Saturday, July 21, 2007

CCS Tournament - Day 1 (Major Match Blues)

We just shot the first day of the two-day Columbia Cascade Section (Oregon) Tournament. I feel like the old Henny Youngman joke: "I just flew in from Vegas, and Boy! My wings are tired!"

This is a 12-stage match, presented in 10 bays. Three stages are presented in one bay - they are quick, short stages (two 8-round, one 6-round) on which I presume each competitor shoots all 3 stages, back to back to back. Or side to side to side, as it were. I'll have pictures tomorrow. We -- the truncated (9-person) "Usual Suspects" squad -- didn't shoot that bay.

The arrangement was that we shoot 7 stages Saturday, then Sunday shoot the remaining 5 stages. Then there's a free BBQ. I assume that means we have to eat ribs. I hate ribs. I hope they have Kielbasa, but that's probably too much to ask. I'm not a big BBQ fan, which is surprising because I'm a carnivore. Nothing green, please. My friends and family have horrified me with tales of dying a nutrient starved early death for the past 60+ years. I'm still waiting.


We were the 5th squad, so we started out of Bay 5, which held a 32 round stage with two Texas Star targets. Then we went to the Bay 6 and shot another 32 round stage after waiting 20 minutes for the squad before us to clear the stage.

In fact, Bay 7, Bay 8, Bay 9 and Bay 10 also featured 32-round stages, at which we had to wait 20 minutes (more or less) for the previous squad to finish. They had 12 people, and they had 'issues'.

These are The Big Bays at Tri-County Gun Club. Most of them are 20-30 yards wide and 50 yards deep, and the match administration chose to fill most of them from berm to berm and from front to back of the bay. This made for a LOT of walking whether you're shooting, RO-ing, taping or setting steel. By 2pm we were on Bay 10 and my feet were absolutely killing me. I sat on my butt for most of the stage, but with only 9 people in the squad there aren't that many warm bodies to work the stage so I only got to sit down for 4 shooters, and I taped the 'close' targets for 3 of them.


It was an overcast, warm day which should have been perfect shooting weather. Unfortunately, it has rained the past 3 days in Oregon, not hard but daily, so while gravelled bays were not soggy the atmosphere was very humid. I had worn a light long-sleeve shirt under a golf shirt, but I went to my car and changed into a tee shirt for the rest of the match in an attempt to alleviate the effects of the muggy air. There were two 10-minute showers, not what Oregonians call "Rain" but enough that we were more comfortable putting on a light jacket to keep from getting too soaked. After the rain quit, the ground and the people steamed until the worst of the moisture in shirts and pants had evaporated. But you had to keep moving, because to stand still was to create your own personal climate which reminded me uncomfortably of my sojurn at Fort Benning in 1969. It wasn't quite like breathing through damp cotton, and certainly better than the burning summer sun and 90-plus degree temperature we usually expect this time of year, but it was enough for Fat Old Men like me to feel our age.

Our last stage of the day was a 16-round 'almost-hoser' stage stage, which completed my personal downfall. My gun didn't clear the USA holster ... first time in a long while I've had problems with the draw ... and I had a 2-second feeding jam that I still haven't figured out.

The earlier stages in the day were satisfactory for me. I was shooting B-class scores in B-class times, which wasn't enough to win anything but at least I could hold my head up. In the later stages, though, I seemed plagued with every kind of silly little problem I would never have expected. In one stage I blew past a long-distance target. In the Fixed Time stage, my last of four strings ended prematurely when my weak-hand string ended with a !Click! instead of a !Bang! I pulled the cartridge, and it had no primer. I assume it was old brass with an expanded primer pocket, and the primer just fell out of the case while I was shooting the stage.

It could have been much worse. It could have happened on the first round of the string, rather than the last.

We were the LAST squad off the range today. In a 250-round match, we had shot all six 32-round stages (with waits between stages), and a 16 round stage for nearly 200 rounds total. By my count, we will have about 53 rounds to shoot tomorrow, and then we get to wait for the BBQ to be set up. I'll have something to look forward to, while I'm waiting.

