Oh, go watch the six minute video. You'll be glad you did. (H/T to The G-Man)
Why "No Obamacare"?
Because of the problem of "The Tyranny of the Majority".
The concept of "The Tyranny of the Majority" states that when the majority rules, and the government must -- or chooses to -- dictate policy based on the dictates of the majority, then the people learn that they can get anything they want based solely on their desires .... not necessarily based on their needs or their inability to provide for themselves.
This was a cautionary of Alexis De Tocqueville in his book "Democracy in America":
"Tocqueville speculates on the future of democracy in the United States, discussing possible threats to democracy and possible dangers of democracy. These include his belief that democracy has a tendency to degenerate into "soft despotism" as well as the risk of developing a tyranny of the majority .... ".Another interpretation of the term "tyranny of the majority" is "Mob Rule".
The American Founding Fathers introduced the Republican, rather than the Democratic system of governmental philosophy (along with the attendant "Electoral College") specifically to avoid this "Mob Rule" aspect of a true democracy. True democracy works well for small groups; the Greeks found it worked well for city-states. But in a nation of over a third of a billion citizens, the temptation is strong for the sick, lame and lazy to prey upon the productive minority.
True, President Obama has not yet turned America into a Socialist state; he has not yet nationalized industry.
Well, there's General Motors, and "Organized Labor:, and savings & loans, and banks, and the entire "mortgage industry", and ... but that's all the fault of the Bush Bail-Out.
However, George W. Bush did not intentionally commit the entire National Debt for the next ten generations for the purpose "redistributing the Wealth of the Nation".
This is the avowed goal of our current president.