Saturday, July 26, 2014

Chicago's Emanuel wants city to house 1,000 more young illegal immigrants, report says | Fox News

Chicago's Emanuel wants city to house 1,000 more young illegal immigrants, report says | Fox News:
(July 26, 2014)
Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, a former Obama administration chief of staff, wants to expand the city’s efforts to house young illegal immigrants from Central America, reportedly proposing to shelter an additional 1,000 of them by year's end.

"The influx of unaccompanied child migrants is a growing humanitarian crisis that we can no longer ignore," said Emanuel, according to The Chicago Tribune. "While we have our own challenges at home, we cannot turn our backs on children that are fleeing dangerous conditions.”
Whoa!

Child Abuse?

This, in the Murder Capital of America, where the majority of the victims AND the perpetrators are "people of color" under the age of 25?

And Mayor Rahm wants to bring more young "people of color" into his battle-zone?  Talk about "Humanitarian Crisis"!

And he thinks this is "A good Thing".

Hmm ... let's look at a randomly selected news article to illustrate how safe it is to be a Chicago resident.
(search argument: "CHICAGO MURDERS" via Google at 2030 on 07/26/25).

Top match: "Six Cities with the Worst Murder Rate in the United States"  (I know, the link is a duplicate.)   I swear, this is the top of the search list results.  I don't have to make this stuff up.
CHICAGO (CBS) — During roughly the past three decades, there have been six cities that have been the worst for murders, per capita.
If you said Chicago made that list you would be …Wrong.As CBS Chicago correspondent Mason Johnson has reported in great detail, Chicago is not the “murder capital” of anything.
You think The Geek has his wires crossed, don't you?

Hooray! The Witch Is Dead!

SAF  vs DC

SAF - 1
DC  - 0

(The link is to a PDF which opens in a new window.

For commentary see David Codrea's article in The Examiner.

Friday, July 25, 2014

RoboCop is protecting our Border -- The Northern One!

Step Away From The Camera -- Or There Will Be Trouble!

Is this the 21st Century's version of "The War of Northern Aggression"?

After all the controversy about our Southern border and the easy access by illegal aliens .... what's with the recent series of assaults on American citizens attempting to re-enter their country while returning from a trip through Canada?   The assailants?   The U.S. Border Patrol!

Incident one: Alaska

Troop leader: Federal agent pointed gun at Boy Scout | Local News - KCCI Home:
(July 23, 2014)

DES MOINES, Iowa —Boy Scouts from Troop No. 111 witnessed an intense chain of events after one of their members snapped a picture of a federal officer working the border entry point.



Short version of the story:  a troop of Boy Scouts from Iowa attempted to enter Alaska after the end of their tour through Canada.  A member of the troop took a picture of the Border Patrolman, who got all panty-wadded and told him that it was illegal to take the picture.  Prison, fines, etc.  Scared the troop leader, even.  Then the Federal Agent insisted that they unload ALL their gear and luggage so it could be searched.

While they were attempting to comply, the patrolman took exception to one boy who grabbed a suitcase "without authorization" ... and pointed his loaded handgun at the kid's head.

Wow!  What if the kid had a kilo of Mexican Black Tar Heroin in his suitcase (as is not infrequent at the Southern Border)???



Oh, by the way: the Border Patrol says it never happened.
 (... and if it did, you can't prove it because we've got the pictures.)

But there are some pictures, taken during the search, to prove at least THAT part of the story.



Incident two: Maine

Border Agents Harassed My Family, Forced Me to Delete Recording, 'Because' - Reason.com:
(July 24, 2014)

 At the Jackman, Maine, border crossing into the United States, I get interrogated about what I have in my car. And not just the three juicy Canada-bought clementines, either. "What is your relation to these children?" brusquely demands the young border guard who examines my two daughters' passports and my own. They do have their mother's last name, and they do look somewhat Asian. I'm white. Maybe he's curious. So I don't give him any lip.
A reporter from Reason Magazine "We Deal in Lead, Friend!"  (Lead Stories, that is) wrote that when he was "harassed" by a dubious Border Patrolman, he tried to record the encounter on his IPhone.  The Main RoboCop twisted his arm to confiscate the cell phone.


"Never mind. Follow me into lane one, please. We're going to have to search your vehicle. Please give me your driver's license."
I hand it to him, then park the car in the area he indicates.
"Now please get out of the car and follow me inside."
I grab my iPhone off the dash, hit the record button, and tell him politely: "For my protection, officer, I'm now recording what's happening." He stays silent. I step out of the car, and without warning, he physically attacks—that is, he wrestles the phone from my hand, twisting my arm in the process. I'm stunned.