This monologue is pretty depressing, isn't it? Nobody likes to hear a cry-baby. But it does me good to get it out of my system, and if I can't tell you ... who can I tell?

GOOD Things!


Actually, so far I very much enjoyed the match despite my personal tribulations.


The 32-round stages were varied, and gave us the opportunity to play hard and long. The first two were pretty much hoser stages, if you ignore that one started out with a string of 8 poppers and two Texas Star arrays. Another was all paper, set up so you could run the whole vertical envelopment without stopping. Another had an inventive mixture of 50-yard and in-your-face paper targets. Still another had you backing up
for the first five paper targets, then running madly downrange to shoot mixed paper and steel on one side, then running to the other side to shoot a mirror-image misture, with a bobber in the center to keep you honest.


The Fixed Time stage had four strings shooting 2 rounds each at 3 targets: six rounds free-style at 50 yards; the same at 40 yards with a reload in the middle; six rounds strong hand at 30 yards, and six rounds 'support hand' at 20 rounds. Par time was 6 seconds. I finished the reload-string at 6.30 seconds, just 1/100 second under the overtime-shot cut-off. I was smug, and although it was pure luck it took the sting out of the disappointment of the primerless-cartridge at the end of the 4th string.

The stage we finished on (Stage 1, Bay 1 - "Vegas Windows") had you start from a box with a holstered, unloaded gun. Two paper targets visible from the box, one was mostly covered except for the B-zone by a penalty target. Through a port on the left were 2 paper, one Pepper Popper. Same through the port on the right, except there was one more paper target to make it a 16-round stage.

The good news is, I did everything right: instead of loading and engaging the obvious targets from the starting box, I use the move-to-the-left-port time to load, took the middle targets with only a moments hesitation for the B-zone target, and hosed the right port targets. But because of the poor draw, and the jam, I got a less than impressive time. The good news was, I provided sight-gag for my squad.

Here's the funny thing. I spend the month of June having gun problems which turned out to be my own fault because I didn't lubricate the pistol adequately, despite my proclaimed advocacy of "if a little oil is good, more is better". I finally got that worked out the last month of June.

Then for the first three weeks of July I didn't shoot a single round. Instead, I've been watching Multi-gun matches and writing about them and publishing photos and videos.

Now I finally get a chance to shoot a match, and the gun works (usually), and I'm so out of shape that I don't have the stamina to bear up under 7 stages in one day.

Ironic, isn't it?

The funniest thing is, I was cleaning and OILING THE BEJIMEZE out of the pistol in preparation for the match, and I had the barrel in the slide and the recoil-spring assembly installed before I realized I hadn't installed the firing pin and spring back into the slide.

Imagine if I had started my first 32-round stage, and realized on the first trigger-pull that I had no firing pin?

Now, THAT would have been funny.

__________________________


So that it will not appear that the "Usual Suspects" squad is infested with a Bad Attitude, I offer this vidoe of our last stage, "Vegas Windows".

If it is not obvious to the viewer, we're old and tired but still having a good time.

Thursday, July 19, 2007

Henning Wallgren Shoots Guns

I've never seen him shoot, but Henning is my New Hero.

I tripped over his internet website a few months ago, and linked to it on my sidebar.

Today I found his website for the 2007 Rocky Mountain 300 and fixated on the videos he presented.

(Check out the "Shoot-Off" videos.)

Then I looked at the videos on his 2007 Double Tap Championships.

This is a guy who knows how to follow the shooter closely when he's taking videos, and as a 'video blogger' I appreciate his ability to get 'in your face' (or 'in the back of your head') priorities.


I encourage you to go to the website(s) and look at the videos. Note that some of the videos of the Double Tap match don't download, which is a technical glitch and shouldn't reflect on the host ... but I wish he would clean it up. Also note that a stage which is said to feature Local Hero Yong Lee is either miss-named, or Yong Lee has scrawnied up a bit since I last saw him a couple of months ago. Okay, it's true what they say about the camera taking weight off you. And, he sure shoots like Yong Lee.

