp somewhere) and I still wasn't strack;  but I was "colorful".

Check the picture .   Do all these people look "Strack"?  
I think they do.

Saturday, February 27, 2016

When It’s OK to Kill

Inside the School Teaching Cops When It’s OK to Kill - Bloomberg Business:

 Forty cops are in a classroom, watching recent footage of protesters in San Francisco denouncing the police. “Your children are ashamed of you,” a black woman in the video tells a black officer, who looks away. “Coward!” others shout. A young demonstrator walks up to a cop and sticks out his middle finger. A female officer trips, and the demonstrators laugh.
The volume is way up, and the cops in the room are leaning back in their chairs, crossing their arms, getting tense. Jim Glennon steps to the front of the room and stops the video. Glennon, 59, spent 29 years as an officer in Lombard, a suburb of Chicago, at one point running county homicide investigations. He’s 6-foot-1, 210 pounds, and has the gravelly voice and bearing of the desk sergeant on the 1980s TV show Hill Street Blues who told cops to “be careful out there” before the squad cars rolled. “Welcome to our world,” Glennon says. “It’s as bad as it’s been since the ’60s and ’70s.”

I spent a few days on Whidbey Island this week, visiting my son and his family.

Said son (aka "The Squid Kid") is a Master at Arms in the U.S. Navy.   He was recently promoted to E6 (Petty Officer Something ... I never was any good at Navy Ratings, but that's the equivalent of Staff Sgt. in the army) and in part my visit was an opportunity to again tell him how proud I am of his hard-earned promotion.

We had a chance on the last day of my visit to chat in private, without his wife and children listening to our conversation.  It was a bit of a letting-down of the hair; shared war stories, and he described many of the training operations he was becoming responsible.  

Wednesday, February 10, 2016

Draft Chicks!

Never Yet Melted  Why Republicans Were Suggesting Women Should Register For the Draft:

Many – I want to say most – men cannot handle the rigors of combat arms jobs, and it is reflected in the wash out rates just in the infantry. The two things the flurry of studies before this stroke-of-a-pen change have proven about women in combat arms are: if the president says women shall graduate Ranger school, then farking wimmin shall farking graduate farking Ranger school, and the standards shall be de facto lowered.
Oh, yeah?

You've been there?

I've between 145 and 125 pounds while I was in the Army, and I was an Infantry platoon sgt.

If the criteria was "could I have carried a wounded man" while I was in Viet Nam, the answer is NO, I could not have done so.

But I did my job, and I never had to carry a wounded man out of a combat situation.  I worked hard to ensure than my men were not needlessly subjected to the vagaries of war .. including wound.

No, I was not always able to protect them from wounds; the few men wounded under my guidance never noticed the balance I had to achieve between caution and aggression.

  No, it was not always an easy job, and no, the troops usually never noticed, let alone acknowledged, the things their Platoon Sergeant did to keep them alive.

If you think that a 125 woman could not have performed her job in the same situation, you're just crazy.  The job of a trooper may be more physical than that of a leader, but competence in a lesser role causes a member to be promoted to a leader role.  
Which is very much more complicated and onerous, but requires less PHYSICAL contribution to the mission.   (Which is why I don't think that Women should be 'shielded' from the Combat branches of the military .. such as Infantry, Artillery, and Cavalry.

(Okay, Artillery has to do mostly with toting heavy shells to the gun; that specifically requires "upper Body Strength", which is gender-specific)

Friday, October 30, 2015

Obama vs LBJ ... no difference

Obama authorizes Special Ops Forces to deploy to Syria | Fox News:

The deployment marks the first time U.S. troops will be working openly on the ground in Syria. A senior administration official called it a "small" deployment, involving "fewer than 50" Special Ops Forces to northern Syria.
Oh, yeah .. THAT sounds familiar!

RVN .. December 28, 1969.


Wednesday, September 16, 2015

"I AM THE BOSS!"


September 11, 2015

Navy Secretary Ray Mabus on Friday criticized a Marine Corps study that showed that female Marines in a mixed unit did not perform as well as men in several key areas.
The report study showed that the women tested were (a) selected because they had scored high on early PT (Physical Training) tests, and (b) they were intrinsically motivated to score well on the subsequent tests which evaluated their ability to perform on a par with men who were not selected for their ability to score high based on their physical abilities, but for their tendency to perform well when paired with women in teams..

Performance of the female participants in these trials was not only below that of their male counterparts, but were sub-par over all.

The study showed that females in the unit were injured twice as often as men, were less accurate in shooting and were not as good at removing wounded troops off the battlefield.
(Navy Secretary Ray Mabus) argued that other studies, including one by the Center for Naval Analysis, say there are ways to mitigate gaps in performance "so you have the same combat effectiveness, the same lethality, which is crucial."
Mabus said some of the report's conclusions were based on generalizations and not the women's performance.
"Part of the study said women tend not to be able to carry as heavy a load for as long, but there were women who went through the study who could," he said. 
The Secretary of the Navy was disinclined to accept the conclusions from this test period.
"They started out with a fairly largely component of the men thinking this is not a good idea, and women will not be able to do this," [Mabus] said in n interview with NPR.
"When you start out with that mindset, you're almost presupposing the outcome," he said. 

The thing about "tests" is, you don't start out with a pre-determined conclusion.  You start out with a hypothesis, and the test results are intended to prove or disprove the hypothesis.  It's a simple little thing called The Scientific Method.

The Secretary of the Navy, however, has it all back-assward.  He started out with a "truth", and then directed his subordinates to validate .. not prove, but validate .. the truth which he had pre-ordained.

You know when your boss says PROVE THAT X =Y and your job depends on 'your performance', not on 'the truth'???  That's the way it works in the military.   And even if it doesn't "work" .... well, if you have ever served in the military, you know,

But here, the truth was tested and rejected.  By "The Boss".  Only because he is "The Boss".

Doesn't speak well of the military, does it?

Doesn't say much for The Boss, either.


Thursday, September 10, 2015

Corn maze honors 'American Sniper' Chris Kyle | Fox News

Corn maze honors 'American Sniper' Chris Kyle | Fox News: The owners of a small Georgia farm took a tractor, a global positioning system and seven acres of corn and created a masterpiece made of maize last month honoring American sniper Chris Kyle.  “I felt like we needed to do something patriotic,” Misty Duren told me. “It hit me one day that it would be great to honor Chris Kyle.”

Personally, I thought it was pretty impressive.  I just finished watching the move, and I had already read the book.

Chris Kyle was a warrior.  We need men like him to defend our country, and our freedoms.  And we need the mind-set which creates warriors like him to protect American Freedoms against all the radicals who would undermine our civilization.

Okay, this may seem "hokey", but I think it's fine.  Damn fine.


Monday, July 27, 2015

Congress will FINALLY trust our troops more than muslim extremists? (Or Will They?)

"You got to ask yourself one question: Do I feel lucky?"


July 27, 2015:

Eight days I posted this opinion article:

Congress pushes to allow troops to be armed on military bases - Stripes:
 July 17, 2015 
WASHINGTON – Congressional leaders said Friday they will direct the Pentagon to allow troops to carry guns on base for personal protection following a deadly shooting rampage in Tennessee that killed four Marines and seriously wounded a sailor at a recruiting center.
From here, it sounds as if someone in Washington has finally removed their cranial box from their customary rectal depository, but ... you know Politicians.

If the cameras stop rolling, the suits start strolling.  Usually whistling a tuneless ditty, as if they're merely engaged in a casual stroll across the Capital Mall, and ...

They waffle

"Oh, excuse me?  Sorry, I was misquoted" they say .. if there is any chance that they may NOT have to actually follow through on their promises to arm U.S. military in unsecured public areas in CONUS.

Because our guys are, like, in Gun Free Zones.
(I may have mentioned my dislike of GFZ before.  As in:  February 2008 - May, 2013 ... for starters)
Unfortunately, the Army's Top Brass has less confidence in the quality of our troops than has Congress!
(From Fox News:)

The Army's top officer said Friday they would review security at military recruiting and reserve centers in the aftermath of the deadly shooting in Tennessee, but urged caution amid growing calls to arm more soldiers to protect against these kinds of attacks.
Gen. Ray Odierno, chief of staff of the Army, told reporters that arming troops in those offices could cause more problems than it might solve.
"I think we have to be careful about over-arming ourselves, and I'm not talking about where you end up attacking each other," Odierno said during a morning breakfast. Instead, he said, it's more about "accidental discharges and everything else that goes along with having weapons that are loaded that causes injuries."
[emphasis added]

A day later, I had this article to reinforce the argument AGAINST arming American Service Persons Domestically.

But wait .. there's more!

Sunday, July 19, 2015

Who is in charge here?

The American Congress is willing (if tentatively) to allow American troops to be armed in (some) Domestic venues.

But America's Top Military Command is reluctant to allow his troops to "Carry", citing concerns about safety and gun-handling competence on the part of domestic troops.

WTF?  Who is in charge here?

And if the Army can't train troops to be responsible firearms handlers, what does that say about their leadership?


Wednesday, June 17, 2015

Weapons Tests For Destroyer That Will Never Destroy Anything

Weapons Tests For Destroyer That Will Never Destroy Anything: WASHINGTON — Engineers at Naval Sea Systems Command are set to begin the next phase of their ongoing plan to test the effectiveness of emerging surface warfare technologies the Navy will never get to employ in actual combat this week, the Command announced.
“For heaven’s sake, we don’t actually want to ever use these weapons systems in battle,” said head of NAVSEA, Vice Adm. William Hilarides. “If we abuse this technology we might accidentally win a war, and that’s just an irresponsible use of smart power.”
Engineers hope to install an electromagnetic railgun on the fourth planned Zumwalt-class destroyer, USS Wesley R. Crusher, currently under construction at Bath Iron Works in Maine. 
Railguns send high-powered electromagnetic pulses along a set of rails to shoot a projectile at supersonic speeds. Conventional naval guns use a chemical propellent and lack the “swag factor.”

(Please Note: Duffle Blog is a Military Satire website)

Monday, June 15, 2015

What is it about Military Service that makes women kill themselves?

Suicide rate of female military veterans is called 'staggering' - LA Times:
New government research shows that female military veterans commit suicide at nearly six times the rate of other women, a startling finding that experts say poses disturbing questions about the backgrounds and experiences of women who serve in the armed forces.
Female suicides are a quarter of male suicides among non-vets.

But female vets kill themselves 4 time more often than non-vets ... compared to male vets and male non-vets.

Is it the pressure of serving?  Or are there more pressures (such as the high degree of sexual predation among serving women) which causes this high mortality rate?

I've always been a staunch supporter of women in the military.I grok the "Upper Body Strength" limitations which make it problematic for them to tote their heavier wounded male comrade from the battle field, and I know it's bullshit.

I also know that males may be so overprotective of females that they may put female well-being ahead of the mission.  That's the Male Soldier problem.

But has the American Military made the environment so stressful for female military that suicide has become an acceptable norm?

Again ... that's a Male Soldier problem.

But the female soldiers have been paying the price.

Friday, April 04, 2014

Grunts Without Guns (LONG!)

Reference "Another Ft. Hood Massacre", (which incident has been talked up much better elsewhere) ....  I'm still fuming about the practice of not allowing American military personnel to be armed "in camp".   This policy, established 20 years ago by President Bill "Willy" Clinton, actually goes back much farther.

Which explains part of my ire, which has been with me since 1969.

And which just might not be defensible.

Wednesday, April 02, 2014

Another Ft. Hood Massacre

Four dead, 14 injured at Ft. Hood, Texas congressman says - latimes.com: KILLEEN, Texas —
(April 2, 2014 @1718)
Authorities are investigating a shooting at Ft. Hood that left four people dead and 14 others injured, according to a Texas congressman. The sprawling military base was on lockdown as investigators tried to determine whether there was a second gunman.

Ft. Hood


The shooter was among the four dead soldiers. Count of wounded has not been confirmed yet.

Ft. Hood remains on lockdown and everyone at the Texas Army base is to "shelter in place."

The 1st Cavalry Division, which is based at Ft. Hood, sent a Twitter alert telling people on base to close doors and stay away from windows.
 That Base Sign is beginning to look like a tombstone.

It only lacks one more shield:

Friday, March 28, 2014

Live Fire exercise for American Pilots

Friendly fire: Navy seeks 'dummy' training missiles to shoot at pilots | Fox News:
(March 28, 2014)
The Navy is considering a novel way to protect its fighter pilots: firing live shoulder-launched surface-to-air missiles at them to train them in evasive action and test aircraft missile warning systems. The shoulder-fired missiles in the hands of terrorists, criminal and enemy fighters pose a worldwide problem. Insurgents in Iraq during the war posted YouTube videos showing their deadly ability with the weapons against U.S. military helicopters.
Sir Winston Churchill once famously said:  "There is nothing more exhilarating than to be shot at without result."

(He should know .. he had the experience during the Boer War).

Now the U.S. Navy expects to train their pilots how to use the same "Duck and cover" techniques which the U.S. Army trained infantry troops during the Viet Nam war.

By shooting at them.

However, these are 'controlled fire' exercises.  In the Army of the 1960's, grunt trainees crawled across a field in a ditch covered with barbed wire, ensuring that they could not stand up in an area over which zealous Training Cadre fired M60 machine guns ... the traverse bars of which were locked to only allow the 7.62mm bullets to pass several feet above the self-beshatting trainees.

In the 21st Century equivalent, the Navy ensures that (a) the 'rockets' are not capable of reaching the heights at which the jets are flying, and (b) the warheads are not filled with explosives.

The results are the same: the object of the exercise is to 'accustom' the subjects to "live fire", but at the same time the subjects know that they don't have to really EVADE the threat, but just keep on keeping on.

What's the difference between the 1960's infantrymen and the 21st Century pilots?

Both are bored by the exercise, but the pilots don't have to crawl through mud.

Yes, it's possible for the pilots and the grunts to freak out and deliberately expose themselves to fire.  But what are the odds? 

Does anyone think that grunts who knew they were going to Viet Nam, or pilots who 'suspect' they may be fired upon, will receive any benefit from these exercises?

Perhaps not, but it helps fill the training schedule.

Thursday, March 13, 2014

Piece in Our Time .. the things you can't forget

So we're walking along the verge of a clearing in the jungle, roughly following a path, and there's this arm laying in the middle of the path.

Curious.

It's like ... shattered.

No blood, no burns, just an arm broken halfway between the elbow and the shoulder.  Bit of bone broken and showing where it broke off.  Fresh, not smelly.   We're thankful for that part, 'cause we've had our fill of smelly dead people parts.  The horror has ebbed, now it's merely  discomfort and a moue when we find/smell dead people.

The guy on Right Flank hollers: "Hey, Sarge, you oughta come see this!"  He's 50 yards away, but he has found the rest of the corpse.

Nobody follows up on his 'invitation'; we've seen enough of dead bodies.  We have no wish to see more.

We walk on.

---

An hour later, we pass a water-buffalo skeleton.  Most of us, in the Vietnam platoon in the late Sixties, are from rural communities.  We've seen dead cows.  The range boss doesn't bother hauling them off, at least those in my home state.  The dead cows stay where there are, and they decompose, and they become part of nature.  Not a big deal.

Until my pace man bends down, and out of the melange of shattered ribs and untitled limb bones, he pulls out a skull.    It's a human skull.

Johnny is the pace man, and he's seen just enough of the human condition (his Aid Bag and his helmet were shot shit full of holes in The Ambush, and he survived so he don't care no more)  and he is delighted to find a skull.

He thread a boot-shoelace through the right eye socket of the skull, draws it through the mandibles.  The lower jaw of the skull falls away ... ALL of the flesh has been eaten by what seems to have been a White Phosphorus round  (which burns instead of blasts) so it is a 'clean' bone structure .. but the musculature has been destroyed.  Johnny doesn't care; he has the sweetest possible souvenir; a Dead Gook.

A few klicks further, Johnie pulls off the boot string that he has used to tie his Dead Gook to his webstrap, and the skull falls to the ground.  Maybe some other wannabe American Hero will find it, and carry it home.   Nobody cares.  Nobody picks it up.

It's disgusting to take body souvenirs and just maybe Johnny understands that.  Maybe he doesn't want to live the rest of his life staring at the skull of a Dead Gook in the dark hours of the night.

Or perhaps he just doesn't want to carry the dead weight.  Whatever.

---

American Artillery is credited, in the archives of Military History, with the bulk of War Kills in Vietnam.  They're welcome to it.  Those of us who walk the ground ... the Infantry ... we see the horror of war.  Maybe we are charged with the burden of of enumerating the "Body Count".  Maybe we just see, and don't report.  Maybe we are just knowing, remembering, and shutting the fuck up about it because it's too horrible.

But we don't forget.

And maybe that's the most horrible part of war.  The things you can't forget.





Monday, March 03, 2014

"War That's Not Ours!"

Karzai slams US government, military in interview ahead of elections | Fox News:
 (March 03, 2014)

Outgoing Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai angrily criticized the U.S. government for its conduct of the war in that country, which he described as being "for the U.S. security and for the Western interests." 