When the reporter asked why it was illegal to photograph Border Guards during the incident, the response was: "Because".   After the reporter agreed to delete the video from his IPhone, he and his children were released.   Sort of, like "Free Range Chickens".  The problem was not their nationality nor their credentials, but that they had the effrontery to photograph "Border Agents" during the performance of their duties.

Both of these incidents were intensely intimidating to the victims (reminder: all American Citizens) who were able establish their identities and their citizenship.  When they were allowed the opportunity.

Are you contemplating a vacation tour of Colorful Canada this summer?  Plan to come back to America?




Now, if you were not a credentialed American, and you were crossing our SOUTHERN border?

No problem.

There is a moral to this story, but I fail to see it.


Tuesday, July 22, 2014

Homeland Security Secretary: Illegals Have ‘Earned Right to be Citizens’ | CNS News

Homeland Security Secretary: Illegals Have ‘Earned Right to be Citizens’ | CNS News: (CNSNews.com) –
(January 24, 2014)

Speaking at the United States Conference of Mayors on Friday, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said the approximately 11 million people who are in the country illegally have “earned the right to be citizens.”


Oh, really?  And if they are "in the country illegally", perhaps the Honorable Secretary will explain exactly what they have done to have "earned the right to be citizens"?

Was it something passive?  Were they born here, of US Citizens?

Probably not. If they were, Johnson would not have said they were "in the country illegally".  Natural Born Citizens are not illegally in this country.

How else could they have earned the right?  Was it something which 'actively' did?

For example, did they apply for entry to this, which (to them, is a "Foreign Country"?  Did they apply for immigration?  Apparently not.

One path to citizenship is to enlist in the American military, and earn their citizenship as a result of their military service.

But ... 11,000,000 soldiers who came to this country to fight for this country?  A that level, that wouldn't be 'citizen-soldiers', that would Janissaries.  No, slavery is no longer practiced in this country.

Johnson said: “An earned path to citizenship for those currently present in this country is a matter of, in my view, homeland security to encourage people to come out from the shadows”.  What does that mean?  What shadow ... is that the shadow of having entered the country illegally?  And who cast that shadow?

Or is it all George W. Bush's fault?  Or my fault, or yours? 
 (Have I mentioned that Johnson was  appointed by President Obama?)

He said: "“It is also, frankly, in my judgment, a matter of who we are as Americans to offer the opportunity to those who want to be citizens, who’ve earned the right to be citizens, who are present in this country--many of whom came here as children--to have the opportunity that we all have to try to become American citizens.”

I'm confused.  But I'm old and ignorant, so perhaps someone can explain to me why he seems to say one thing and then the complete opposite in the same sentence.  It sounds to me as if he's saying that the people he has already described as illegal have 'earned the right' simply by finding themselves within the borders of the United States of America ... without permission.

Which strongly implies that they have broken American border laws to be here; and if you are successful, that's all you have to do to "Earn The Right".

“The five core missions of the Department of Homeland Security are guarding against terrorism, securing our borders, enforcing our nation’s immigration laws, safeguarding cyberspace and critical infrastructure in partnership with the private sector, and supporting emergency preparedness and response efforts at every level,”  Johnson said.
What part of those core missions are supported by endowing citizenship on people who ignore our borders and our immigration laws?    We can acknowledge their poverty and their desire to improve their lives by moving to a nation which has a more robust infrastructure and superior social programs, but should they become our problem, arbitrarily and unilaterally?  If we are paying to resolve their problems, shouldn't we be consulted? 

“Common sense immigration reform is supported by the U.S. Conference of Mayors, businesses, and if the polls (are) to be believed, the majority of the American people”
The polls have NEVER said that:  the polls have said that we should secure our borders and enforce immigration laws.  Which, I believe, is what Mr. Johnson said earlier in his preamble, is part of The five core missions of the Department of Homeland Security.

 Which is HIS JOB!

Johnson said. “Border security is inseparable from homeland security.”

But if his opinion is that his job is to hold two diametrically opposed priorities on the same subject, then he either is a lying son-of-a-bitch or he is failing to deal with his cognitive dissonance.  In either case, he is obviously the wrong man for the job.

Or a liberal.  And in our current POLITICAL situation, it's perfectly okay to NOT do your job, as long as you are a good Liberal.