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Columbia Cascade Section Tournament

The CCS Section Match is scheduled for July 21-22, 2007.

Today is Wednesday, July 18, 2007. SWMBO is out of town this weekend, my gun ain't been running right (poor maintenance -- my bad), I'm low on ammunition/time/cash, and I HATE lost-brass matches which this promises to be.

I haven't shot an IPSC match in a month, even though I've been to two shooting matches where I did nothing but wander around and take pictures of people who WERE shooting.

Two days before the match, I decide it's worth it to drive the 60-miles each way, two days straight (total gas price: about $40), pay the $90 match fee, write off $50 worth of brass and catch the match.

I owe it to myself. Besides, it's either spend the weekend shooting or spend two days wearing my Regulation Blogger Pajamas and smoking too much while I bore all of you by writing too much.

A few minutes ago I sent an email with an application to CCS Treasurer John "Big Dawg" Weil, begging him to accept my promise of a check ($90, with the late fee) when I show up at the stats shack at the Tri County Gun Club on Saturday Morning ... I wonder if I can drive there from Corvallis before 8am without SWMBO to urge me to get out of the house on time? She's going to be out of town this weekend, and I'm at a total loss without her. On the bright side, if she's not going to be around, I can stop by her house and steal all the good stuff out of her shooting bag (lots of extra magazines) on my way out of town. Now, if she hasn't locked it all into her Gun Safe I might have enough mags to handle all the 32 round stages and the THREE low-round-count stages on Bay Four.

Actually, looking at the squad lists there are three short squads I might get hooked up with. I can shoot with Big Dawg, or I can shoot with Bruce Gary and a bunch of Local Heroes, or I can shoot with Higbie (who's always good for a laugh, as long as he doesn't get excited and have another freaking heart attack. You know the joke: "Shoot the stage, drag Higbie ...") He looked pretty good when he was RO-ing the R&R Racing Multigun Challenge match at ARPC last weekend, though, so maybe he's good for another match as a competitor.

Heck, maybe Bill Salberg will show up. He's a Spokane boy, and I haven't shot with him since we were together at the TCGC Club Match in June, where he did the "Rodeo Queen Wave" when he fell down on Stage 6. He looked funny, one hand in the gravel and the other hand waving his pistol in the air trying to get up. I could squad with him and maybe get some good video as he tries to swim through an ocean of little tiny rocks, if I'm not so distracted by the performance that I forget to point the camera at him ... as happened LAST time.

It'll be nice to actually SHOOT on a weekend. It has been raining in Oregon for the past couple of days, and the weatherman at weather.com forecasts showers and 70 degrees. Perfect Oregon shooting weather. Not too hot, the rain will keep the dust down and maybe it will discomfort somebody else more than it will me. Hmmmm ... I need to remember to wear my boots and bring a light rain jacket.

Oh wait. Everybody there will be from the Pacific NorthWest, they'll all be accustomed to shooting in the rain. No wonder the match has over 70 people signed up, which isn't bad for a Section match.

Never mind. At least I know how to spell everyone's name, I can actually SHOOT for a change, and maybe I'll even get some interesting pictures to spend next week editing and posting here, and on the video gallery.

And there's a stage with two Texas Star targets ... maybe even an Evil Oregon Star, who knows? Something to look forward to.

Watch this space.

Excuse me, I have to go load ammunition for the weekend.

{sigh} I've missed that.

R&R Racing: Stage 5 - "The Corridor"

Featuring a long walk down a narrow alley engaging shotgun targets (including 'flippers', which launch Clay Pigeons straight into the air), then a rush to pick up a rifle at the end of the corridor to engage a plethora of "Metric" targets, this stage challenges the shooter at every step.

The early shotgun targets are monolithic, until the US Poppers begin flinging hunter-orange pigeons. These are NOT "extra credit" targets; if you miss them, you add precious seconds to your stage time.

At a crook in the corridor, the competitor is obliged to discontinue shooting the shotgun.

