Saturday, November 10, 2018

Alleged intent of gun control vs. actual observable goals

They say that we peace loving Americans shouldn't have guns because of public safety ... but who will take guns away from those who threaten us with violence?

This is one of the best written, and most understandable articles on Gun Control I've read recently for a LONG time!  It starts out like this:
Alleged intent of gun control vs. actual observable goals -
 Pushers of gun control state the disarming the population is necessary for the safety of that same population. The punitive measures they are willing to employ to make that hypothetical safety happen look a lot like “he beats her because he loves her”. Or, as the old Soviet joke went: “We will fight for peace so vigorously that there’s (sic) won’t be anything left standing.” Gun control can only be enforced with other guns, so it’s all about concentrating military power in the hands of a small group that would keep others down forever. While some gun control supporters may be honestly deluded, many are lying from start to finish.

Read the whole thing.

If you think you need a gun to protect your self/family/home ... can you explain why?

If you don't accept the right to keep and bear arms as "legitimate", perhaps you can explain why not?


Anonymous said...

Donkey leadership is saying that now that they have gained control of the house of rep., they will be introducing all sorts of far reaching gun control legislation. Supposedly this will make us all safer.

Jerry The Geek said...

Yeah .. right. I can't wait. Welcome to "Veterans' Day, when the "Peace Party" will presumably interact with the Mustafas to negotiate a peaceful settlement.