Friday, July 18, 2014

The Gun Lobby And A Dumb Law Are Keeping Us From Safer Guns

The Gun Lobby And A Dumb Law Are Keeping Us From Safer Guns:
(July 16, 2014)   The Huffington Post

If Loretta Weinberg is so adamant about the efficacy of "Smart Guns", why is she offering a "deal
to the NRA that she will withdraw what she has already admitted is a dumb law?

Just another Liberal Democrat end-run, for political purposes?  Probably, but pity the poor Huffington Post Writer who is charged by his editor of keeping up with the Politics while pretending to understand the issues ... which he (admittedly) DOES NOT!

Wednesday, July 16, 2014

Pee-waddin'

Inspired by Never Yet Melted's "I'm Not Doing That" post today, I can't resist the urge to offer this 2013 version of YouTube's "Best of the Web".

If some of this doesn't scare the Pee-Waddin' out of you, you're braver than I am.








Tuesday, July 15, 2014

"What should they do? Compromise?" A Modest Suggestion.

Embrace Obama's Border Security Bill:
(July 14, 2014)
The new Obama law changes the existing William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act, a 2008 statute that says minors who are not from Mexico or Canada are entitled to legal proceedings before they are deported. Surprisingly, Obama has agreed this is not a good idea and wants to scrap it. He wants speedy deportations. He is also asking for $400 million to secure the border and pay for additional border agents, as many have been moved to detention centers and other cities to deal with the humanitarian crisis. Senate Democrats are not so happy with Obama’s bill, which will increase deportations and end the crisis. Congressional Republicans don’t like its $3.7 billion price tab. What should they do? Compromise.
No.

Current procedures are to send border-compromisers back where they came from, unless they are children.

Realizing that children are being sent unattended by their parents, who expect (with justification) that the current procedures will ensure the safety of their children no matter what happens, the border patrol should change their procedures.

They should transport the children to that point farthest away from their initial entry point, place them across the border, and not that they have been "displaced".

For example, if the illegal border-crossers have been apprehended at Laredo, they should be re-inserted at Tijuana.

 But the parents of these children have decided that they cannot afford to keep their children, so their only choice is to suckle on the good will of the American President (who has already shown that he doesn't really care.)

Perhaps if the surviving children were subject to inconvenience, their parents would cease sending them over the border.  Apparently, they are unable (in their current economy) to survive with so many hungry mouths to feed.  So they send their children to another country, in hopes that others can assume their parental duties.

This .. doesn't sound fair to the people upon whom they are imposing.  If they care so little for their children, they should at least be obliged to assume the burden of retrieving their children ... which is essentially what they seem to be asking Americans to do.

Or, they could just eat their children.

Monday, July 14, 2014

Can USPSA run a profitable Nationals?

USPSA Finances Part 5: Can USPSA run a profitable Nationals? | Gun Nuts Media:
Today I want to regather my focus and look at Nationals, the single largest expense on the USPSA tax returns.
----
It is immediately obvious that USPSA loses money each year on the National Championship matches. The average money lost by USPSA over the six year period of Nationals we tracked is approximately $250,000 a year. That is an awful lot of money.
Today we have two questions: can USPSA run a profitable National Championship series
and more importantly, should they?
I don't know if USPSA should run a "Profitable" National Championship series.  Probably not .. they never have before.

But SHOULD they?

Well, that would be nice.

I dont think that anyone who has ever been to a Nationals Match expects that it .. or USPSA as a whole .. should be a "Profitable" venture.

This is an all-volunteer venture.  The sole purpose is to allow us, the members, to compete at a variety of skill-levels.  Most of us are really not very good at what we love the most ... shooting at difficult targets under challenging circumstances.  It stands to reason that the National Matches present the greatest challenges.

Most of us who spend our time, money and energy competing  in USPSA matches don't expect to win.   It would be nice if we came in at a 'high level' in our own designated Class and Division.  But there are always those people who are 'talented' who almost invariably win.  We secretly loath and detest 'talented' shooters, but the statistics don't lie;  they are better than us.

We can live with that.

Every year, hundreds of not-very-good shooters compete in the Major Matches: Sectional, Area or National matches, it doesn't matter except that the higher-rated the match, the chances grow increasingly slim that we will "do well".

We don't care.

We just want to shoot a "Major Match".

Your reasons for spending hundreds of dollars may vary.  You may want to see how you stack up against the best of the best.

You may want to meet the best and brightest in the USPSA world.