In an interview with The Washington Post published late Sunday, Karzai said that President Barack Obama told him last week that the U.S. would accept having the winner of Afghanistan's April 5 presidential election sign a long-term security pact that would keep some American troops in Afghanistan past the end of this year. Karzai negotiated the agreement with U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry this past fall and the deal was ratified by an assembly of Afghan elders known as the loya jirga. Nevertheless, Karzai has refused to sign the deal and made new demands in exchange for putting pen to paper.

Karzai told The Post that he feels "betrayed" by what he says are insufficient efforts by the U.S. to target Taliban strongholds in Pakistan. He also criticized the U.S. for inflicting civilian casualties in various military operation, saying "Afghans died in a war that’s not ours."
(emphasis added)

" ...  war that's not ours."



humm ... let us think about this.



American troops fought *and died* in Afghanistan in a determined effort to oust the Taliban .. and were ultimately successful, but as a cost which came close to ousting an American president.


This, after months of accusations that President Bush was paying too much attention to Iraq, which (according to the Liberal Press) constituted little or no threat to American Sovereignty. And Osama wasn't in Iraq! As a consequence, President Bush directed American forces to emphasize operations in Afghanistan, rather than in Iran.


After  ... literally .... YEARS of effort, American forces succeeded in their Mission Goal, and ousted the Taliban from Afghanistan and helped to install a National Government in Afghanistan, headed by a popular politician named ... oh, WHAT was his name?

Oh, yeah.   Hamid Karzai .


Then Barack Obama was elected to the office of President of the United States of America, under the platform that ... since Stupid Old Bush was waging war where he wasn't wanted, Obama would stop the war.

After being elected President of the United Stated of America, president Obama directed American forces to continue operations in Afghanistan under, basically, the exact same standards a the preceding president.

Meanwhile, American troops continued to die in a war that "wasn't their war" .. but Obama had conveniently forgotten that relatively minor detail.

And President Karza was perfectly happy to watch American troop die in their effort to free Afghanistan from the  political gridlock of the Taliban, and those who would preferentially continue their scorched-earth policies.

---

Today, for reasons which are poignantly political, rather than being driven by the continuing need to provide security to the people of his country, (outgoing) President Hamid Karzai has decided that (forgive me if I have lost track of the original theme ... it's not really all that obvious) America's continuing military presence in Afghanistan is, somehow, inimical to the leadership and sovereignty of Afghanistan.

He has conveniently forgotten that, sans the American troops in his country, he would be either a political prisoner or a corpse, at the hands of the Taliban.

___________________

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Night Ambush Part 4

(Read Part 1 here)
(Read part 2 here)  

(Read part 3 here)

After-Action Report

After the patrol had completed their initial sweep of the Kill Zone, they had found two bodies in the KZ and one wounded man in an ARVN uniform in the rivine south of the KZ.

The Tanks were there, and they dominated the area. Everybody was ready to pack it in, but Sarge said "NO!"  They had performed an initial sweep of the KZ, but they had not performed a detail search of the Ambush area.  Sarge knew that he had allowed the initial elements to pass through before initiating the ambush, and he wanted to insure that the lead elements had not been overlooked, and that there were no members of the VC force left hiding in the area.

First, they searched the bodies of the KIAs in the KZ.  The dead man had no arm, to their surprise, but the woman had a Tokorev pistol in her waistband.  It was new .. so new that she had not even bothered to clean off the preservative grease!  It was decided that since Chief had obviously killed her, the pistol belonged to him.  Spoils of war.  (Later, he was required to turn it in to the First Sergeant, who locked the gun in the Company Strong-box back at the Base Cam in Dian.)

There were a few AK47s strewn about the KZ; these were retrieved by the support troops aboard the Tanks.  The patrol never knew where they went, nor did they bother to ask.

Johnnie found his helmet where he left it on the ground, next to his Aid Bag.  Both had been well perforated by incoming AK47 rounds, so the patrol assumed that our initial Mad Minute was not so overwhelming as they had assumed.  Somebody had found the time to shoot back, but never actually hit anybody!

They found the VC Point Man hiding under a bush on the 'far side' (West) of the KZ.  He offered no resistance at all, and after he had crept out of his hiding place and knelt with his hands behind his head, Sarge offered him a cigarette .. which he gratefully accepted. Sarge was just so damned glad that the point man had not opened fire on the patrol while they were sweeping the KZ and killing other members of the attacking force, he would have given the point man his first born ... if he had any.

