(November 06,2015)
On November 2 Obama-nominated U.S. District Judge Eleanor L. Ross gave one year probation to a woman who admitted buying a gun for her boyfriend, which he later used to shoot and kill Omaha Police Officer Kerrie Orozco.
One assumes that the charge was lying on the BATF form.
Why wasn't she charged with (a) being an accomplice to murder, or at least (b) negligent homicide by proxy. (Okay, I made that last one up.)
Compare this to the usual Liberal pap which insists that firearms manufacturers should be legally responsible for murders caused by the RETAIL purchasers of firearms the manufacturer sold to a retail dealer.
Honestly, the Gun Control arena is becoming so complicated it's sometimes difficult to tell the right from the left.
3 comments:
Could it be that the woman is one of "Obama's people"? Under the Obama DOJ and judicial there is a double standard in sentencing.
I think that is one of the most inane comments I have ever received here. You're a funny boy.
Waitaminit... I thought the sentence for lying on a 4473 was 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. You can be sure you or I would get pretty close to that.
How on this Green Earth did she swing 1 year of probation?
Post a Comment