Wednesday, June 01, 2005

This Blog Condemned!

Our friend Barsoom notes that the Cogito Ergo Geek looks really really UGLY when using Internet Explorer (IE) as your browser.

Didn't use to be like that, until BLOGSPOT had a spot of trouble with their hardware last month. Since then, if you try to view this blog with IE, it spreads across two pages ... or more, if your display settings aren't fixed at 1024 x 768 pixels.

Funny about that. If you look at an individual article it shows up just fine.
(*click on the permalink, which is a timestamp at the end of each article on this blog.*)

But if you look at the jerrydgeek.blogspot.com whole-blog URL, IE can't handle it.

I'm working with blogspot.com to resolve this problem, but I have to say that IE is the only browser so far identified that has a problem with it.

If you don't like it, I don't blame you. However, there are things you can do about your browser environment to avoid the problem entirely. (No, I'm not telling you that your browser sucks, even if it does; I'm just saying there are alternatives.)

This blog, and all other websites I've viewed, show up just fine if you're using a Mozilla-based browser.

I would like to recommend Netscape. I've been using it for years, and among its advantages is the ability to open new webpages in a new 'tab', instead of a new window.

If you're interested, Netscape version 8.0 can be downloaded for free here. Or, you can spend less than ten bucks and they will send you the CD for version 8.0, which has just been released. (I pre-ordered the CD-only for $6.95 last month.)

In the movie "U.S. Marshalls", Tommy Lee Jones told Robert Downey Jr.
Get yourself a Glock, and get rid of that nickel-plated sissy-pistol. Put that back in your suit and don't take it out unless I tell you to.
I would never give that advice about pistols, but let me say this about browsers:
Get yourself a Netscape browser, and get rid of the nickel-plated sissy-browser. Put that back in your suit and don't take it out unless I tell you to.
I won't be telling you to use Microsoft products when there is a better software product available. And there is usually a better software product available.

But don't get me started.

Tuesday, May 31, 2005

Evil Amerika



Do you have the stomach for one more disgusting article?

Neither do I. But I find 'em, I share 'em with you.

This one from (surprise!) The Moscow Times. It's an 'opinion' article:


CONTEXT - This Week in Arts and Ideas from The Moscow Times

("Arts and Ideas"? Give me a break!)

The author's name is cited as "Chris Floyd", and you wonder what someone with such an anglicized name is doing writing to the Moscow Times. Well, it ain't Glasnost!

Seymour Hersh, chronicler of madness from the My Lai massacre to Abu Ghraib, tells a chilling story of the lingering aftermath of atrocity.

As the revelations of brutal torture by the victors were first spilling from conquered Iraq, Hersh was contacted by a family member of a young U.S. woman who had served in a unit policing Abu Ghraib, the Guardian reports. The young soldier had "come back a different person," the relative said: distraught and angry, turning her back on her family.

The relative retrieved a computer she'd lent the soldier to use in Iraq -- and found there a file crammed with torture porn: photo after photo of a naked Iraqi prisoner writhing before the onslaught of fierce police dogs. One of the pictures was later published and became an emblem of the dehumanizing brutality of the U.S. occupation.

The young soldier thought she'd been sent to fight for democracy and freedom, the relative told Hersh, but it was a lie. Instead she found herself in Hell, committing crimes, violating her own nature, her sense of duty perverted by leaders who twisted it into a weapon to serve aggressive war. Since her return, said the relative, the young soldier keeps getting black tattoos, more and more of them, slowly covering her entire body -- literally trying to change her skin.

The fate of this soul-broken, tormented daughter of America embodies the nation itself under the malevolent reign of President George W. Bush. The whole country is changing its skin, trying to cloak its complicity and shame with a wilful disfigurement. Who could look on the hideous form of Bush's America -- the snarling faces belching rancor on Fox News; the rabid partisans oozing bile through the halls of Congress; the money-glutting religious extremists relentlessly pushing ignorance, intolerance and theocratic dominion; the corporate beasts devouring the landscape, destroying communities, writing their own laws, gorging on unprecedented profits wrung from global sweatshops, corruption and war; the somnolent, silent, acquiescent public, blankly countenancing torture, deceit, military aggression and the destruction of their constitutional order -- and not see in all this a body politic in profound psychological crisis: traumatized, guilt-ridden, turning itself inside out in a frantic attempt to escape the truth?


And this desperation only grows as the truth piles up, fragment by fragment, dug out from Bush's slagheap of lies. In the past month, there has been a barrage of "smoking guns" outlining the Regime's criminality in such stark and blatant terms that even the U.S. corporate media -- those cringing enablers of atrocity -- have been forced to take some notice.


Take a break, Pal.
In 1970, I came back from Vietnam "distraught and angry" and found myself turning my back on my family.

But it wasn't because I had been leading naked VietCong around on a leash; it was because I had seen too many friends killed by the VietCong. It took me a while to regain my perspective, and to realize that my grief was alienating me from civilized society. It's a thing that happens, and stable people learn to (a) not sucumb to savagery in the midst of war, and (b) not assume that everyone is your enemy.

The young woman in question apparently didn't have sufficient moral guidance to make the simple step from the Senior Prom to (a). That, or the entire article is based on lies. Either is possible.

I find it interesting that no names, no second sources, are cited. I'm inclined to believe that the author is engaging in a flight of America-hating fantasy.

"The fate of this soul-broken, tormented daughter of America embodies the nation itself under the malevolent reign of President George W. Bush."
Was this written by Teddy Kennedy? This guy has a real boner for Bush and America, doesn't he?

... the hideous form of Bush's America ...

This guy is from out-of-town. He may or may not be a charter subscriber to "Le Figaro" (the French magazine which is too arrogant to provide an english edition on the internet), but he is surely getting his information from some America-hating source.

Well, even the French can't be all bad. They rejected the EU constitution, didn't they?

Okay, I'm about burned out on this puppy. You can go read the whole thing by clicking on the link at the top of the page, but here's the last gasp from the guy who apparently did what Alex Baldwin didn't have the guts to do ... move to a country which really appreciated him:

We have reported here in great detail on the voluminous evidence establishing that the endemic, systematic torture in Bush's gulag was instigated by the White House, sanctioned by Bush's appointed "legal experts" who ruled that as commander in chief, he is not constrained by laws against torture -- or, indeed, by any law whatsoever. Equally copious evidence establishes that Rumsfeld and selected Pentagon officials eagerly implemented the torture regimen -- then systematically worked to block or limit investigations once the truth began leaking out. For example, one of the low-ranking "bad apples" finally convicted in the Afghan murders -- after extended Pentagon cover-ups -- was sentenced to just three months in jail by a military court this week, The Associated Press reports. Three months for helping beat a chained, helpless man to death.
Oh, wait. One more thing. The webpage (disengenuously) invites you to write to them if you are 'startled' by the contents:

To Our Readers

Has something you've read here startled you? Are you angry, excited, puzzled or pleased? Do you have ideas to improve our coverage?
Then please write to us.
All we ask is that you include your full name, the name of the city from which you are writing and a contact telephone number in case we need to get in touch.
We look forward to hearing from you.


Yeah, right. Like I'm going to give you my name, address and phone number, Ivan.
Sheesh!

Danegeld, by Rudyard Kipling - A.D. 980-1016

It's Kipling Night!

This time, I'm not typing the whole poem because I've found someone else who has done the 'data entry' thingie for me.


Danegeld, by Rudyard Kipling - A.D. 980-1016

IT IS always a temptation to an armed and agile nation,
To call upon a neighbour and to say:
"We invaded you last night - we are quite prepared to fight,
Unless you pay us cash to go away."

And that is called asking for Dane-geld,
And the people who ask it explain
That you’ve only to pay ’em the Dane-geld
And then you’ll get rid of the Dane!

It is always a temptation to a rich and lazy nation,
To puff and look important and to say:
"Though we know we should defeat you, we have not the time to meet you.
We will therefore pay you cash to go away."

And that is called paying the Dane-geld;
But we’ve proved it again and again,
That if once you have paid him the Dane-geld
You never get rid of the Dane.

It is wrong to put temptation in the path of any nation,
For fear they should succumb and go astray,
So when you are requested to pay up or be molested,
You will find it better policy to say:

"We never pay any one Dane-geld,
No matter how trifling the cost,
For the end of that game is oppression and shame,
And the nation that plays it is lost!"
It's easy to apply this lesson to RealPolitiks in today's world. Think of the Iraqi war, the War on Terrorism, and you will know that the question is not one which was ultimately resolved in the past millenium ... or the one before that. It's a problem which will haunt us forever: Whether it is better to pay the Danegeld, and learn to live with the Danes; or to fight the 'Danes' at every opportunity.

The 'Danes' are those vandals who predate innocents. One thousand years ago it was the Danes (the Vikings, coastal raiders, whomever). We in America dealt with the Barbary Pirates in the Mediterranean two centurys ago, because we then refused to pay them tribute ... DaneGeld.

But there's a much more recent example of the problem with paying DaneGeld. It is the slaying of innocents in Isreal. Can the Israelis ... can we ... afford to buy off terrorists by giving in to their demands for territory?