The tankers drove their behemoths around the area for a half hour, completely intimidating any other members of the VC attack force .. if there were any left ... while Sarge talked it over with the Battalion Commander.  The Colonel wanted the short squad to resume their ambush position, perhaps move it a couple of hundred yards in any direction.  Sarge wasn't "comfortable" with that.

Looking around at the detritus of the battle area .. claymores expended, and his men with lemur eyes reflecting the biggest fight any of them had been in.  It was clear to him, standing in the middle of the Kill Zone, that he couldn't get any single man to go back on the offensive.  They were frightened, and still trying to come to grips with what was probably the most one-sided fight anybody had ever experienced.  He asked himself:  if this is Victory .. what does Defeat look like?


"No sir", he replied.  "My men are exhausted, everybody in miles knows we are here, and we haven't any Claymores left. We're low on ammunition, energy, sleep.  My men would continue fighting, but I cannot ask them to search for a new ambush sight when everyone in the neighborhood knows exactly where they are and what they have just done."

The Colonel offered to replace the claymores.  Sarge dismissed the proposal.  The Colonel did not insist.

The patrol mounted the tanks, and were carried back to a new Laager.

 Sarge?  He crawled under the nearest tank to sleep.  The Tank Commander offered the suggestion that this was perhaps not the safest place to sleep.  A tank was the biggest target Charlie could find!

Sarge replied:  "Tonight, I will sleep with a roof over my head.  Your tank is my roof.  I earned it.  If you let Charlie blow up my roof, I will kill you.  So shut the fuck up, and post a good watch tonight because me and my men are going to crash!"

And they did, and rode down The Road past the village to the NDP, where they had a hot breakfast and spent the rest of the day cleaning their weapons, resupplying their expended rounds (Including the Claymores), and  every man took a nice cold shower.

Night Ambush Part 3: The Ambush

(Read Part 1 here)
(Read Part 2 here)
(Read Part 4 here)
"I hear voices .. someone's coming in!"

There's this cruel dichotomy about an ambush.
Yes, you like hearing voices as Charlie is moving toward his objective.  It means they're coming into the ambush kill-zone feeling fat, dumb and happy. It means that they have no idea that they're about to get their ass kicked.

The down side is ... they are so confident that they bring overwhelming firepower with them, there is no way (in their mind) that they can be overwhelmed by whatever firepower might be brought against them.

And the third thing is .. the patrol was positioned under the assumption that they could spot an attacking force at a distance, and be able to act as spotters.  Their could call artillery into their movement, and never reveal their own position.

Now .. Charlie had obviously cut the corner on the too-precious trail junction, and were coming in behind the American Patrol!

They had assumed that Charlie .. if he ever had the nerve to enter the AO .. would stick to the trails.  Obviously, they had much better understanding of theterrain, and their Point Man had lead them into the slightly much shorter route to their objective.

Two assumptions were immediately obvious to Sarge:
  1. Charlie knew where they were and where they were going, and we did not.
  2. There were so MANY of them that they assumed they could immediately and with little effort overwhelm whatever firepower we might have available.
The Bad News was that they were probably right.

American Forces set out as Spotters have a distinct advantage, in that they can call in artillery and Charlie has no way of knowing where the Spotters are.  The disadvantage is .. they were too close to call in artillery!

Sarge immediately realized that he didn't know which way Charlie was going to turn.  Was he going to the Village, to the East?  The ARVN Compound, to the South?  Or toward the NDP, toward the South West?  He had over-thought his position.   Seduced by "The Perfect Ambush Site", he had neglected to consider that he had left himself with insufficient perspective to determine the probable course of Charlie's movement.  There was a hole in his defense.

Worse, they were so close that he could not call in artillery on their CURRENT position without accepting the 100% probability that his entire patrol would be killed by their own guns.

Worst, Charlie was so close that even the smallest lapse in light or sound discipline risked discovery by the oncoming VC.   The choices were few, and each more fatal than the other:
  1. They could call in artillery on their projected course (bearing South) and risk the consequences of a wrong estimate; if he called in a barrage to the South, Charlie might move West toward the village;
  2. They could call in artillery on their alternate goal, West, Charlie might end up moving South toward either the ARVN compound or the NDP
  3. Worst case:  Somebody in his ambush might cough, or otherwise give up their position.  In that case, artillery (assuming they had time to call in a fire mission) would perhaps kill Cong, but would most assuredly kill Americans, too.
Faced with no viable artillery solution, Sarge made the only remaining viable decision:

The short squad would attack.

