There is a "class" of people who think that the Constitution of the United States should be "rewritten" to recognize the values which have (in their mind) become preponderate in our country.
The Second Amendment is at the top of their "hit list", because it subtly proposes that each American is responsible for his/her own safety and security.
Men are responsible for their own self defense, as well as for the defense of their family, their peer group, their clan ... everyone for whom men feel a social connection in which every member supports every other member.
In this situation, and in Modern America, men have accepted their responsibility by arming themselves and by practicing the skills which enable them to defend their. peer group.
As for the confiscation of firearms, men deem the ownership of firearms to be required in a Free state: if we cannot defend our Family,, we are freeloaders who contribute nothing to Society.
That's permissible, but it is not a "High Value" status in the clan: it's a "hanger-on" a person who is not competent, and is only accepted because his contribution adds to the social value, not the continuation, of the Clan.
Those who would deprive us of our right to self-defense are not NOT among our "support group",
They choose to arbitrarily determine what actions we might take in our priority to survive, and their priorities are political rather than practical.
They are typically not responsible for their own safety ... they hire guns, but do not carry them.
"Those poople" usually have not been "shot at". They are very comfortable in their cocoon of inexperience. They glory in their supposed value ("Hey, I'm a STAR!) and the expense of hiring guards in off-set by the publicity value.
You and I don't have any publicity value, and therefore we need to provide our own self-defence.
I've been "shot at:. I didn't enjoy the experience and I take responsibility for my own personal well-being. But I was in a war zone, and I ws drafted.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment