Some people will go to extravagant ends to justify their theories, even at the risk of allowing themselves to be identified as fools. You have to ask yourself, what does this have to do with "Gun Control"?
On the anniversary of the Columbine shooting, examining the science behind why better gun control really will stop school violence — Quartz:
In 1963, Britain experienced 5,714 suicides. Over the next several years, that number declined steadily and quickly; by 1975, the country had 3,693 suicides. This decline took place against a rise in suicides throughout the rest of Europe. Social scientists started looking for something to explain the drop. What they realized was that the decrease in suicide had coincided with the progressive transition in British households from carbon monoxide-producing coal gas to natural gas, beginning in 1958.
First, the title of the article suggests that the topic is "School Violence" .. but the dominant text seems to address British Suicides!
The rest of the article seems to be on track with the "British Suicide" theme, but it doesn't lead into the title topic: "Gun control ... will really stop school violence".
Here's the lame explanation proffered later in the screed:
Opponents of gun control often argue that if we take guns away, those intent on killing or committing crimes with them will simply “find another way.”
(I don't argue against that; it's Suicide 101.)Another Clarke and Mayhew study, for example, found that thefts of motorcycles dropped as much as 60% in Germany after a law was implemented requiring motorcyclists to wear helmets. Because these thefts tended to be crimes of opportunity rather than planned heists, potential thieves were dissuaded from stealing motorcycles due to the increased likelihood of getting caught if they were pulled over for not wearing a helmet.What the heck? We bounced from Suicide, to Gun Control, with a short stop-0ver at Columbine! And now we're talking about motorcycle Theft? And safety helmet laws?
Am I the only one who can't keep track of the theme of this screed?
Finally, the author decided that the cause-and-effect relationship was determined by ... what was it again?
.... the progressive transition in British households from carbon monoxide-producing coal gas to natural gas, beginning in 1958
Oh, yeah, right: carbon monoxide poisoning from Coal Gas.British humor: we "Amies" can't always tell whether they're "having us on" or ... what?
1 comment:
The new term for GW is climate restoration.
Post a Comment