The key word here is "STRONGER". The NRA is not more powerful, not more influential than our government.
Our government is filled with politicians, all seeking re-election to positions of power and influence, and often full of themselves. They want to be king-makers ... or kings in their own local barnyard. From the local level to the national, they pander to the voters to support their own personal careers. They campaign for re-election by saying anything which will give them one more vote. They'll say anything for that vote. I don't stoop to calling them all charletons but we know there are many in elected office.
Sure, most of them are honorable men and women, but some are selling tonic water from the back of a wagon. And you're buying their tonic water with your votes.
The National Rifle Association is a 'club' with five million members who have the odd notion that the Second Amendment is as important as the First Amendment (and all the others) and not coincidentally enjoy the "Shooting Sports"; which include hunting, competition, and personal defense according to the Constitution.
The difference between "Our Government" and "The NRA" is the Government is a group of people fighting for dominance. The NRA, on the other hand, is a group of people in (almost) complete agreement about their goals and their message. Their goal, and their message, is the Constitution of the United States of America.
If you will fight to defend the Second Amendment, you must necessarily fight for ALL of the Constitution.
There is infighting among congress and almost any other organized group; but the infighting within the NRA is almost always "technical". Lately, the controversy in this group is about "Bump Stocks"; which will be rancorous, but will not undermine their homogeneity of purpose: to defend the Constitutional rights of all Americans.
So when an obscure editorial comment (see below) complains about the NRA, our thought is that he should be complaining about the Government ... which cannot make a decision.
We've already made our decision, to defend our Constitution and (not incidentally) our Second Amendment Rights.
We don't expect "Leadership" from politicians. Their goal is to be re-elected, not to defend the Constitution. It's an effort for them to even find a way to pretend to care about the Constitution.
We don't expect "Leadership" from Europe. They don't a Constitution! There are no moral guidelines in Europe. They are a disparate bunch of tiny groups which cannot agree on anything, and their constant bickering relegates them to nothing more than background noise, like static from an FM radio tuned into a frequency which you can't clearly receive from Outback, Alaska.
A letter to the editor of a Florida newspaper insists that "The NRA is Stronger Than Our Government":
I think America is confused. We have no real leadership. Maybe we need to look to Europe for models of leadership on gun control and other issues.
When will Congress finally do something about the NRA, which has become stronger than our government, and enact and enforce stronger gun control laws? Every time there is a mass shooting we learn that someone fell down on the job, ignored significant warnings about the shooter, let important findings fall thru the cracks.
Why are lawmakers so afraid of the NRA? Get rid of every ineffective representative in Congress. I'm mad and I'm frustrated and I have to stop reading and watching the news. Let me know when we have a real president and lawmakers who really do love America more than their jobs.
Observers and lawmakers see the NRA as one of the top three most influential lobbying groups in Washington, DC. Over its history the organization has influenced legislation, participated in or initiated lawsuits, and endorsed or opposed various candidates.(Wikipedia)
NB: The author of this letter to the editor is someone who wants his government to treat him as a child to be coddled and protected. He is not someone who wants his government to protect his Constitutional Rights. He could stop reading and watching the news, and learn to love America for what it is. He chooses instead to take counsel of his fears. This is no country for old men. He could move to Europe, where they would be happy to give him no 'rights' but not ask what he can do for his country.