Here are two victims of terrorism. Let's give the victim a face, and put a name to the act.



Daniel Pipes supports the concept that there is no reasonable alternative to fighting the Danes. Or, as our modern world names it, Jihad.

"... if once you have paid him the Dane-geld
You never get rid of the Dane."

Guests From Hell!

WFTV.com - News - Man Lights His Own Home On Fire To Make Guests Leave

Didja ever have days like this?


GENEVA, Ill. -- Some people will do just about anything to get unwanted house guests to leave. But police say Dean Craig went too far.

Craig, 46, was charged with felony arson after allegedly splashing rubbing alcohol on the floor of his home and igniting it with a lighter early Sunday, the Kane County Sheriff's office said.

Nobody was injured. Police say Craig had asked two unwanted visitors to leave, but they refused. Then he allegedly carried out a threat to light the house on fire.

Craig was being held on $25,000 bond. He is scheduled to appear in court on June 9.


I'll bet my friend Randomly Hitten' felt like this when we stretched his BBQ out for seven hours last weekend.

Sunday, May 29, 2005

The BBQ, and the Irish Dance Troupe

One of our IPSC group of Olde Fogies (known locally as "The Usual Suspects") who typically squad together at matches has been pursuing 'other interests' for the past several months, and consequently we have missed his company at matches.

Accordingly, Randomly Hittin' Witten decided to host a BBQ at his home on Sunday, May 29. He chose this day, I presume, because it fell during a 3-day weekend. It was only a coincidence of timing the the weekend was Memorial Day Weekend, and a further coincidence that most couples included at least one veteran. Still, we were glad to spend the day in the company of friends with similar backgrounds and experiences, and values, which may partially explain why we were originally drawn to each other and established fast friendships. Weekend BBQ gatherings are not unusual for this group, and over the years we have also discovered a common appreciation for the finest things in life ... not the least is a liking of Jamisons Irish Whiskey, since Randomly Hittin' and "The O'shea" share an Irish Heritage, and I pride my self on being one-quarter on my father's side.

(My paternal grandmother was born a Dildine, and while I have no idea what was the County of her origin, there's enough Irish here to appreciate all things Irish. Especially the whiskey, and especially while I can be assured that I'm not the only participant who will arrive at any BBQ with a green bottle in hand.)

In celebration of the partial Celtic origins of our group, Randomly arranged some entertainment. One of his neighbors was a member of an Irish Dance Troupe, and he asked if she could schedule a performance at the BBQ. Mary, a charming leprechaun of many years experience, was happy to oblige. The BBQ started at noon ... I was a half hour late.

The Irish Dance Troupe was scheduled for 2pm, after the end of the meal. They were a half hour late. The only reasonable conclusion to tardiness is that it is an Irish national trait. It's not my fault I'm always late. I find some comfort in that cultural abrogation of my inherently bad sense of time, and the fact that The O'Shea showed up on time fails to disuade me from my comfortable conclusion.

There were four members of the troup in attendance. There are about 20 members of the troupe, but everyone else had other things to do (including one selfish individual who reportedly was getting married and chose this weekend to go back to The Olde Sod to meet the family of his prospective wive.) However, they had a fifth person with them; "Bob" was from Dublin, and while we had no idea how he had come to join the troupe for this event, we were glad to see him.
Bob brought his wife. A married couple in the troupe brought their son Patric (all of the regular troupe members were wearing emerald green kilts), Mary brought two of her grand-daughters, and there were a couple of other people who were not clearly identified. No matter, we were glad to have them, plenty of food available but we only had two bottles of Jamisons, which we hid. You can't be too careful with fine whiskey around the Irish.

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Oh, and one of them brought their dog ... a bob-tailed German Shepherd named Mariah. More on Mariah in a minute.

The troupe brought a Karaoke machine, and they set it up on the back porch. The porch would be their stage, and we the audience were arrayed around the porch were we could relax comfortably in our patio chairs while they performed.

Unfortunately, there were no chairs available for the troupe members while various of them performed, so they generally sat on the low brick retaining wall ... next to the fish pond.

One of the first acts was Bob from Dublin quoting a very sad poem by the great Irish poet, Keats. In the middle of the act, Mariah chased a ball into the fish pond. Mariah is a water dog, we learned, and she very much enjoyed thrashing around the pond. We watched while the idle troupe members solemnly sponged water and duck-weed off the emerald green kilt of the lone costumed regular member of the troupe and Bob from Dublin continued his morose poetry. Hearing a choking sound beside me, I turned to see Randomly cramming his hand into his mouth, up to the wrist, in a solemn and respectful effort to resist the nearly overwhelming impulse to laugh. Bravo to Randomly for his appreciation for the solemnity of the moment.

The troupe demonstrated Jigs, Reels, and various other dance routines. Unfortunately, there were only the four regular (costumed) troupe members, and Bob from Dublin, so they were forced to draft on-hand family members to fill out the tradition six-person routines. Usually, they called upon one of Mary's grand-daughters who was invariably cast as 'a man'. I understand that there are to be 3 women and 3 men in the dances, and she graciously accepted the role of 'a man'. There was some discussion of who was 'a man' and who was 'a woman'. Bob from Dublin asserted that he was pretty sure he was a man, and as nobody present was willing to challenge the assertion, he danced in that role during the entire performance.

Someone suggested that Mary sing. Mary's granddaughter objected vociferously, stating that "I've heard her sing since I was this big, and believe me you do NOT want to hear Grandmother sing!" Later, Mary presented a short explanation about why she wasn't allowed to sing. When she was in High School, she was in Choir. During one recital, her teacher approached her and said "Mary, if you'll just mouth the words without singing, I'll give you a 'C' for the year. Mary responded: "A 'C'? No deal. You'll give me an 'A' for the year, or I'm singin'!"

Lydia, the high-stepper of the group (and who apparently was an instructor of Irish dancing) played a piece on the tin whistle. I had never seen an actual 'tin whistle', and I was surprised at the range which she was able to find in the one-and-a-half octaves available.

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Taking requests, the troupe attempted to sing "Danny Boy". They couldn't remember the words, so after a minute they quit. Too bad; I thought they were doing just fine. I don't remember the words either, but if they had continued I was going to request "Who Threw The Overalls In Mrs Murphy's Chowder", some of the words to which I DO know (if not the tune). I bet they knew the words too, but were too dignified to suggest it themselves.

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

As the last act of the performance, the troupe declared that they were going to teach the audience an Irish circle dance. Being the designated photographer (designated by myself), I remained behind. I have 2:44 minutes of film depicting my friends dancing an Irish Reel. It is for sale to the highest bidder, which I assume will be one of the friends I photographed.

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

The performance ended far too soon.

We still had some Jamison's left.

Saturday, May 28, 2005

Ducks In A Barrel

In my previous article on the Basketball stage, I promised to discuss our efforts to ensure that Range Officers would not apply procedural penalties inconsistently. Of course, nobody could have forseen that two entire squads of experienced shooters would fail to apply stipulated penalties. (We had no dedicated Range Officers; all ROs were competing members of the squads. The MD read the penalty as part of the stage walk-through, but apparently it just didn't register on the conscious mind of many participants.)

During conversations between the Match Director, "Barsoom", and myself, we did note that the classifier chosen for the match, "Ducks In A Barrel" (CM 03-01) stipulated order of engagement. This was an 8-round short course featuring 3 IPSC targets and two Pepper Popper targets. The steel Pepper Popper targets were to be engaged through a barrel, the paper IPSC targets were to be engaged outside of the barrel. The stage procedures read: "Engage the IPSC targets, THEN engage the steel targets."

(emphasis added)

We first questioned whether this explicit order-of-engagement was intentional and necessary. Querying THe Unofficial IPSC List, I learned that this question had already been addressed (via the Brian Enos Forums) to John Amidon, VP of the United States Practical Shooting Association (USPSA) and head of the National Range Officer Institute of USPSA. His response was clear and unequivocal:

While it may seem as "what difference does it make what order they are engaged in" some classifiers have a specific engagement order, as in this one. The word "then" stipulates that order.
(Please note that the Brian Enos Forum thread included an image of the stage procedure document ... thank you FLEXMONEY.)

We noticed, in reading the forum thread, that several people had already shot this classifier and, not understancing the issues, the Range Officers had allowed them to violate the procedural stipulation and had failed to assign ANY penalties when the targets were engaged 'out of order'. These classifier scores were submitted to USPSA. Lacking any information which would suggest that the scores were not correct, USPSA corrected them and the reported scores were applied to the classification average for everyone who shot the classifier.

Next we wondered what procedural penalties SHOULD be applied. The question was whether a single penalty should be applied, or if 'per shot' penalties should apply. Having no other authoritative guidance, I wrote to John Amidon for a clarification. His response was quick, but I found it difficult to understand whether a single or multiple penalties should be applied under specific circumstances.

