The Last Bulwark?

ISIS Names U.S. States for Attacks | PJ Tatler:

 “Out of the 71 trained soldiers 23 have signed up for missions like Sunday, We are increasing in number bithnillah. Of the 15 states, 5 we will name… Virginia, Maryland, Illinois, California, and Michigan,” the posting continues. 

Interesting:   we have a lot of states with strong gun control laws, and those are are ares which are threatened?

I just watched a Fox News video where we (individual citizens) are encouraged to protect ourselves.


That seems entirely reasonable to me.  Unfortunately, people in some states ( Maryland, Illinois, California and Michigan including others such as New York and New Jersey smf D.C.) will have problems protecting themselves when they have no guns because their LEGAL access to personal firearms is highly restricted by state/district law.

Because ... NOT Second Amendment Friendly. (Note: attached image from 2013 regarding Concealed Carry laws; not all information may be accurate today.   That might change tomorrow if the Dems have their way.)

Let's look at these states:

• VIRGINIA: What they really mean is DC.  Strong resistance to apportioning Concealled Carry Licenses.  Nobody likes guns except for (a) gangbangers and (b) those who want to defend themselves against gangbangers.   
• MARYLAND: See Virginia.  Read: BALTIMORE.
• ILLINOIS: Stay out of Chicago, ISIS.   The only ones with guns there are the gangbangers, but they ALL have guns.  Chi-town is just pleased as punch when they only have 499 murders per year within the city limits.   Recommend you look at MORTON GROVE.
• CALIFORNIA: Making strong inroads toward restricting "authorized" ownership of many most all firearms, because SAFETY.  Wide open to illegals of all sorts; y'all stop by y'hear?
• MICHIGAN: Thoroughly democratic to the point where they're almost as opposed to anyone owning a firearm as they are opposed to electing a non-Democrat to any public office ... right down to the Commissioner of Police in any major city ... both of them.   Avoid DETROIT; Nobody there has a job or any money, but they all have guns and they have nothing to lose.

Still .... we know what Colorado citizens said when their Governor started demanding restrictive firearms laws:   Shall Not Comply.   This is a new trend, and the timing is right because if ISIS Assholes Warriors start invading any Shall Not Comply state, they may discover that the police are as reluctant to enforce gun-control laws as the citizens are reluctant to obey those laws.   Politicians be damned, this is a true American State and the 'whole' population will not be ruled by the namby pambies who occupy Denver like a plague of locusts.

American Democrats hav always been just a little bit ... iconoclastic.  They think that 'cherished beliefs and traditions' are based on "error, superstition, or lack of crativity".

Not at all.  We're still pioneers in America, and we won't be ruled by Geneva.

American Conservatives "cleave to their guns and their God" (the nicest thing that President Obama has ever said about Conservatives), and not are so much invested in "Hope and Change". 

(We've seen how well that has worked out.)

In a very quirky way, this latest threat from the Muslim Fanatics serves to validate the Second Amendment.

For decades, Conservatives have insisted that the Constitution defines and supports traditional values and beliefs, and have ignored Liberal extremists who contend that we must change our ways, because the 'old ways' are outdated (and therefore wrong!)

Maybe the Second Amendment is the first bulwark against not only an American leadership gone wrong, but also against foreign intervention.

You think?