The line of VC in single file just kept getting longer and longer.  This was obviously no harassing attack.   Whatever their goal, Charlie (now there were at least ten men visible in the starlight) had invested a significant number of fighters.  They had not yet bent much to the South, but who knew what they would do when they hit the North/South Trail?  And they were moving through the South .. to the rear of the patrol's position.

Most of the Claymores were oriented toward the trail junction, to the North and West of the Ambush Position.  Only a few of the Claymores were directed toward the rear.  Sarge had made a tactical decision, and it was the wrong one for this situation!

So .. make a 'new' Tactical Decision!

The VC had still not made a 'significant' appearance; because of the high spirits of the VC unit, the patrol knew where they  were and their rate of approach.  There were still a few precious seconds left when Sarge could direct his men without the VC likely hearing him.

To Ernie:
"When I give the word, move your MG pointing SOUTH instead of NORTH.   Have your Assistant Gunner help with moving the ammo when you move the gun. Be quiet, be quick, and when the Claymores blow, shoot your whole ready load moving from left to right.  I don't care about the point man, I just want everyone behind the lead element to see their people die!"

To Brent:
"I'm going to blow this ambush. First, radio TOC and tell them I want maximum artillery flares over our position as soon as they see our tracers.  Light us up like the Fourth of July!  I know they can't  reply before we blow the bush, but as soon as they can is not too soon. Then I want them to bring in support .. tanks, preferably.  But keep everyone away from the South of our position, because that's where the fire is going. And Brent, when we blow the ambush, everyone is going to be pointing South.  You're Rear-Guard .. I want you pointing North, with your rifle, and if you see any thing move ... kill it.  Don't wait for me to tell you, it's a free-fire zone everywhere you can see tonight."

General instructions to everybody else (huddled together .. everyone knows what's happening, but not what's about to happen):
"Listen!  Be quiet!  Charlie is moving through our rear, from left to right.  Everybody point their gun to the South.  Don't make any battle-rattle! When the Claymores blow, I want Johnie and Teddy to open on full auto; sweep the line!  Then reload.  Ernie will be rockin' and rollin'.Then  reload, and Chief, Stehman ... you'll take up the fire on semi-automatic.  As soon as everybody has gone through one magazine and reloaded, take targets of opportunity.  We are in deep shit, so make it count and follow my lead after the claymores blow!"
Everybody, not expecting anything 'bad' to REALLY happen, has doffed their helmets in favor of boonie-hats.  We can't afford the risk of a "CLANK!" if a helmet bumps a gun, so we're blowing this bush the way we are.

Then, to Brent, Sarge says:

"Look, we have four Claymores generally pointed in the right direction.   Toward the enemy.  You take East/Rear and I'll take West/Rear.  Fill your hands, and when I blow my two, you blow your two!  Then I want you to  advise TOC, and pick up your rifle.  You are the new 'rear security.  Face North.  If you see anyone moving there, kill them.  But keep talking to TOC, and for God's Sake, get us some light!"



Brent doesn't waste time protesting that he has already heard most of these instructions. He's unflappable .. Sarge at that moment wants to bear his children.  Brent just picks up the appropriate 'clackers', and waits for the signal to kill some Cong.

There's a few moments, which seem like hours but actually are seconds, and then everyone has move so their weapons are pointed toward the rear.  Brent has his headset between ear and shoulder, and two Claymore Initiators (clackers) in his hands. Sarge is ready.  The men have moved their weapons so they are pointed south.

Sarge gives Brent the nod, and they both squeeze the Clackers ...

BLAM!  BLAM! BLAM!

Pandemonium!

Dust flies up from the Claymores, even the two which aren't really pointed South .. East and West Claymores just add Sound and Fury to the mixture.

Two men, who are already pointed South, open up with their M16s, the rest roll over to point to the South.
Ernie takes two seconds to actually move his gun .. and it's not important whether he's quiet about it or not, because there is a fountain of 5.56 moving south and the echo of the Claymores and the dust they kick up obscure the battlefield!

Brent is online with TOC, calling for back-up and Illumination Rounds.

Sarge is servicing the battlefield with his onboard HE round, and quickly switches to the first StarLight round he finds, and then seeks for and loads a Parachute Flare.