" ... the first responsibility to shoot the stage properly, is the competitor, the second is the match staff, they are also advised in the classifier book sent out, that if they have any questions on set up, to call before the match. The issue of how many procedurals is never a cut and dry thing, but if you keep in mind, to stop and think as an RO, before issuing the penalties, a viable solution is usually there."
To this, I attempted to apply existant USPSA rules regarding 'advantage gained'. I decided that there were no rules which applied 'per shot' penalties on more than one target: the only advantage to shooting the paper before the steel, in any combination, was that the Pepper Poppers were set up one behind another. There was a certain delay while waiting for the 'front' popper to fall far enough that the competitor could engage the 'rear' popper, and some competitors were using that time to index over to one or more paper targets and then back for the 'rear' popper. There was an advantage gained in that they may have been able to complete the index away, and the index back, in less time than they had spent waiting for the 'front' popper to fall. However it only applied an advantage in engaging the 'rear' popper, not in engaging any of the IPSC targets.

After I had communicated my decision to Mr. Amidon, and having received no corrections to my reasoning, I decided that a single penalty was sufficient under any circumstances. I communicated this decision to Barsoom, the Match Director, and he agreed that it was certainly sufficient in a 40-point classifier stage.

On match day, I learned that USPSA had decided that the classifier had been compromised by previous inconsistent application of penalties, and USPSA had pulled the classifier from the classifier book ... the day before the match!

Barsoom discovered this in time to substitute another similar classifier, and this is the one which was presented at our Columbia Cascade Section Points Match.

Considering that this classifier ALSO featured a barrel set so that the top of the barrel was only three feet above the ground, nobody was disappointed in the change ...

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

... although most of us found it very difficult to shoot an open gun through the barrel while staying in the shooting box, because of the backblast.

I'm learning to enjoy my tenure as a Section volunteer. The most interesting things happen behind the scenes.

Jerry the Gamer

This was posted on The Unofficial IPSC List by 'friend' and shooting pal Mark O. after the IPSC match at Dundee on Saturday:
Jerry the Geek heretofore known as Jerry the Gamer, earned his new moniker in a points match yesterday. In a stage where one had to carry a deflated basketball and drop it in one of two buckets before the last shot or suffer a procedural he simply dropped the ball on the ground and took the procedural. Now this wasn’t so bad except that unbeknownst to the rest of us unimaginative rule-followers he had an email conversation with the MD in which this was discussed and he didn’t share it with the rest of the sheep squad. Now this is particularly heinous since he is the section competition director and was using inside information. Hence he shall be known now and forever as “The Gamer”.
In my own defense, I can only say that every word is true.

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us
[photo credit: Mark O'Shea]
(Click on the image to see the full-size photo. Please ignore the incorrect date stamped on the photo ... it was taken May 28, 2005. Also be advised that there is a terrible sun-glare from the fishbelly white GeekLegs.)


As you may have assumed, there's a story behind the story.

This was a "Points Match", where we compete within the section for an annual award ... a reduced price 'slot' to the U.S. Nationals. As section Competition Director, I'm charged with evaluating all stages for the Points Match series to insure that there are no safety concerns on any of the stages, and also to ensure that competition rules are not violated by any element of the stage designs. (We watch for long-courses where all targets can be engaged from a single location or view, or more than 9 shots are required from a single location or view, etc.) Also, we work together with the stage designer to avoid controversy on stages, such as the possiblity that different Range Officers may assign procedural penalties inconsistently. (More on that later.)

This stage, designed by "Barsoom" and which was an acknowledged rip-off of an Area 1 stage, required the competitor to start with a basketball in hand, and to deposit the basketball into a basket before the last shot was fired. Barsoom and I discussed the stage design elements to make sure that the competitor, if he lost control of the basketball, would not commit an unsafe act by trying to chase a rolling/bouncing basketball around the stage while holding a loaded pistol in one hand. We compromised on a DEFLATED basketball, and using half-cut plastic barrels for the 'basket'. We decided that this would make it very easy to insure that the basketball could be relatively easy to handle, and would not bounce out of the basket nor tip it over.

Finally Barsoom brought up the number of procedural penatlies to assign if the competitor failed to follow the stage procedures ... "the basketball must be in one of the two baskets before the last shot is fired". He had originally written that only one procedural penalty should applied, because it seemed far too cheap a price to warrant ignoring the procedural requirement. We finally decided that, yes, it WAS an advantage to take one penalty, and in return run the 30-yard 26-round stage completely unencumbered by props. "But what the heck, IPSC is suppose to be free-style, and it will be interesting to see how many people realize that you can shoot the stage any way you want to if you think it's worth the penalty".

When my squad shot that stage, I was (by luck of the draw) 9th out of the ten squad-members to shoot the stage.

We watched everybody fumbling with the ball. Some people ran to the first of two baskets, deposit the ball, shoot the closest array, then have to retreat to engage an array which was then uprange of them. Others kept the ball in their possession until they got to the 2nd basket, near the last array, rather than to cross the bay to deposit the ball in the basket closer to the starting position.

One very good A-L10 shooter scampered down to the first basket and hurled the ball into the basket ... and missed the basket. He had to run another few steps down range, pick up the ball, run backwards with the ball in one hand and his gun-hand trailing downrange, to the point where he could safely deposit the ball in the basket. THEN he had to retreat even further downrange, and across the bay, to engage the earlier array.

Shooting encumbered, some people had to take extra make-up shots at some targets; they became so concerned over not losing control of the ball, they forgot that they had shot more rounds than they had planned and consequently ran out of rounds at the last array. They had to do a standing reload to complete the stage.

When I dropped the ball as soon as the buzzer started my run, I was able to treat the stage as a straight 'hoser stage'. Thirteen seconds was a good time for that stage; on the other hand, running the stage with the ball resulted in times of around 20 seconds.

This caused a bit of furor in my squad. I learned that The Usual Suspects can be quite creative in inventing names for 'former friends'. The term "Jerry the Gamer" involved the least invective, and certainly was least questioning of my masculinity and parentage.

Other squads had somewhat different experiences. Near the end of the match, the Section Coordinator informed me that two squads had noted the advantage in not following the procedures, and they had (quite reasonably) ran the stage without the encumbrance of carrying a prop. However, they had neglected to apply the mandatory one penalty ... clearly stipulated in the stage procedures ... for this choice. Since there was no way we could require those two squads to reshoot the stage, we made the decision, albeit reluctantly, to throw the stage out. Too bad, it was my best stage; but I had to concur that we had no choice in the matter.

The rest of my squad, for some reason, found some obscure satisfaction in this turn of events. I attribute this to an unfortunate tendency toward schadenfreude in their personalities, but I can't blame them for their indulgence.

Thursday, May 26, 2005

The Other Day

Okay, here's a first.
NOT blogging a bill, NOT blogging a news article. Today I'm blogging in praise of anothera blogger.

GeekWithA.45 has been a permanent fixture on my sidebar since Day One.

This day (my Bro-In-Law's Birthday ... Happy Birthday John!) The GeekWithA.45 has written what I consider to be the finest example of RKBA activism I've ever seen.

I'll not waste your time by gilding the lily. It's short, and it's worth the read.


The Other Day

Wednesday, May 25, 2005

Concealed Carry Permit: License To Be Burgled

Cowboy Blob's Saloon, Sanitarium, and Shootin Gallery: Countertop is on Fire!

So, you've got your Carry Concealed Handgun permet, and now you're feeing like the Cats' Pajamas. You are carrying in Stealth Mode, right?

Wrong!

Concealed Carry is only 'stealthy' if nobody knows you're packing.

(Obvious Hat Tip to Cowboy Blob, and Countertop)

This asshole is the publisher of the Northwest Florida Daily News.

Tom Conner
792 Gary Player Ln
SHALIMAR, FL 32579
850-651-0164

The other day they decided to publish the names and adresses of all of Florida's Concealed Carry Permit Holders. In the interest of fairplay, I've decided to publish his home address and phone number too.
(ripped from COUNTERTOP's blogsite)

Hey, you know what?

Unless there are severe legal restrictions to CCW or CCH permit information, they can do this in YOUR state, too!

I have no idea whether that information is accessible in MY state, but I would be willing to bet that it could be done.

Kinda takes the romance out of concealed carry, doesn't it?

This may have been the reason why Tom Conner, of 792 Gary Player Lane; Shalimar, Florida 32879 (home phone 850 651-0164) decided to publish the information.


Note:
Open Carry is not the answer, either. See the latest chapter in the continuing story of FishOrMan who was arrested after a traffic stop, openly carrying in his car .. and also, on another incident, in the local Fred Meyers store. He is currently fighting the second legal action, and has pled on the first incident which cost him $925 plus forfeiture of the firearm.

Not wise to be too bold.

"Air America" Shot Down In Flames

New York City: Comic files suit against 'Air America Radio' over pay

I'll bet this sounds like gloating.

Well, so be it. I'm gloating.

These losers were in 'content' trouble from Day One, and in Financial trouble from Day Two.

"America's Progressive Talk Radio Network" was conceived for one reason: to provide a talk radio format for Progressive/Liberal/Democrat radio listeners, and in the process to steal listeners from Rush Limbaugh, Hugh Hewitt, Michael Reagan, Sean Hannity, Larry Elder, Michael Medved, Dennis Prager, my local (oregon) host Lars Larson, and a plethora of other 'Conservative' talk radio hosts.

