Thursday, June 13, 2013

Roll Call Vote: UN Treaty on Small Arms Limitations

U.S. Senate: Legislation & Records Home > Votes > Roll Call Vote:

U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 113th Congress - 1st Session as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate Vote Summary Question:
On the Amendment (Inhofe Amdt. No. 139 )
Vote Number: 91 Vote Date: March 23, 2013, 04:30 AM
Required For Majority: 1/2 Vote Result:
Amendment Agreed to Amendment Number: S.Amdt. 139 to S.Con.Res. 8 (No short title on file)

Statement of Purpose: To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.

Vote Counts: YEAs 53 NAYs 46 Not Voting 1
____________________________________________________
The motion was defeated: 46 senators voted to undermine the Second Amendment.   Curiously, the single non-voting vote was Senator Lautenberg (D-NJ).


Here's the list of (46) senators who voted AGAINST supporting the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (from this view of the vote):

Baldwin (D-WI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bennet (D-CO)
Blumenthal (D-CT)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Coons (D-DE)
Cowan (D-MA)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Franken (D-MN)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Harkin (D-IA)
Hirono (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kaine (D-VA)
King (I-ME)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murphy (D-CT)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schatz (D-HI)
Schumer (D-NY)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Udall (D-CO)
Udall (D-NM)
Warner (D-VA)
Warren (D-MA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)


Please note that these are ALL Democratic senators, with the exception of the two Independent senators.

On the other hand, these are the 53 (majority) senators to voted FOR the Second Amendment:

Alexander (R-TN)
Ayotte (R-NH)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Begich (D-AK)
Blunt (R-MO)
Boozman (R-AR)
Burr (R-NC)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coats (R-IN)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
Cruz (R-TX)
Donnelly (D-IN)
Enzi (R-WY)
Fischer (R-NE)
Flake (R-AZ)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Hagan (D-NC)
Hatch (R-UT)
Heinrich (D-NM)
Heitkamp (D-ND)
Heller (R-NV)
Hoeven (R-ND)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johanns (R-NE)
Johnson (R-WI)
Kirk (R-IL)
Lee (R-UT)
Manchin (D-WV)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Moran (R-KS)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Paul (R-KY)
Portman (R-OH)
Pryor (D-AR)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rubio (R-FL)
Scott (R-SC)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Tester (D-MT)
Thune (R-SD)
Toomey (R-PA)
Vitter (R-LA)
Wicker (R-MS)

Ignoring the fact that both of my Oregon (democratic) senators voted on the wrong side ... well, I never voted for THEM, so why should they vote for MY rights ... I don't see ANY Independent votes on the AYE side.

Which is to say, if you support the Constitution the Independents are not your friends.

It was almost a straight-up party vote, in that no Republicans voted against the Constitution.  Curiously, however, there were a few Democrats who also voted to support the Constitution.

This data is almost three months out of date. But this is the first time I have seen the actual detail results.

(NOTE: although I have recently castigate ex-Representative Ron Paul (R-Tx) for his ludicrous public statements,  I note that Rand Paul (Junior senator from Kentucky) voted FOR the Constitution.)

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

In the senate, the term independent is a misnomer. At least one of them, the Senator from Vermont, is an avowed socialist, and proudly boasts of it.