You will spend more money than you can afford, you won't win a darned thing, and you'll come away thinking that it is "money well spent"

DYING to come to America: "Watered Down" Immigration policies responsible

Report: SMALL LIFELESS, DEAD CHILDREN Found “Washed Up Along Riverbank” of Rio Grande | The Gateway Pundit:
(July 14, 2014)

A Fox News exclusive reported this morning by Jana Winter inexplicably buried the lede.
  Winter reports that several dead children have been discovered “washed up along the riverbank” of the Rio Grande, but fails to note that there have been no reports by the Obama administration on this.
 This indicates a pattern of covering up dead illegal alien kids by the Obama administration. It was two weeks before news was reported on the sole child death acknowledged by the Obama administration, Gilberto Ramos, a 15 year-old boy from Guatemala whose body was found in the Texas brush dead from the heat.

(Note: according to this report, Gilberto Ramos did not drown while crossing the Rio Grande.  however, apparently several other juveniles did.   Whether death by drowning or dehydration, the consequences --- and the blame --- are the same.)

Let's face it: we have an Open Border to our south.

Our president, for reasons known only to himself, has refused to enforce current Immigration Laws.

Especially, he has made statements which might be interpreted to mean that he will not stop "children" from illegally crossing the border from Mexico and Central/South American countries.

He may consider this a "humanitarian effort", but from this report it is anything but humanitarian.

Children are literally dying because of the failures of the Obama policy.

Even if we are not concerned about who besides "migrant workers" (and their families ... those who are still living) may be encouraged to enter America illegally: perhaps it's time to be aware of, and consider, the fact that these family members will never be seen by their fathers and their mothers again.

If Obama was a home-owner in Chicago, who had a swimming pool in his back yard; and if neighborhood children climbed his chain-link fence to swim in his pool ... and if those children drowned in his swimming pool, what would happen?

He would be charged as having "maintained an Attractive Nuisance", and prosecuted for any consequences.

In this real-life case, the issue is not that there are no fences around the "swimming pool" that is America, but that the "owner manager of the property"  (The American President) has unilaterally declined to enforce any 'punishment' for people who attempt to illegally cross our southern border.

Washington Examiner (7/13/14): "Obama Pays Price for Inaction on Immigration Law":

In the short run Barack Obama paid no political price for the Democrats' decision to sidestep immigration. The only time he got pressed on the issue was a grilling by Univision’s Jorge Ramos in September 2012. Obama carried 71 percent of Hispanic votes in November.
---
The second thing that led to the flood of underage illegals was Obama’s declaration in June 2012, five months before the election, that he would not enforce immigration laws against so-called “dreamers,” young adults brought over the border illegally as children who also met certain conditions.

Sometimes, "Hope and Change" can kill you; and the man responsible for the deaths of these children is he who so cunningly held out the hope of the "undreamable dream" for people who would probably not have sent their children to confront the lion mouse in his lair, if they had not been encouraged to do so by the man with a cell phone and a pen.

President Obama is responsible for the deaths of these children.

He, alone.

(Source referenced by David Codria via gunbloggers.com)

Sunday, July 13, 2014

Definition of "Most Transparent Administration ....."

Earnest defends notion of 'most transparent administration' in US history | Fox News:
(July 13, 2014)
The White House on Sunday stood by President Obama's position that he continues to be the most transparent president in U.S. history, despite widespread complaints from journalists and other Americans about a lack of information or apparent misinformation.

Translation:  "The Emperor Has No Clothes!"

Saturday, July 12, 2014

"If This Goes On ...

PREFACE:
Robert Heinlein wrote short stories and novels based on the premise: "IF the goes on ...." the schtick was to take a current (then in the 1940-1960 decades) societal or cultural meme and extend it to its logical absurdity.

Claire of the "LIVING FREEDOM" blog (aka: "Backwoods Home") wrote an apologia Friday and then wrote the article for JFPO, who published it today (Saturday, July 12, 2014).   It has since been picked up by many gunbloggers, but on the off-chance that you missed it ... below under "DISPATCH FROM THE FUTURE" is the link and the introductory paragraph from this apocryphal tale of a Dystopian America.

Also check out the background article: "Those nice people who want to annihilate you".

(NOTE to self;  start new Category/Label designated:  "DAMN! I Wish *_I_* had written this!")


