There's a deep and surreptitious movement on the part of Liberal anti-gunners to encourage dramatic infringements on the Second Amendment rights of Americans for the purpose of ... er ... infringing on your Second Amendment Rights???
Let me see:
Outdoor writers' group responds to gun control op-ed from some senior members:
The letter by Ashe advanced an agenda to curb gun violence through regulations that included outlawing the sale of all semi-auto rifles and shotguns capable of holding more than 10 cartridges, a ban on gun sales to those under age 21, and a “no-fly/no-buy” law that would bar those on terror watch lists or with a mental illness recognized by the Social Security Administration from buying guns. Other suggested measures included a ban on bump stocks, mandatory and universal background checks, the institution of gun violence restraining orders and increased federal gun research. “(I)n comparison to the 17 people at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School who have been stripped of all of their rights, and of life and liberty, it is a small price to pay,” said Ashe in the piece, saying, “There are simple, responsible solutions. No one should use hunters and hunting as an excuse to avoid pursuing them.”
"No one should use hunters and hunting as an excuse to avoid pursuing them.”This goes beyond the usual "anti-gun violence" rhetoric.
It exceeds all previous proposed restrictions on the Second Amendment.
Yes, some of the proposals which have previously been proposed elsewhere, and some of the restrictions seem almost reasonable.
But the part about SSA defining "Mental Illness" has already been defined as excessive ... just because someone wants another party to help with Social Security form doesn't mean they are mentally deficient.
"Simple, responsible solutions"?
Neither Simple, nor Responsible. Only burdensome to honest, law-abiding citizens.
"A Small Price to Pay"?
I think not!
The reference to Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School is excessive, bordering on Facetious.
EVERYTHING they propose is overly simplistic and arbitrary, designed only to undermine the Second amendment rights of Americans.
We are not amused.
1 comment:
In the Santa Fe HS shooting, by all reports, the shooter used a shotgun, no mention of it being semi-automatic, or having an over 10 round capacity, and a revolver, which is not a semi-automatic and has an under 10 round capacity
Post a Comment