“This matter has been discussed. We have received information about it and have referred it to the FBI to consider whether or not it meets the criteria for which we could take action on,” said Attorney General Loretta Lynch, responding to a question from green activist Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI)at a Senate Judiciary Hearing.(Did anyone notice that "D" after Whitehouse's name?)
She's going to involve the FBI here?
“Under President Clinton, the Department of Justice brought and won a civil RICO action against the tobacco industry for its fraud. Under President Obama, the Department of Justice has done nothing so far about the climate denial scheme,”Scheme?
If you don't agree with the proposition of "climate change" being solely due to human activities (as opposed to the influence of solar flares), then you are involved in a "SCHEME"?
So, it's a RICO offense to not believe in the Party Line, now? I would suggest that this is reminiscent of Nazi philosophy, but I've been frightened away from that sort of extremism by the power of "Godwin's Law".
Scientists don’t use the term “consensus,” despite the regular use of the term by politicians who promote government-mandated action to stop alleged human-caused climate change. The scientific method has little space for opinion, and no room at all for the democratic process.Yet it’s that “consensus” that has U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch investigating whether the Justice Department can and should sue scientists and others who question the human-caused climate change assumptions.
Here's the bottom line: The Obama administration MIGHT prosecute citizens who believe in the First Amendment, the right to speak your mind regardless of the official "Party Line".
When the government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.Thomas Jefferson.