Dispatch from the Future:
 REPORT TO THE NATION ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF GUN CONTROL
               By the Blue-Ribbon Panel on the Current Crisis
 BACKGROUND: Following the Sunnyside Nursery School Massacre and similar disasters, Americans in the mid decades of the twenty-first century realized that "NO GUNS" signs and similarly stringent security measures were no longer sufficient to totally eliminate deadly violence from society.
 Although the gun-rights movement had experienced decades of successes, Americans finally rose up and demanded sweeping reforms. Some notable pacifists called for the slaughter of all gun owners and the torture of any politicians perceived to be pro gun. Police chiefs threatened to have their officers shoot any armed person on sight. The nation was in crisis.    ......

[read on ... repeats the DISPATCH FROM THE FUTURE link above]

How to Get Started in Competitive Shooting

How to Get Started in Competitive Shooting: | Triangle Tactical:

This is one of the kinds of articles that I wish were more generally available online.  It provides the kind of information which helps people decide that maybe they CAN shoot "competitively", and at the same time it allays qualms that a person is "not good enough" to compete in an organized match.

Starting something new can be intimidating.  When that new thing involves firearms and a timer, it can be overwhelming to get involved in if you don’t know where to start. Do not worry, young padawan, I am here to help.
 I’ve noticed a trend on local shooting forums where people will add a comment to a thread about a shooting match and say something like “I wish I could do that, but I’m not a good enough shot” or “I need more practice”, or something to that effect. Some of these people have been making the same comments for years. If you want to try competitive shooting, do it. Nobody cares how bad of a shot you are. Chances are, they will all be stuffing magazines, or BSing while you are shooting anyways. As long as you are safe, you will enjoy your time. You will also be surprised how fast you improve.
(H/T: GUNWIRE.COM)

Being able to shoot accurately is not necessarily a reason to NOT shoot competitively.  Nobody expects you to win every match, and you meet the nicest people on the range.

However, learning to shoot SAFELY is definitely a requirement.

Many gun clubs which sponsor competition matches offer training programs to prepare people to shoot safely.  Sometimes, the instructors of these classes also help you to learn to shoot accurately, as well.

Friday, July 11, 2014

Non-Lead Ammunition: The Norwegian Exception

" ... the simple fact is that it is vital we meet our responsibility to kill wild game in the most humane and effective way."
___________________________________________________

Shooting Wire:  (July 07 2014)

 PHOENIX - If you want to use non-lead ammunition for your hunt this year, now is the time to start shopping. The Arizona Game and Fish Department is expecting a repeat of last year's non-lead ammunition shortage this hunting season. Those intending to hunt big game in California or in condor areas in Arizona (Game Management Units 12A, 12B, 13A and 13B), are strongly encouraged to buy their non-lead ammunition supplies as soon as possible.
We haven't talked about this before, and I think it deserves some discussion.

This is obviously an issue for hunters, because both game animals and 'varmints' are, after being shot by hunters, subject to predation (when their injuries are not fatal) and scavenging (for carcasses) by other animals.

Yes, lead poisoning is a real danger.  Just like strychnine poisoning, the element moves up the food chain and often raptors are at the top of their own food chain.

As much as most hunters don't like the "No Lead-Based Ammunition" laws enacted by several states, we probably have to accept that this the wave of the future.   When you shoot a game animal,  using lead projectiles (this consequence is most common in shotgun pellets) and it is not a clean kill, the animal usually enters the food chain of scavengers.

(Note:  Benjamin Franklin was opposed to the acceptance of the American Bald Eagle as the National Emblem, or "Great Seal", because eagles are "creatures of low moral habits".  He preferred the Rattlesnake, probably as a reference to the "Don't Tread On Me", or "Gadsen" flag.)

Sounds reasonable, doesn't it?

Read on!

Shooting On The Move: "Unsafe as HELL"?

Pistol Training Video on a Treadmill | ThinBlueFlorida.com:
Okay, my first reaction was, “Wow, that’s gonna be unsafe as hell.” 
At 1:24 minutes into the vid, I was a bit mesmerized, though. Nice shooting, Mr. Harrington.
This is not a training method I would advocate, but it shows an excellent degree of skill.
(Emphasis added)

Video loaded by links from :ThinBlueFlorida
http://thinblueflorida.com/?p=7868

"Unsafe as Hell?"

Obviously THIS shooter doesn't think so ... and his sterling performance of "Shooting On The Move" certainly demonstrates that it can be done safely.

He hit what he shot at, every time.  He took the steel targets in order so that we could SEE what his next target was,

I didn't see anything that looked REMOTELY "unsafe" in this demonstration .. did you?