The light from the local illumination round shows a couple of people down in the Kill Zone.  Can't tell where the point man is, and the followers are rushing back toward the woods.

What happens next can only be described as a "Mad Minute". EVERYBODY shoots their initial load.  It doesn't matter what Sarge said, everybody shoots.  They are scared to death, they have a ton of Victor Charlie within spitting distance of them, and all they want to do is to put every body down and then go home!

The best laid plans of mice and men ....

Ernie .. does not run out of ammunition.  He has 300 rounds of linked 7.62 and he is taking nicely timed short bursts.  But they go everywhere that someone is still standing in front of him, or everywhere he thinks someone may be still standing up.  Or where-ever it is dark, and someone may be hiding there.  Or where-ever his barrel may be pointing.  He doesn't care, he's just putting rounds down-range, and that's all that really matters.  Sarge takes a moment, no more, to admire his discipline and his aim.

Ernie's Assistant Gunner (in this case, Johnny, because he ends up on the left side of Ernie) feeds the gun.  Johnie is not an experienced AG, but he has an ammo can in reach and he's doing the best he can to link the new belt with the old.

Thankfully, by the time Ernie runs out of ammo, there's nothing obvious left to shoot at.  The rest of the patrol does an automatic reload, and all are left with the realization that their jaws are dropped and they are looking at a field of nightmares .. but it's not THEIR nightmares.

In the meantime, in the sudden silence, Sarge is shouting.

"RELOAD!  Everybody, Reload!  I don't care whether you need it or not, RELOAD!"

Instinctively, everyone who is still alive obeys.

Thankfully, every American is still alive.

"Okay!"  Sarge shouts.  "We're all locked and loaded.  Everybody UP!  We're going to sweep the kill zone.  Anybody still alive, kill them!  Keep going until I tell you to stop!  Attack!  Attack!  Attack!  Now, Up and At 'Em!"

__________________________

Brent doesn't move.  He's sitting where he started, except he's facing North, where Sarge told him to pull rear security.  He's talking to TOC, asking for artillery illumination.  He's calm, he's fully aware of the tactical situation, but that's not his job.  His job is to (a) get some light on the kill zone, and (b) get tactical support to the battleground ASAP, and (c) let Command what is going on in this most beautiful, most perfectly exquisitely executed ambush anyone has ever seen .. a thing if beauty it is!

And he is STILL watching to the North, in case any tail-gaters try to flank the unit.
__________________________

And while Brent is doing his job with joie de vivre and Great Aplomb .. everyone else is doing THEIR job with savagery and the greatest adrenalin rush they will ever experience.

Their job, as they sweep the battlefield, is to kill everything that moves.

There is no other way to do it.

EVERYONE caught in that limited scope of dead ground, is .. dead.  Nothing less is acceptable.  Anyone found there is assumed to be armed and dangerous.    There is no time to separate the Quick from the Dead.  If they are there ...  they should be dead.  If they are not dead, it is our task to make them dead.

The alternatives are too horrible to consider, even more horrible than shooting wounded soldiers.  They are the enemy; they want to kill us.  That's why we call them "The Enemy".

The Woman:

As Sarge rushes down his lane across The Killing Field, in his peripheral vision he sees a woman in black pajamas, on her back, squirming.  Writhing.  She is assuming the "Dying Cockroach" position .. limbs in the air .. but not yet dead.  In some back part of his mind, he wonders what this woman in black pajamas is doing in a Killing Field?

His wonderment lasts only for a few seconds.  Chief, with his M14, is in the next lane to his left.  The woman is in Chief's lane.  Chief drills the woman with a half-dozen rounds from his M14, and suddenly the woman reverts to dead meat.

Sarge peripherally wonders what the woman was doing here.  Was she a guide?  Was she a captive of the VC?  Was she .. who knows what?

It doesn't matter.  She ended up in the Kill Zone, and now she's dead Dead DEAD.  Who she was, why she was there .. that isn't important.  What is important is that she is now nothing more than a mound of meat.  She will have no effect on the outcome of this battle.  She cannot hurt his men.  That's all that matters.

Sometime, in future years, Sarge may regret her death.

Sometime, in future years, Sarge may wonder at her role in this   ... this "action".

But for now, she's just a target, caught at the wrong place at the wrong time.  For now, she is dismissed.   Target Down; that's all that matters.

Given a choice between here and Chief, Sarge will choose Chief .. every damned time, for now and forever.