(I'm not forgetting Michael Savage: I just can't stand him, and while I can't avoid mentioning him I certainly won't provide a link to his website on my blog. Some people are just too obnoxious for words, and these are the last words you'll read here about this mouthy twerp.)

Anyway, Air America was predicated on the proposition that there is a huge number of Liberal radio listeners who are desparate for a talk show which represents their political views, and this new 'silent majority' will flock to anyone who will provide them a forum. They can sell commercials, .....

Nope.

Liberals would rather call CONSERVATIVE talk shows, and argue with the host. They don't want to talk to people who agree with them; they just want to demonstrate their superiority over anyone who disagrees with them, and they also want to express their hatred for the host (and the host's demented followers). Maybe they think they can 'win hearts and minds' with their clever reparte'.

So far, it hasn't happened. But the liberal callers never quit trying; part of the schtick is that they are so obviously right, they don't need to be reasonable. This may be a partial explanation for why they are the minority in the house, the senate, recent gubenatorial races, and why Al Gore lost the 2000 presidential election and John "I willrelease my military records" Keary lost in 2004.

Air America started out with umpteen stations ... and within a month they lost half of them for lack of funding. Read: nobody was buying commercials.
Why?
Nobody was listening.

After they leaned up, they were going strong with a few stations. (I'm embarassed to mention that an Oregon station still carries the show, which is a waste of innocent Bandwidth.)

Al Franken is still gibbering shamelessly. Randi Rhodes is blithering along.

But you won't be hearing from Liz Winstead. (Lizz?)

The Comedienne has been stiffed, big-time.

Comic Lizz Winstead doesn't think Air America Radio was very liberal with her severance and other pay.

Winstead, who helped create Comedy Central's "Daily Show" and went on to develop Air America Radio, filed suit in State Supreme Court in Manhattan Monday against owners of the liberal network, which is a counteroffensive to conservative talk radio.

She claimed that Air America and Piquant LCLC, the latest owner of the year-old network, did not pay her for work as an on-air announcer. She said she also was not given the severance due her as an executive after she was fired in March.
They fired a LIBERAL?

Couldn't they feel her pain?

Winstead, who had a base salary of $250,000, claimed in her lawsuit that she didn't receive four months' severance pay of $83,333, unused vacation time of $14,423 and $200,000 for her on-air work.

Winstead hosted a show called "Unfiltered," with Chuck D. It was part of a network line-up that includes Al Franken created to combat the likes of conservative talk show hosts Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity.
Adding it all up, it looks like she has been shorted (by her count) well over half a MILLION Dollar$.

That's more than I make in a year. Or ten.

It sounds as if pimping for the libs is profitable ... unless they decide to sign the contract and then not honor it. Oh well, that's the libs for you.

As Lew Rawls once sang:
"Oh shut up, silly woman"
said the reptile with a grin,
"You knew darned well I was a snake before you took me in."
But there's more ....
In addition, Winstead claimed she never received money due for her on-air promotional work for the Vermont Teddy Bear Co.
Who could be so heartless that they would smudge the Vermont Teddy Bear Company?

Certainly not this demented twit.


I'm sorry.

Tuesday, May 24, 2005

Blogspot down! Oops! It's Back!

IN case you hadn't noticed, the Cogito Ergo Geek was not available for viewing for a part of Tuesday, May 24. This was a problem which originated with the host (www.blogger.com).

Since you can read this, they have obviously fixed their problem. It didn't affect everyone, but it clobbered me.

It forced me to realize how much I depend on this blog. Not only does it provide me a forum to spew my demented rants, but it also is the source of ALL my favorite links.

If you have some links that you go to frequently, perhaps you could suggest them. I'll load the most popular to my sidebar, making it even easier to go to Cogito Ergo Geek on your way to your regular evening net-surfing regimen.

If you have any suggestions for a subject, I get more fun out of researching a topic and providing pertinent references than a collegial MS candidate. Let me know what seems interesting. (If you can't think of anything specific, go look at the Sondra K website. It should give you some ideas.)

Monday, May 23, 2005

Kipling: a tribute to a master

I think I'll make one day a week "Kipling Day".

Rudyard Kipling is one of the most unappreciated writers of English-language literature in the world. All of us have heard the name (and if you haven't, you should broaden your horizons.) Most of us think little of him, except that we may have seen "The Jungle Book", which is a Disney movie, or read "KIM". Or "Rikki-Tikki-Tavi", or some other story of his which is generally considered a 'childrens story'.

The truth is, Kipling (1895 - 1936) didn't really write for children. Mostly, he wrote about the area of human conflict.

Kipling wrote about war.

Did you never see the movie "The Man Who Would Be King", starring Michael Caine and Sean Connery? It's a story about two British soldiers, around the turn of the century in 'Kafiristan' (Afghanistan? The Khyber Pass?) who are mistaken for gods ... with a disastrous and gruesome ending.

Ever hear of "Captains Courageous"? "Gunga Din"? "Wee Willie Winkle"?

Kipling wrote all of these, and more. Much, much more.

Last year, I was fortunate to find a 9-volume set of Kipling's writings in a used book store. I bought them for $35 dollars ... a steal at five times the price! For example, Volume I includes:
  • Soldiers Three
  • The Story of the Gadsbys.
  • In Black And White
Well, perhaps you haven't heard of these stories. "Soldiers Three was the basis for at least 4 movies, from 1913 to 2003.

Perhaps more important, Kipling wrote poems. He wrote 'Barracks Rooms Ballads'. He wrote ... and wrote ... and wrote!

After I started reading Kipling in earnest, I discovered an almost fatal flaw in the 9-volume series I had bought. This set of Kipling was published in 1895. The literature was set, but Kipling kept on writing!

I bought a couple more Kipling anthologies from Amazon dot com, and discovered that after his son was killed in WWI, Kipling senior became very disenchanted with war and its conduct. Some of his best writing was done AFTER WWI.

But still: his poems ... his poems captured the very essence of the fighting man and what it is like to be the very bottom of the food chain in a battle.

And some of them, perhaps even most of the, are entirely applicable to the present.

Consider "The Young British Soldier", which ends:
When you're wounded and left on Afghanistan's plains,
And the women come out to cut up what remains,
Jest roll to your rifle and blow out your brains
An' go to your Gawd like a soldier.
(Geirge Dzundza's character learned this in the movie "The Beast Of War".)

As a tickler to your memory, perhaps you will recall this ending to "Gunga Din":
Though I've belted you and flayed you,
By the livin' Gawd that made you,
You're a better man than I am, Gunga Din!
I was going to end this piece with "Snarleyow", from "Barracks Rooms Ballads". I think you should read it, certainly, and think about what it really says. But for this moment, it may be better to make another choice to quote here in full. I can't find this reproduced anywhere else on the Internet.

Perhaps that is because it is so long.
Perhpas because it is really not Politically Correct in concept or in choice of words.

Or perhaps because it is so gruesome.


"The Grave of the 100 Head"
-Rudyard Kipling


There's a widow in sleepy Chester
Who weeps for her only son;
There's a grave on the Pabeng River,
A grave that the Bumans shun;
And there's Subadar Prag Tewarri,
Who tells how the work was done.

A Snider squbbed in the jungle
Somebody laughed and fled,
and the men of the First Shikaris
Picked up their Subaltern dead,
With a big blue mark in his forehead,
And the back blown out of his head.

Subadar Prag Twarri,
Jemadar Hira Lal,
Took command of the party,
Twenty rifles in all.
Marched them down to the river
As the day was beginning to fall.

They buried the boy by the river
A blanket over his face --
They wept for their dead Lieutenant,
The men of an alien race --
They made a samadh in his honor,
A mark for his resting-place.

For they swore by the Holy Water,
They swore by the salt they ate,
That the soul of Liutenant Eshmitt Sahib
should go to his God in state,
With fifty file of Burmans
To open him Heaven's Gate.

The men of the First Shikaris
Marched til the break of day,
Till they came to the rebel village,
The village of Pabengmay--
A jingal covered the clearing,
Calthrops hampered the way.

Subadar Prag Tewarri,
Bidding them load with ball,
Halted a dozen rifles
Under the village wall;
sent out a flanking-party
With Jemadar Hira Lol.

The men of the First Shikaris
Shouted and smote and slew,
Turning the grinning jingal
On to the howling crew.
The jemadar's flanking-party
Butchered the folk who flew.

Long was the morn of slaughter,
Long was the list of slain,
Five score heads were taken,
Fiver score heads and twain;
and the men of the First Shikaris
Went back to their grave again,

Each man bearing a basket
Red as his palms that day,
Red as the blazing village --
The village of Pabengmay.
And the "drip-drip-drip" from the baskets
Reddened the grass by the way.

They made a pile of their trophies
High as a tall man's chin,
Head upon head distorted,
Set in a sightless grin,
Anger and pain and terror
Stamped on the smoke-scorched skin.

Subadar Prat Tewarri
Put the head of the Boh
On top of the mound of triumph,
The head of his son below --
With the sword and the peacock-banner
That the world might behold and know.

Thus the samadh was perfect,
Thus was the lesson plain
Of the wrath of the First Shikaris --
The price of a white man slain;
And the men of the First Shikaris
Went back into camp again.