"Sorry Honey, you asked the wrong person the wrong question"

From a Private Email (FWD: FWD: FWD: etc .... you know how it goes)

This is spot on.
XXXX
"If we couldn't laugh, we would all go insane"

Every "FED UP" citizen from the West needs to watch this.
http://ozziesaffa.blogspot.com/2014/06/i-bet-she-regrets-asking-her-question.html
(or just CLICK THIS LINK)

This is a  controversial video.  Racist?  Maybe.  And the blogspot ... Racist?  Maybe.

But one man's Racist is another man's "Sojourner Truth".  When we're unable to speak out about our personal world view, if we worry about how our words will be received, if we take counsel of our fears ... then the world will never know how our treatment leads to resentment.   Sojourner Truth spoke out about her treatment, and voiced her resentment.

We're here to talk about politics and culture as much as about competition and ... well, rights.

One thing I have always tried to make clear is that I make no distinction between the First Amendment and the Second Amendment.  Unpopular opinions are no less valid because they aren't shared by "the majority", or (in other words) by the .....

 "... Seventy Percent of Americans  ...."


So you see ... it's easy to be less interested in what "Seventy Percent of Americans" think.

Perhaps it is wiser to be more interested in what the thirty percent (or perhaps even the 'three percent') think.



Comments invited.

The Agony and The Ecstasy

The Agony:

In Chicago, Gangland killings continue in an unprecedent rise of violence, while local police and politicians seem helpless to stem the flow of violence:
(July 10, 2014)
Amid gangland shootings, Chicago leaders call for federal resources | Fox News:
Jasmine Curry, a mother of five and five months pregnant, lay dead along Chicago’s Dan Ryan expressway Wednesday morning, the latest victim in Chicago’s epidemic of gunfire with a bullet to the head. It was uncommon that she was shot on the expressway, not uncommon that someone from her neighborhood was killed. In fact, Jasmine was not even the first person in her family to be gunned down.  
“Now I have to bury another child,” said her father, Pierre Curry, sometimes weeping, sometimes with a matter of fact callousness. “I had to bury my last-born last year. I have to bury my first-born this year.” The gangland vendettas raged on the South and West Sides of Chicago over the holiday weekend. Thirteen people were killed, another 58 wounded as the bullets flew. Police were fired on and in at least five incidents, they returned fire, killing two.


The Ecstasy:

MAYOR RAHM EMANUEL : We did a study last year after the Taste of Chicago, there was over a $100 million of economic impact creating hundreds and hundreds of jobs throughout the City of Chicago. We are making sure that people from all over the country, the City of Chicago, in the suburbs come see why Chicago has become the ‘Culinary Capital of the United States.’




He doesn't look smug to me 
Does he look smug to you?
Come on  that's not 'smug'!
 WILLIAM KELLY (REPORTER): Mr. Mayor, can you address the ‘Murder Capital’ moniker. We’ve been called the murder capital as well as the ‘Culinary Capital. ‘Can you please address the ‘Murder Capital’ moniker please?
EMANUEL PRESS AIDE TO REPORTER: I’m not…
REPORTER TO MAYOR’S AIDE: Is there anyone from the Mayor’s Office that can address the ‘Murder Capital’ moniker?
During Mayor Emanuel’s tour through the Taste of Chicago, Kelly continued to grill him on his failure to find a solution to the city’s murder epidemic ....

Okay, so maybe just a LITTLE smug ....

Thursday, July 10, 2014

NORTON: The Ultimate Geek

Everybody needs friend; geeks need online friends.  And my best, truest online friend is NORTON 360 Software.

Virus protection, virus profile updates on a regular basis, virus removal, protection against 'untrusted websites', auto-backup to protected websitesd ... woof woof, what Geek could want more.

This geek wants technical back-up that's reliable, on-call 24/7, and can fix what ails ya when something goes wrong.

And the thing about software is ... something ALWAYS goes wrong!

Norton 360 did the job on me today.  It decided that my other friends (all my browsers, including Firefox, Chrome, Explorer) were no longer "trusted sites".  As a consequence, when I started my nightly browsing, I had only "INTERNET CONNECTION NOT FOUND" responses.

I got on my new laptop (the old XP laptop was too antiquated to be functional under the old "XP" protocols, so I had to buy one that would run "MS 7 Professional) and I had Internet connections up the ying-yang.  Since the LAPTOP hadn't had Norton loaded yet, that proved that the problem wasn't with the modem. I called the Symantec Hotline and talked to Jiquad who had me uninstall NORTON, and when I had done so I called the next guy with the funny accent to tweak it so that my browsers were 'trusted'.

