I think I've lost the Edge which allows me to be an entertaining Blogger.
It's not that there aren't outrageous events occurring around the world. It's just that I don't care enough about it to react.
Look at the list of things I could be writing about:
In a world obsessed about Global Warming, Britain faces temperatures as cold as the South Pole. But do I care? I do not. Let them eat cake. They're big in Copenhagen, let them go back to a coal economy and choke in the out-gasses of their effluvia. If they were serious about the Kyoto Treaty, they would do the world a favor and just freeze to death. It's all the same to me.
In Virginia, a man assaults his fiancee and whacks her sister with a Samurai sword. Ordinarily, I would consider this an argument for Samurai Control, but today ... who cares? Sure, it slices and it dices, but can it make Julienne Fries? No? Then who cares?
Twenty-seven years ago, someone murdered 7 people by substituting Cyanide for the contents of Tylenol Capsules in the store, and now he has been arrested. Has anyone heard about this? No? I thought not. But the guys who use guns as an instrument for murder of a lesser number of people populate the headlines of newspapers around the world. Is the Mainstream Medai biased toward using Gun Crime as a case for Gun Control? Yes. Do they ignore non-gun murders? Yes. Who cares? Certainly they don't, and Fox is about the only media who bothers to report the potential end-game for this particular Mass Murder. If the MSM doesn't care enough to report it, why should I care any more?
A Maine woman shoots her husband as he sleeps. Never mind that he has been abusing her (and their daughter) for years, it's still a "gun crime". But there may have been some justification, it may actually be an argument for firearms ownership, in that other than pouring gasoline over him while he sleeps is historically the next-best way to rid one-self of an abusive husband. But do we hear about this in most MSM venues? No. The Burning Bed gets a lot of publicity, but this does not. Who cares? Certainly not me. (PS: She was absolved of any criminal act and allowed to go free ... as if it matters, right?)
And that "Several States Ease Restrictions on Gun Laws" also goes generally unreported. Is this important? I guess not. And the reasons why these restrictions are 'eased' -- and more important, the fact that the results are that less crimes are committed in states with fewer restrictions to firearms ownership, doesn't seem to be publically accepted as significant must mean that most people just really do NOT care. So for once, I find myself with the (supposed) majority on this issue. Because you know what? I don't care.
What is important?
In England, it's important that "Tommy the Tank" books (a child's storybook about a steam engine named 'Tommy") is sexist, and "Demeaning to Women". But if we refer to an individual woman as being 'built like a tank', we're sexist and demeaning to women, to. You can't win, so why bother trying?
And in case those of us who call America 'home' are feeling just a little smug, because stuff like that just can't happen in American, please be advised that New York has declared war on "realistic-looking Toy Guns". But I don't live in New York, and I have no idea how big a problem this is, so while I may conceivably care ... I'm in no position to criticize them, either.
So "I Don't Care!"
I'm not saying that my Lese Majesty attitude is the right way to live, all I'm saying is that if we pay too much attention to the MSM while trying to determine what is societally and culturally important, we're bound to get it wrong every stinkin' time.
So why should we care?
Darned if I know.
No comments:
Post a Comment