Then a silence came to the river,
A hush fell over the shore,
and Bohs that were brave departed,
And Sniders squibbed no more;
For the Burmans said
That a white man's head
Must be paid for with heads five-score.

There's a widow in sleepy Chester
Who weeps for her only son;
There's a grave on the Pabeng River,
A grave that the Burmans shun;
And there's Subadr Prag Tewarri
Who tells how the work was done.


Saturday, May 21, 2005

AFTEC Extractor - Revisited

Almost six weeks ago (April 10, 2005) I wrote that I had broken my extractor and subsequently replaced it with an AFTEC extractor. I made several comments about the construction and installation of the part, and stated that I was very satisfied with its performance.

Unfortunately, I also cited some Internet rumors which suggested that installation of the AFTEC extractor required some gunsmithing. I thought I had made it clear that my experiences completely contradicted these statements

Specifically, in response to reports that installation required one to drill out the extractor channel before the AFTEC extractor would fit, I commented:

Either this description is VERY much out of date, or it is patent bullshit. I prefer to believe that this installation process is based on a very EARLY model of the Aftec extractor.

My experience was less traumatic. The Aftec dropped right in. The extractor channel didn't require any modification, and even the perennially Gunsmithing-Incompetent Geek was able to install the After-Market part without opening the dusty Dremel Tool box.
Someone read this article a couple of days ago, and apparently read the original rumor but missed my refutation.

It seems appropriate to say it again, for the third time: no modifications to the gun were required to install the AFTEC extractor. It was so simple, even a Geek can do it!


The original article was written after completion of a single IPSC match, which involved shooting less than 200 rounds. (Yes, I was so confident in the quality of the merchandise that I took it to a match without fully testing it in my STI pistol.)

Having competed in several more IPSC matches since installing the AFTEC extractor, it is perhaps appropriate that I reinforce my original short-term impression.

The AFTEC extractor performed flawlessly, under less-than-perfect conditions, and I am entirely satisfied with it in all respects. I would recommend it to my dearest friend. In fact, I may buy her (SWMBO) an AFTEC extractor for her very own, if/when the stock STI extractor (which is, after all, a point-failure part) gives out on her. However, she has only been using that extractor for 4 or 5 years, so we haven't had to replace it yet.

One interesting aspect of the AFTEC extractor: you can buy it for either the .38 Super (as I did) or for the .38 Super Comp cartridge. The difference in the cartridges is that the Super is a 'rimless' case, and the Super Comp is a 'rimmed' case. This is a matter of a few thousandths of an inch in rim diameter.

Rumors seem to abound in reference to the .38 Super/Comp designs of this extractor; I have heard several of them, and the most prevelant may be that the extractor designs are identical. If you are using Super cases, you only install one of the springs; if you are using Super Comp cases, you install both of them.

I'm using the 'rimless' Super case, and I installed both springs. So far, this has not caused a problem. Extraction of the rimless case has been reliable and consistant, although I note that extraction of the cases has been more powerful. By this, I mean that the cases are extracted so emphatically that they land farther from my shooting position than they did when using the stock non-AFTEC extractor. (This is, of course, merely anecdotal evidence.)

This weekend, I intend to go to the range and run some Super Comp brass through my AFTEC-equuiped STI.

I'll let you know in a day or two if I experience any problems.

(Sure hope Chuck Bradley hurries up with my back-order of a backup ejector; I have a Points Match coming up!)

UPDATE: 22-MAY-2005


I said I was going to do it, and I done it, and here's what happened.

Saturday SWMBO and I went to the range for a bit of practicing. I took along a hodge-podge of ammunition, including ammunition .38 Super, .38 Super Comp, and .38 Super AP. (I haven't yet found an Internet website which defines the manufacturer of brass headstamped "AP"; if I do, I'll say so here. In the meantime, accept that it's .38 super 'rimless' ammunition which isn't headstamped "COMP".) *

Anyway, I shot a variety of both rimmed and rimless ammunition through an STI racegun with the AFTEC extractor installed. It didn't seem to care what the rim diameter was, it worked with 100% extractor reliability all the time, every time.

This is much superior to my experience with other types of extractor. After about 100 rounds of mixed ammunition, I experienced no problems with reliable extraction of expended brass.

Today, I went to the range again to practice a specific stage. At one time, I shot about 60 rounds from a 4' x 4' shooting box. When I was done, I picked up my brass. I found 56 of the 60 pieces of brass within a 2' circle, about 5' from the shooting position. The other 4 rounds were found within a few feet of that circle; apparently, they hit a rock (the shooting bay was surfaced with large gravel) just right to cause them to bounce farther away.

I continue to be impressed by this extractor. In the past, when I found .38 Super Comp brass in my rangebag, I gave it away to friends who were shooting that cartridge. Often, I didn't find it until after I had reloaded it. Now I can keep it, and use it indiscriminantly. This greatly increases my options to use ALL of the range brass which is returned to me. I may not be able to use enough salvaged range brass to recover the cost of the extractor, but it certainly helps by reducing the amount of money I spend buying new brass. (I just bought 2,000 rounds of new Winchester .38 super brass, to use during the 2005 competitive season. This cost me $205, including shipping costs. The cost of brass is not an unimportant consideration.)

* UPDATE: May 31, 2005

Friend "SAM38" sent me the following information about the .38 Super AP headstamped brass:
The AP stands for Armscor Precision. You are correct in saying that it
is a flavor of .38 Super rimless. It is made in the Philippines and
is a lot cheaper than other rimless brands
Thank you, Sam, for relieving my ignorance.

Note that I have also received other information to the effect that Armscor makes both rimless and 'semi-rimless' brass in that caliber, but that you can't necessarily tell the difference from the headstamp. I don't know if that helps. I don't even know what "semi-rimless" means!
jB)

UPDATE: December 11, 2005
I continue to get a lot of 'hits' from folks who reach this website because they have searched the Internet for the keywords "Aftec Extractor".

If you are her because of such a search, and you have read down to this part of the article, I would appreciate your feedback. Did this article answer some or any of your questions? What were the questions, and what questions were not answered.
You can respond either in a COMMENT to this article, or you can write to me directly (see the implied email address at the bottom of this page)

Jerry the Geek, who LOVES his Aftec Extractor.

Thursday, May 19, 2005

YOB Meat II: "Why can't we be more like the Brits?"

Oh dear! I seem to have touched upon a sensative subject for the Brits!
It seems that YOBs are a serious crime-prevention problem, so they have devised a special punishment for them: The "ASBO". This is an "Anti Social Behavior Order", which might be called a "Restraining Order" in the USA.

Asbowatch VI: In the summertime:


One shopping mall has determined that their greatest anti-social problem is YOBS, who typically wear hooded sweatshirts or billed caps. So they have established a policy to forbid entry to people who are wearing these EEEVIL Clothing Accessories. ("Guns don't kill people; caps kill people. Oops! Wait a minute ... guns kill people too!")

If you show up at this mall wearing a cap, you will be subject to ... an ASBO!

Unfortunately, the YOBs laugh at this.

However, elderly people receive ASBOs also, for almost any reason (including feeding the pigeons ... I swear I am not making this up!) While the ASBO may not deter YOBS, it has the effect of restricting anti-social behavior among the elderly of England. Other anti-social behaviors cited in the article include sunbathing in a thong bikini (if you're a 60 year old male) and throwing rubarb at your sibling.

("Hat" tip to Kevin Baker of The Smallest Minority)

YOBs are so common in England, they even have their own comic strip:


It's a little bit of "Sound of Music", British style: "How do you solve a problem like Maria", but without the music and with more Nazi's:

Home Office minister launches war on 'culture of disrespect'

Teenage yobs are to be forced to wear US-style uniforms as they carry out community service punishments under plans for a new high-visibility crackdown on public disorder.

The move, echoing American chain gangs whose members wear orange jackets to shame them publicly, will be highly controversial and could risk reprisals.

But Home Office minister Hazel Blears argues justice must be seen to be done in the battle against what the government calls a 'culture of disrespect' - ranging from swearing, spitting and neglectful parenting to petty crime and violence.

In her first interview as the new minister for antisocial behaviour, Blears also suggested parents should enforce sensible bedtimes for children and restore 'structure' to family life, such as eating meals together. They should also be alert to what children wear following debate over teenagers wearing 'hoodies' to avoid CCTV identification.

Minister for Antisocial Behavior? My, the brits are really getting tough on crime, aren't they?

But some members of government don't expect these extraordinary measures to have much effect on the "YOB Problem":

... (Conservative Party "Shadow Home Secretary") Mr Davis said: "Labour have been in power for eight years and what have they done? They have permitted 24 hour drinking, let over one hundred thousand prisoners out of jail early, whilst at the same time making the life of a police constable on the beat more and more difficult."

He told conservatives.com: "An idea like this may well make a minor contribution to public confidence, but it will not make up for eight years of neglect of law and order."
Did I say something about "Music" and "Yobs"?

The Beautiful South serenades the English in all their shabby splendor; Black Box Recorder finds the sad side of sadism

It's a concept which clearly applies:



But wait! The government is going to save you!