Perhaps I could have done all that by myself ... it's not that hard, because NORTON has web-based utilities to do all that stuff for me.

But what else did I spend $49 a year for, but efficient customer support?

Now I've got all my computer things working again, I still have no viruses, and I've learned the value of cultivating an air of incompetence.

Why should I do all the work?  I figure I'm maintaining a viable economy in India, and I can tell them about my ingrown toenail while they're trying to work.

I was technical support for decades.    Call it Payback.


Wednesday, July 09, 2014

Gun Control by Fiat: It's no longer "A Sign In The Window"

TrackingPoint Patents Technique To Disable Guns Near Schools and “Gun Free Zones” - The Firearm Blog:

TrackingPoint’s chairman John McHale applied for a patent (#20140182179) which describes an invention that can disable the trigger of guns, such as TrackingPoint’s smart rifles, if they are within school zones (1,000 ft. of a school), on the grounds of a federal facility or on the grounds of private business that bans private firearms. The patent was filed on December 31, 2012.
(H/T: Says Uncle)

Yes, I'm stealing from other blogs.

But I think it deserved an "expansion commentary".

(Not that the consequences are not already obvious.)

A few months ago there was a furor about the New Jersey law (established some time ago) that when a single firearm was offered on the market which featured "owner identification technology"  (you know, like the RFID Ring, or whatever), then New Jersey would only allow THAT make/model of gun to be sold in the state.

That lead to some really UGLY things, and a lot of gun-folks came down HARD on the gun store which had announced that they intended to become a retailer for that firearm.

It didn't look good in The Press.  The owner of the gun store found himself a target for his customers, who were outraged ... because he was establishing a precedent for Governmental infringement on the Second Amendment.

[There were 'side issues': (a) The law enabled The State to determine what make, model and caliber you could legally own;' (b) the firearm was only offered in .22 caliber, (c) nobody has yet determined that "owner identification technology", sometimes referred to a "New Age Technology",  was 100% reliable.  That is to say, maybe the OWNER couldn't find his ring, he didn't wear it all the time, or the RFID chip lost its mojo. Make up your own worst-scenarios.]

So ... yeah, gun owners are dubious about New Age Technology.

Now we're presented with another "New Thing".

This New Thing ... this "New Age Technology" ... allows a Third Person to arbitrarily define where and when a firearm may be discharged.

It doesn't do it by enforcement of existing laws, it doesn't do it by anything which might have been considered an "infringement" on the Second Amendment in the view of the Founding Fathers.

It does it by fiat.  Unilaterally. One-sided.  Some Other Dude Done It technology.

Remember that General Motors ONSTAR "option" ('compatible with 4G LTE')?  Yes, you have to pay for it. It can stop your car while you are driving down the freeway.  Isn't that a comfort?  Never mind the 'help in an emergency' and the other stuff ... the 'stop your car' thingie is built in, and you do not have an "Opt Out" option.  You don't have to be the one who orders it; they can do it without your help.

Oh, and if a governmental agency decides that's a good idea?  They'll do it for them.  Not for you ... for them.  The guy with a badge number gets to decide if you can drive your car.

If this new "New Age Technology" for guns becomes accepted, they can do that for your firearms, as well.

The invention uses a GPS or mobile phone towers to determine location, sensors to determine orientation and a mobile/radio network connection to download a list of “gun free” locations from a central database. McHale suggests that a “Gun Free Zone” database could be maintained by the BATFE.
The "PAG" (People Afraid of Guns) [I just invented the moniker] will doubtless laud the technological advance as a way to ensure 'Public Safety',

We'll accept that when the same restrictions are also applied to other threats to public safety, such as knives, hammers, and meat cleavers. And baseball bats (warning; graphic footage!)

And midgets.  (warning; stupid)

Tuesday, July 08, 2014

Soccer vs HS Football vs ... IPSC!

Soccer may be 'in,' but it's not an injury-free sport:
With all the recent coverage given to the World Cup, interest in soccer is frequently described as reaching a "tipping point." Even President Obama has done his part to popularize the sport: taking time out from his busy schedule to watch the U.S.-Germany match, playing soccer against a robot on his recent trip to Japan, and chatting with foreign leaders about the game's finer points. But the president appears unaware of the health risks. He has strongly warned Americans about the risks of playing football, going so far this year as saying, "I would not let my son play pro football." He hasn't offered such similar warnings about soccer.
Oh yeah.

