Mine ... and yours, if you are a Second Amendment Advocate.
Obama: U.S. Gun Law 'Has Made...Homegrown Extremists' Strategy More Attractive to Them':
By Susan Jones | August 5, 2016 | 5:05 AM EDT
(CNSNews.com) - "In terms of the threat that ISIL poses to the homeland, I think it is serious," President Obama told a news conference on Thursday. "We take it seriously." The president pointed to a New York Times report on ISIS' radicalization efforts to suggest that U.S. gun laws may encourage lone-wolf attacks here.You can't blame him for the stunning turnaround by the group of desert hobos which he initially described as the "Junior Varsity". He figures the events have embarassed himself, so he's 'reconstructing the dialogue'.
He has found a way to use pirated dialogue to blame anyone but him:
"But the fact that we have what he referred to as 'open gun laws' meant that anybody, as long as they didn't have a criminal record that could bar them from purchase, could go in and buy weapons. That has made the sort of homegrown extremists' strategy more attractive to them. And those are the hardest to stop because by definition, if somebody doesn't have a record, if it's not triggering something, it means that anticipating their actions becomes that much more difficult.Translation: (and I'm extrapolating here; he didn't really say any of this, but this is the impression I got from the statement) ---
If those Crackers didn't cling so firmly to their guns and their God, we would by God put some teeth into Gun Control and nobody could own a gun unless we say they could!So it's not his fault (he is perfect) and it's not the fault of ISIS because they found a crack in our ass; it's the fault of American Gun Owners who insist that the Second Amendment is a Constitutional Right ... which is flawed logic.
If he had his way, nobody would own a gun unless he said we could ... and we would either be a policeman, or a soldier!
His recovery reminds me of one of my favorite comic strips, "Rick O'Shay". In one episode, Rick goes looking for a new hat because his old one is worn out. He buys a hat, looks at it and it just looks ... wrong. So he jumps on his new hat until it looks the way he thinks a hat SHOULD look!
I am probably lacking in the moral correctness which suggests that I should give up my individual constitutional rights for the good of the many, but I have always believed that the rights of the individual are more important than the rights of the group. People who are much smarter than I am refer to this as "Individual vs Collective Rights".
Being (as I am) a "Cracker", and a stubborn one at that, I'm probably not going to change my opinion just because My President thinks I should.
My President can change his hats as frequently as he talks to another diplomat, and beat it onto whatever shape best suits him.
For me, my Old Hat works just fine. I'm not an intellectual, and I didn't grow up in Chicago, so there is probably something that I don't understand about The New America.
The one thing that I do understand is, I have kind of got use to The Old America, and I've learned to love it.
I don't want some Obama-come-lately to be "re-imaging" my country. My "old hat" may be tawdry in the eyes of a Comsmopolitan, but it fits me just fine.
Oh, and if another "Reshaper Of America" should enter office next year?