(the link may not work ... the article is a week old, and no longer available except through a search)

Promoting respect towards others and clamping down on yobbish behaviour will be the key theme of a third term Labour government, Tony Blair said today.

The prime minister said it had been made clear to him during the campaign that people had real concerns about behaviour on the streets and in classrooms.



Promising a "bold programme" for the new parliament, Mr Blair said people were "fed up with street corner thugs" and respect for others would be a central plank of this parliament.

He said there were "root causes" of yobbish behaviour and binge drinking - including poor parenting - and parents should back teachers, not children, if they were reprimanded at school.

Mr Blair said that Labour would "sit down with head teachers" to make sure they had all the powers they needed in the classroom to deal with problem children.

Yeah, right.

He also lent his support to Bluewater shopping centre's decision to ban individuals who wear clothing that deliberately obscures their face, such as a hooded top and a baseball cap, saying: "I actually agree with it".


I actually am impressed. Okay, so perhaps not 'actually'.

One of the key things was to make "people feel safe and in control" and ensure a "modern society free from prejudice but not free from rules, he added.

It was important that "decent law abiding people aren't put in fear and frightened of going down to the shop", he said.
That sounds good. What are you 'actually' going to do about it?

Mr Blair was scathing of the European parliament's decision yesterday to vote for the removal of the 48-hour working week opt out saying that Europe "simply cannot afford to give up our flexibility" in the global economic market.

He had "no intention whatsoever" of abandoning the opt-out, adding that he believed the UK had a blocking minority on the council of ministers.
Woops?
Wait a minute here, Tony. You've already pledged to give more authority to the teachers, but you didn't say anything about giving more power to the parents to bring their yobbish kids under control. Now you're arguing to defend the 48-hour working week?

Has it occurred to you that the people who have to work 48-weeks are the ones who aren't at home six days out of every week are the parents who can't control their kids?

Maybe you should rethink your position. What's more important? Six-day workweeks, or getting your Yobs under control?

Never mind, I think we get the idea.

Wednesday, May 18, 2005

Yob Meat

I have limited myself to no more than one Geek BlogMeat post per month, because I thought it was a cop-out; blogging without purpose, as it were, and everybody does it when they feel guilty about not blogging and need an material to blog about even if they have nothing original to say.

But I really LOVE posting blogmeat, because you find so many really INTERESTING things on the Net. It's difficult to resist the temptation to share.

I have decided that if I don't call it "BlogMeat", I can post it anyway. The alternatives are to write more terribly revealing personal diary stuff (done that), write more about RKBA issues (I wrote an entire RKBA article last week about the REASON article on Gun Control, but it's way too long!) , blog another IPSC match (did that 2 days ago), not write about ANYTHING, or do ... this.

Scotsman.com News - UK - Teacher who fired airgun to ward off gang of yobs loses her job

I don't know what "Yobs" are, but I presume that they are goons, Juvenile Delinquents (we use to call them JDs), gangsters, or street predators ... based on the context in which the term is used in the cited article.

Here's a definition from my online dictionary:

yob (yŏb) pronunciation
n. Chiefly British Slang.

A rowdy, aggressive, or violent young man.

[Alteration of BOY (spelled backward).]



Basically, a teacher in Urmston, Manchester (apparently, in Northern England) felt threatened by a group of 'youngsters' who were hanging around outside her home, and fired an 'air pistol' into the ground to drive them off.

She was arrested, imprisoned, and later fired.

Why?

Here's a cut from the article, and if you don't understand the logic ... neither do I:

Linda Walker, 48, a teacher with 25 years’ service, was dismissed from her £30,000-a-year job after a five-hour disciplinary hearing with senior education officials.

The mother of two, who has received widespread support for her stance against vandals, emerged from the meeting with her career in tatters but vowed to fight her dismissal with an appeal.

Walker, who taught children with behavioural problems at New Park High School in Eccles, Salford, was jailed in March for firing an air pistol at the pavement during a stand-off with youngsters outside her house in Urmston, Manchester. She had been suspended from teaching since August last year.

Walker attended yesterday’s hearing, which was held in private, with officials from Salford’s education department, accompanied by Cliff Anderson, a regional co-ordinator for her union, the NASUWT.

After the hearing, Mr Anderson said: "It is with regret that we announce Mrs Walker has been dismissed from her post.

"With the support of the NASUWT, she intends to appeal. In the interests of ensuring that appeal is not prejudiced, Mrs Walker and the NASUWT will not be making any further comment at this stage."

It is understood the council argued that by having a criminal conviction, Walker had de facto committed gross misconduct and was unfit to be a teacher.

You gotta ask yourself: do you feel lucky?

If you do, and you're in the UK ... think again. There is NO excuse for refusing to be a victim and, after the government is through with you, your employer takes another thousand cuts.

Think your Union can help?
Think again.
They take your union dues, and when you really need them, they leave you swinging in the wind.

Makes you wonder, though. If she was a teacher for 25 of her 48 years, and the 'council' thought you were a fit teacher, what does this little lesson in respect for the sanctity of her home make her an 'unfit' teacher?

Argh!




Remember MAD Magazine? Are you willing to admit that you use to hang around the Safeway store every month, waiting for the next issue to come out?

Remember "Spy VS Spy"? They've still got it, even though the guy who use to write it died last year, in a Game. According to this website, they are still "written and illustrated by The Usual Gang of Idiots".



What's not to like about this?


Fonda Film Banned from Kentucky Theaters

Maybe ... this?




Buy This!



Note to self: Do NOT try to carjack an Oakland Cop!


And finally, just so you don't think I think that America is any better about a woman trying to defend herself with a gun, this from Richmond, Virginia:

Woman gets prison term in fatal shooting

Floyd Jamal Whitaker Jr.'s departure on Sept. 29 from the home he had shared with Carolyn Taylor did not go smoothly.

He had made several trips to his car with boxes of belongings from the house in the 1300 block of Enfield Avenue.

But Taylor, 33, told police that he had choked her during one of his trips back to the dwelling, and she had locked the door behind him and put a .22-caliber pistol in her pocket.

When Whitaker, 28, kicked in the door and choked her again, she fired a shot downward to get him away from her, she said. The bullet lodged in Whitaker's pelvis, and he bled to death from what appeared at first to be a superficial wound.

Taylor pleaded guilty in January to involuntary manslaughter, and Richmond Circuit Judge Richard D. Taylor sentenced her yesterday to serve three years and four months in prison.

Before she was sentenced, Carolyn Taylor apologized to Whitaker's family and added, "I never meant for him to die. . . . The gun that I had took his life, but I feel that it might have saved my life."

Whitaker's parents testified that his departure from the home was part of an effort to get his life on track. "It's like a part of me left," Lloyd Whitaker Sr. told the judge. "He should have been allowed to leave as he was preparing to do and we wouldn't be here."

Deputy Commonwealth's Attorney Diane Abato told the judge that Taylor could have left the apartment or called police to keep the confrontation from escalating.

"But as so often happens in this city, people arm themselves and think that solves the problem," she said.

(Emphasis added)

This is probably going to sound ignorant to some of you, but I was brought up to believe that choking a person is a good indication that you intend to kill them. Kicking down a locked door is an indicator of intended violence. And trying to choke a person twice goes beyond 'being momentarily carried away with the emotion of the moment.'

If I was Carolyn Taylor, I would think my options were few, and the best one was 'one of us is going to die, and it ain't gonna be me'. I suppose it was 'nice' that she didn't 'intend' to kill Ol' Pretty boy, but you have to admit ... she didn't have to worry about him choking him to death any more, and whatever the final result you have to remember the old adage:


"It is better to be tried by twelve than buried by six"


Hmmm ... let me think ....

Blooey!

Seems to me, arming herself DID solve the problem.

What do YOU think?


Monday, May 16, 2005

Tales of The Dark Side: Grumpy Old Men

My Father had a 'shooting buddy' named Charley Bowles.

(I can use his name here, because he's dead. His wife, the charming Lillian who I had a sophomoric crush on during high school, is dead. His son, much older than me and who I never met but always considered a wimp because his wimpy photograph which was prominently displayed in the Bowles home looked like the greasy slick-black-hair photo of a wimp ... he's dead too. So is my father, but that's another story and I don't want to talk about it because I miss him every damned day. Anyway, nobody cares any more and if the truth be told between the Marlboros and the Jamisons and the late-nites typing on a computer, I live an unhealthy lifestyle so I probably won't be around long enough to worry about any suits who want to sue me.)

Where was I?

Oh, right. I was being morbid.

Charley was not an easy guy to be around. Long-story-short, he was the most amazingly negative person with whom it was ever my displeasure to have to share the front seat of a '49 Chevy pickup at 5am of a Saturday morning on the way to the hunting grounds. And he had early morning gas, probably due to his unhealthy diet, but this is a subject about which I have lately learned to be MUCH more tolerant of so I don't hold that against him, as much as I would like to.

If we had been Neanderthals, and didn't have Chevy pickups yet, and I had been bigger and stronger and as agressive in spirit as I was in my mind, I might have done the world a favor and brained ol' Charley with a rock I had picked up as we were crossing the veldt on the way to the hunting ground some dark and dreary morning. Guess I was just born too late.