Osama ... sorry, OBAMA hasn't seen the Geek  Blurb which is the BOILERPLATE sent to everyone who asks to be registered in the "Introduction to USPSA" class at ARPC.

There's a whole big slew of text sent in response, but the bottom line is this:

USPSA IS SAFER THAN HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL!
True fact.  Think about it.

Every year you read about some poor adolescent guy who goes out for football, and drops dead on the field.  It may be a Heart Attack (undiagnosed), Asthma, whatever ... kids try to be jocks, and the end up dead.  Sorry, that sounds rude and unfeeling but folks; if you let your kid play soccer, football, whatever, you may be sending them to their grave.

Not so Practical Pistol competition.

Let's compare:

How many kids have died playing high-school football this year?

Soldiers demand right to roll up sleeves; GENERALS turn blind eye. "Good Training!"

Army guns: Soldiers demand right to roll up sleeves | Fox News:

Spc. Milt Perkins and dozens of other Army soldiers are reportedly ready to roll — their sleeves, that is.
 Perkins, a 26-year-old operating room specialist for a combat support hospital, wants Army brass to allow him to roll up the sleeves of his Army Combat Uniform (ACU) to catch a hint of much-needed breeze at Louisiana’s Fort Polk. But Army soldiers have been denied that pleasure for roughly a decade, since the ACU replaced the Battle Dress Uniform. Troops in the other U.S. services, meanwhile, are allowed to roll their sleeves, most notably leading to the Marines’ “suns out, guns out” mantra.
 “I sweat every day when I walk to work,” Perkins told Army Times. “You get sticky.”
 Army officials told the newspaper that the ACU top was designed to protect soldiers' for
  “When it’s hot in Louisiana, we should be able to roll up our sleeves," Perkins said.
Oh Geez!

I remember being in NCO School in Georgia, in 1968.  We sweat in the morning and we sweat in the night, and the only thing that kept us going was the certainty that we would be in Viet Nam sometime in the next few months ... and this was Good Training!  We were suppose to spend some time in Panama, for "aclimation", but we never went there.  This was the closest the Army could come to Viet Nam, and we were glad to get the time suffering.  At least nobody was shooting at us.

And the Army encouraged us to Roll Up Our Sleeves!

Remember the 12-mile march we took in August, at Fort Benning?  We had a Green Beret dude marching with us ... he dropped out at the ten-mile mark.  He was too proud to roll up his sleeves.

The air was like wet cotton balls.  You couldn't breathe .. we all just wheezed.  And we sweat like frigging pigs!

When the march was over, I asked my buddy to turn in my rifle, 'cause I was too pooped to move.  I made the mistake of drinking half a canteen of water ... and I had cramps all night long, because that was the Wrong Thing To Do.  But I still fell asleep in my bunk, and I slept for 12 hours, until Reville the next morning.

Now the Army won't allow Grunts to roll up their sleeves .. because the new designed uniforms don't "look right" that way?

If you have never been in the Army, you probably wouldn't understand.  But that IS the way the Army works.  If it's regulations, it's STUPID!

The funny thing is, when they sent me to Viet Nam, we in The Field always drew our uniforms from the quartermaster corps.  They clothing they issued us was .. rags.  You never had all the buttons.  We never were issued underwear ... talk about a bunch of swinging dicks!

Elbows and knees out ... barely enough buttons to close our fly.  And the shirts?  we didn't mind that there were only one or two buttons, 'cause more exposure to our chests allowed us the ventilation that we needed very much.

We only had two pairs of socks, and we needed to change them twice a day to avoid Trench Foot. I came down with "Bamboo Poisoning" (horrid runny purple/yellow lesions on my arms, legs, hands, face and feet) which stayed with me for a year after I returned from 'overseas'.

But there were no policies then, about providing adequate uniforms to the troops in the field.

Apparently, the Army hasn't changed a bit.  If there is a way to make one's servitude more uncomfortable, the Generals will turn a Blind Eye to any suggestion to make it more comfortable to do our duty.

In truth, I can't imagine why the Army won't provide uniforms which are comfortable in "sultry climate" conditions.  The old story about "Good Training", I guess.

One thing is sure: the people who make the rules are, still, not the people who have to suffer.

You got to ask yourself why America is relying on a 'Volunteer Army' to defend this Nation.  If everybody knew what petty crap they would have to endure once they were 'admitted' into the Army, nobody would ever volunteer.

Damn sure *_I_* wouldn't!