But since I was born in the Dawn of Technology, the story turns out a whole lot different. Charley lived long enough to get too old to hunt, took up golf, lost most of his vision when he took a golf-ball in the right eye when some golf-idiot was too lazy to yell FORE! or Charley was too deaf to hear it, and he died ten years later in his sleep.

Some stories just refuse to offer a happy ending.

So let's ignore the ending, and strike right into the middle of the story. That's the only part I really care about anyway, 'cause I don't think about Charley more than twice a year, and even then I either spit on his memory or give thanks to God for him

I gotta tell you, that last one really hurts.

Charley was the original Grumpy Old Man.

You think I am prejudiced? Get this: Charley was the math teacher at Helen McCune Junior High School in Pendleton, Oregon. He was my 7th grade math teacher, and he was famous as The Punisher. He had this flat-board paddle that he kept on the floor beneath his desk, and if you acted up in his class -- he would grab his paddle in his right hand and your right ear in his left hand (it's an anatomical thing) and march you into the hall and POW! POW! POW! lay right into you. None of this "we're going to talk to the Principal" stuff. No privacy. He loved to give it to you just outside the door to the classroom, so all of your pals could hear you squeal like a pig.

Yeah, he nailed me one lazy late-spring day. I don't remember why he paddled me; I was probably smarting off in class but it doesn't matter. My butt still stings. It was a "bum rap" by any interpretation of the term.

He was so good at beating up spanking little kids juvenile delinquents, the principal unofficially appointed him Unofficial Child Abuser Disciplinarian of Helen McCune Junior High School, and sent all of the miscreants up to his classroom on the second floor when they needed a good spanking for the good of their immortal souls. I can't tell you how many times he was interrrupted in class to go outside and whallop some 80-pound weakling. But I can tell you that he always had a look of satisfaction on his face when he came back into the class as the whimpering victim retreated painfully down the hall.

He took The Paddle down to the woodworking classroom in the school basement and drilled holes in it. Thankfully, I was into the 8th grade by then and not immediately available for his 'test drives'. I was in the First Year Algebra Class of Mister Requa, who only threw books at kids who seemed inattentive in class. Kewl, I could learn to dodge algebra textbooks. Mr. Requa was a wimp compared to Mister Charley Bowles.

About the time I as in about the 9th or 10th grade, I was really getting into hunting. I had gone on my first deer hunt when I was 13, and was three-for-three on Western Blacktail Deer. I hadn't been exposed *(yet)* to the exquisite agony of hunting Elk in the snow with a party of 50-year-0ld drunks who partied all night and farted in the trailer, so I still thought hunting was a great way to spend a day. Me, the rifle, the mountain tops, the dawn patrol, the wily deer .... life was SWEET!

The rest of the year, we hunted ... jack rabbits.

Jack rabbits made deer look like easy prey, because when Deer run they only bounced every three or four paces and they didn't bounce that high (unless a barbed-wire fence was in their way.) Jack Rabbits bounce whenever they feel like it, and they feel like it often. Nailing a running slash bouncing slash totally dash unpredictable jack rabbit was the greatest sport in the world, the best possible training for hunting. If you could hit a running jack one time out of three, you were God with a thirty ought six!

Deer were flighty. Jacks were tough. We didn't hunt Jacks with a .22, because they could be two counties over before they realized they were dead. You had to hit them with a center-fire cartridge, splay their insides all over every sagebrush in the quarter-Section, and still they would be squealing pitiously when you walked up to them with their entire midsection missing and you wondered how they could still be alive.

Some people chose to stomp not-yet-dead Jack's head with their boot heel to finish them off. Me, I kicked 'em in the head. I'm not entirely sure yet whether that was more effective in 'putting them out of their misery', but they ended up behind the sagebrush and stopped that annoying whimpering squeal they made when they were hurt real bad.

It reminded me too much of the hallway outside Mister Bowles's seventh grade mathematics room at Helen McCune Junior High School. I didn't like that. Didn't like the way it made me feel.

It made me feel bad.

It took me several years to realize that this means I wasn't Mister Bowles, Junior.

One brisk winter morning, when I was 15 or 16, Pop (I always called my father "Pop", 'cause I liked him) and I were hunting Jack in the desert/sagebrush country near Umatilla, Oregon, on the breaks of the Columbia river. There was a bite to the air, scattered unmelted snowdrifts on the ground, the sagebrush looked sparkley frozen where Jack Frost had applied his second coat of varnish, there were icicles dripping from the rusted barbs of the wire fences separating BLM grazing grounds, and Jack was feelin' lazy. Jack wasn't running today. He was moping in his warren with his pregnant lady, getting lucky (Lady Jacquiline was alway pregnant, had just birthed a litter or was about to birth a litter ... much like the girls in Pendleton High School, but do you think I ever got lucky?), but that didn't slow down her running/bouncing gait if she was out & about and who could tell the master from the missus when they were cruising the foxweed patches?)

The third party of our little impromptu hunt was Mister Bowles (I always called him "Mister Bowles, instead of "Charley" like Pop did, because I didn't like him. I mean I didn't like Mister Bowles, not that I didn't like Pop.)

We had gone on a sweep around 11 o'clock, three abreast with Pop in the middle. I don't know why Pop always put himself in the middle between me and Mister Bowles, who I still sub-vocally referred to as "Mister Bowels" as all the rest of the kids did who had either experienced or witnessed his 'special attention'. But we had made 3 or 4 cloverleaf hunts, with little success, and met back by the bitchin' 49 Chevy Pickup that Pop used for a hunting truck, and talked it over whether to make another sweep or give it up for the day.

It was cold -- bitter cold -- and I was all about hot chocolate and giving Jack a little time to settle down before we went out to hunt some more.

The grown-ups had enjoyed the day, weren't disappointed by the lack of rabbits, but were tired and cold, and (probably with the wisdom of experience) would just as soon have called it a day. Lucky me, they went along with the Hot-Drink Party Ticket and acceded to an early lunch. We could decide later whether to hunt some more, or to pack it in. These essential manly decisions were always best decided with coffee or chocolate steaming up their bifocals, and so they yielded to my adolescent agenda.

Get the picture in your head.

We're standing around, loaded rifles cradled in the crooks of our arms, ten feet from the truck. We decide to take a break rather than just bag it, so we haven't unloaded yet (as we usually do just before we cross the last fence before the truck.)

As I'm starting to fiddle with the bolt of my .30-06 that Pop made me from a sporterized 1903-A3 springfield, Mister Bowles pontificates:

Boy, point that gun another direction. You've got it pointed right at your father's leg.
Painfully pulling my head out of my ass, I look around and realize ... the sumbitch is right. It pains me to admit it, but he's right.

Swinging the rifle from the left ( where it was pointing at Pop's leg) to the right (cheerfully ACROSS Mister Bowles' leg .. the sumbitch), I achieve a pointing direction which is so safe, it ought to even satisfy the anal retentive (why did nobody every teach me that phrase when Mister Bowles was alive? It applies so perfectly to the sumbitch!) I tap the bolt to unload the chambered cartridge.

If you know the 1903-A3, you can see what happens next.

Realizing that it's nearly impossible to raise the bold on an 'A3 with the safety on, I flip the safety from SAFE to OFF.

The rifle goes BA-LOOOWEY!

Birds take wing in the bush.
My face is white.
Pop's face is white.
Mister Bowles' face is red.

Nobody speaks for the longest ten seconds in the history of human civilization. I wait for Mister Bowles to say ... "Well!"

Or "I told you so!"

Or even "If you hadn't moved your muzzle, you would have blown your father's laig clean off, you miserable little termite!"

I would have welcomed any of these punctuations, but he didn't say ANYTHING.

Not then.
Not later.
Not ever.

I waited for 20 years, until Mister Bowles dies, for him to say "I told you so!"
I waited another 15 years, until Pop dies, for him to say ... well, almost anything. Except for the one thing Pop said to end that eternal ten seconds.

"Well, it could have happened to anyone."

That's all he said. That's all anyone said. Ever.

My God, I didn't want to be forgiven. I didn't want Mister Bowles to be right, but he was. I had pictures in my mind of blowing Pop's leg off, and him dying before we could get him to somebody who could help because I SURE didn't know what to do to keep him from bleeding out in the sand and the foxgrass in the middle of that lonely, rusty bobwire-rimmed sagebrush patch. Short of actually having shot somebody, being forgiven so EASILY was the only thing I could think of that would be worse than that Mister Bowles was right, and I was wrong.

The grumpy old man I loathed had saved the life of the man I loved, and only incidently saved me from a life of self loathing.

...

Now I am a grumpy old man.

I look around me, and I see things. I see them so clearly, I wonder that those around me don't recoil in repugnance at the wrongs they see. I wonder how I can see things so clearly, when I would not have noticed the 'wrong-ness' only a few years before. Maybe I've become more observant. Maybe I've become less tolerant.

I am a grumpy old man, and while I know that I may sometimes infuriate those who fall under my baleful eye, I can't avoid the calling.

Grumpy old men.

They may not know the right thing to do.

They probably know all too well what is the WRONG thing to do.

I'm not really old. I couldn't possibly be a Grumpy Old Man already.
Could I?


God forgive us.

Sunday, May 15, 2005

IPSC in Oregon: Albany in May

The Lonely Silver Rain is passing, and here in Oregon we are now looking forward to The Dreadful Lemon Sky.

Or, in less colorful and less 'Travis McGee' terms: Autumn, Winter and Spring (all of which are lonely and rainy) are passing. We now face the prospect of dry, hot days which bring dehydration and sunburn -- as difficult as it may be to imagine, for those of us who are familiar with the rainy climate in Oregon. Will Geer said, in "Jeremiah Johnson":
March is a wet and muddy month. Some folks like it. Farmers, mostly.
IPSC shooters don't have much truck with March. Also, November, December, January and February. April Showers are oppressive in Oregon, and even May and June can bring surprisingly fierce downpours in a minute-by-minute changing environment. There's a saying here: "If you don't like the weather ... wait five minutes".

However, Saturday (May 14, 2005) fooled the weathermen (no great challenge to the weather; magnificent challenge to the weathermen) and instead of the predicted 'occasional showers' we saw the sun!

My ex-best-friend, who married my ex-wife, claimed "I once spent an entire summer in Oregon. It was one of the most pleasant weeks in my life." Well, he's from California; he's inclined to treat an actual CLIMATE with disdain. I feel the same way about San Francisco.

Still, we had a scheduled match and we came dressed for cold and rain. What we got was sun and heat, albeit high humidity. Reminded me in some ways of Alabama in the summer, except the air didn't quite taste like wet cotton, the soil wasn't red clay, and there was so much GREEN in every background that it fair took your breath away.

In May, the Irish envy us our Emerald Valley.

And they can't have all the shooting of pistols that we do.

The Albany Rifle & Pistol Club has one of the finest IPSC ranges in the world, and it was revealed to us as the gossamer background to a 10-stage, 250+ round match which challenged us to shoot & scoot at every opportunity ... and there were many opportunities in the Mac McCarter-designed match for the would-be Hoser in each of us.

One representative stage was the "Zig Zag". Run a PacMan-looking course from one close up and personal 6-round array to the next, and finish up on the tough but delightful Texas Star target.

Here's what it looks like at the start:

Al @ STAND BY Posted by Hello


I took a lot of pictures on this stage, and I hope they don't load too slowly for those of us who are viewing through the narrow bottleneck of a modem. (Click on the pictures to see them in large format.) This picture shows the lush green background which is typical of ALL of the stages at ARPC, and also reveals why the stage is named "Zig Zag".

Here's what it looks like at the first turn:

Al running the Zig Zag Posted by Hello



The competitor (Al, who REALLY doesn't like a full-face photo but consented to being photographed, as have all those who are depicted here) has engaged three IPSC targets behind hard-cover and is charging hard for the next shooting position.

Big Dog can MOVE! Posted by Hello


Changing from Al to "Big Dog", we see him cross-stepping as he engages the 3rd and final target on the second array. He's leaning into the turn, but stupidly I stopped the motor-driven camera after 3 exposures ... the last exposure would have shown him moving toward the third array but picking up the last shot one-handed as he pushed off from his strong foot. Another great moment in IPSC Action pictures lost because the photographer failed to sense the balance between position and momentum.

The "Groin-Pull Run" Posted by Hello


Moving from the 2nd to the 3rd array, we see yet another competitor in action. Bob is concerned with the possibility that one of his spare magazines might be dislodged by the bouncing action of a full-speed run, so he's protecting them with his weak hand. It looks awkward, perhaps, but Bob fulfilled the requirement that belt-carried equipment be retained during moments of strenuous, even violent activity.

Whatever works to get you through the stage. Note that no groin muscles were pulled during filming of this stage.

Mark on the Star Posted by Hello


Still another competitor, "Mark II", is engaging the Texas Star target. This consists of five 8" steel plates mounted in a pentagram arrangements, the arms of which pivot on a bearing race.

Here's a better picture of the Texas Star:
Star! Posted by Hello



Oops! Sorry, wrong sport (Tennis), wrong star (Anna Kournakova). Even wrong state (Russia). Certainly not a target. (Note: the link is heavy broadband)

But you get the idea ... a lot of points of interest going on, hard to keep track of what's moving where.

Let's try again:


target? Posted by Hello


Mmmmm ... no. Wrong state (China), the only stars are on his epaulets. And it's showing people where it should show targets. Well, that's something for China to work out.



I can't find a still photo of a Texas Star in my library. You'll have to be content with the photo without a large-format option, but it gives you a sense of the size of the target. (Note: the guy holding the target is not an optional accessory. He's Terry Ashton, the wicked man who invented the target.)

You can see a video of somebody shooting the Texas Star here. (Thanx to KR Training for the link; look under "2001" and "Shooting the Texas Star MPEG MOVIE". It takes about 3 minutes to download using a 56 baud modem.)

While we're waiting for this (and Anna's!) movie to download, let's go back to Albany and see the other photos I've provide here.

We left Mark blasting moving steel targets. That completes the series of photos for the Zig Zag stage, but here are a couple of other interesting photos, and a little bit more about another stage in the match.

Brassing Posted by Hello

One if the important functions of most IPSC matches is "Brassing". That is, recovering the expended brass which has been left on the ground after an IPSC competitor has completed a stage. Practical Pistol ("IPSC") competition can be an expensive hobby. Most participants seek to minimize the expense of competing by reloading their own ammunition. In fact, some 'wildcat' cartridges (and I specifically include the .38 Super, .38 Super Comp, and "Major Nine" ... 9x19 loaded to Major Power factor) are not commercially available, or at least not in a load suitable for making the compensator of an Open Gun work to maximum efficiency. Thus you will see, at most IPSC matches, grown men looking like chickens in a farmyard. The bobbing and pecking motions become stylized: anyone who is self-conscious about their dignity is advised to buy new brass after each match.

I know for a fact that some ladies (of course, I don't include SWMBO in this category) have on their computer a personal file folder consisting only of grown men stooping to retrieve brass. I believe these photographs are designated "Butt Shots". Probably, these ladies are amazed at the diligence by which men are willing to stoop to save a penny.




The RO:
"Mr. IPSC" Posted by Hello


No dissertation on IPSC competition is complete without including a paen to the Range Officer. These volunteers, stalwart and steely eyed, labor each weekend to ensure that IPSC competition is conducted under conditions of the maximum safety. While they are tasked at ensuring that the competitor has an enjoyable shoot-the-cardboard experience, they must also be knowledgeable about the rules of competition and be willing to sacrifice their meager rest-periods between shooters for the greater good of us all.

Such a Range Officer is "Norm". He has, as has every RO, spent at least one weekend for special training (provided by the NROI) to teach and then test, finally to certify, his ability to fairly and objectively evaluate the performance of every IPSC competitor. He accepts his responsibility to 'make the hard calls' .

I offer this photo only to exemplilfy the steely eyed stalwartness which goes into the making of an RO. I believe Troy M. was his NROI trainer: Acolades to Troy, and to all USPSA Instructors.


Steely eyedness is not the sole purvue of Range Officers. Many competitors are RO's, and they maintain their steely eyes even when they function as competitors rather than as Range Officers. One good example is "The Fish":

Fish @ LAMR Posted by Hello


Finally, we move completely off the ZIG ZAG stage to show yet another shooting challenge:

The "Tightrope" stage. (No, I have no idea where the stage name came from.)

Norm on "tightrope" Posted by Hello


It's difficult to see the plethora of a target-rich environment, but the concentration of the competitor (Norm) and the volunteerism-generated dedication of the Range Officer (Fish) are obvious.
Most of the stages in this Level I match were about 24 rounds. This one required 22 rounds, forcing competitors in every division to carefully hoard rounds and to know when and where to change magazines ... which may range from 7 to 27 rounds in their magazine. There was at least one user of a 6-round revolver, which was even more challenging.

IPSC competition offers unique challenges for every competitor. It can be expensive, although it is similarly possible to compete using minimally expensive equipment. Why do these men and women do it?

It's fun. You get to get outside and play silly games with your friends. You can make rude noises and noxious odors shooting pistols (note: do NOt brass behind The Geek or O'Shea, as they have historically exuded noxious odors not directly connected with their choice of gunpowder, when Brassing.)

If your name is Troy, or Will, you may have been a casual observer at this IPSC match. We were glad to see you, we're happy that you came by to watch us play, and we hope that you come back with a pistol and a couple of hundred rounds of ammunition to join us at play.

If you are neither of these people, perhaps you will be a guest at a future match and are equally receptive to our enthusiasm and our willingness to accept new members in USPSA competition.

When you've found a fun game to play, you want EVERYONE to join you here in the bright sunshine to enjoy shooting, to make new friends, and to enjoy their company. Being competitive is important in that it adds to the richness of the experience; we want to be compete because it adds richness to the experience. We are not competing primarily because we all think we can beat everyone who shows up at the match.

It's a GAME, Folks!

(UPDATE: May 16, 2005)
Corrected typos and awkward sentence structures. Added some links.