(Note: a painted white line on a gravel surface does NOT constitute a legal Fault Line. Nobody had a problem knowing when they could no longer engage shotgun targets, though, because the 'fault line' was sited at the bend in "The Corridor". This "Box B" was carefully delineated by brightly painted 2x4 boards.)

After depositing the shotgun in a box, the shooter was free to pick up his rifle and engage all rifle targets as they became visible ... which involved a lot of backing up. Although the shooter never moved downrange of the grounded shotgun, some competitors decided that they had to 'safe' the shotgun by unloading it. This is probably a good illustration of "World Series Nerves", as is often seen in the most important baseball games which are characterized by the most awkward errors in judgement of the competitive season.

I was able to watch only two shooters on this stage: Phil Brodahl (a "local hero" and winner of the Heavy Metal Division" and Ryan Richardson, who is unknown to me. I was impressed by their aggressive approach to the stage. You will be too, when you watch the video.

Monday, July 16, 2007

R&R Racing - Match Results

To those of you among the 62 competitors in this most excellent match ... congratulations! Chauncey Gardener gives you the greatest possible accolade.

You were fun to watch!

The results are available on the "NW Challenge Home" page (although by match day, it had been changed to the "R&R Racing Multigun" match.)

Here's a quick summary for those of you who hate to click on links:

OVERALL AGGREGATE
: Top Ten

  1. Taran Butler (TO)
  2. Robert Johnson (O)
  3. Chuck Anderson (TO)
  4. Chuck Mahoney (TO)
  5. Beven Grams (O)
  6. Trevor Ott (TO)
  7. Larry Lebeau (O)
  8. Gary Purcell (TO)
  9. Scott Hawkins (TO)
  10. Gordon Baladad (TO)
Top Open (O):
Robert Johnson

Top Tactical Iron Sights (TI):
Kirk Jameson

Top Tactical Optical (TO):
Taran Butler

Top Heavy Metal (HM):
Phil Brodahl

STAGES:


  1. Lined Up and Ready 2 Roll (Rifle, Shotgun)
  2. 4X4X4 and More (Rifle, Shotgun)
  3. Mr. Beal's Best (Pistol, Shotgun)
  4. Rock Around the Croc (Pistol, Shotgun)
  5. The Corridor (Shotgun, Rifle)
  6. 4's A Crowd (Shotgun, Pistol)
  7. Breaching Doors (Shotgun, Rifle)
  8. Crazy Zebras (Pistol, Rifle)
  9. Stalled in Stalingrad (Pistol, Rifle)
  10. Survivor II: The Maze (Rifle, Pistol)
Note that (a) the weapons are entered in the sequence in which they were used; (b) two guns ... no more, no less ... were used on every stage; (c) Stage 1 (the long-range rifle) had a 180-second time limit, perhaps as a response to the 10+ minute runs on the Area 1 Multigun long-range rifle stage; (d) Scoring was 'tactical', in that the time is the raw score and penalty seconds are added for errors; (e) I have some excellent videos and still photos taken during this match; (f) I have NO photos or stills of Stage 8 -- Crazy Zebras -- for the reason that I never found a squad on the stage when I walked past it; (g) these pictures and videos are being loaded to Jerry the Geek's Video Shooting Gallery and eventually ALMOST all of them will appear.

FeedBack:
If you shot the match, I strongly encourage you to join competitor Joe Durnbaugh in contribution to the Feed-Back Page for this match. (This is a feature you won't see at most IPSC/USPSA matches.)

Impressions:

The most visually interesting stage (from the viewpoint of the spectator) was Stage 7: "Breaching Doors". Hands down, no contest, this was a blast to watch. I've already posted videos of Taran Butler, Chuck Anderson and Beven Grams in the article "Super-Size It", and the Klein boys (Grandfather Jeff, son Jason and grandson Jacob) in "The Klein Family". I'm always pleased to see evidence that this is indeed a Family Sport, but when you get three generations in one squad it's something between A Real Treat To Watch and an affirmation of my personal bias.

There's more than one reason why I didn't get film of Stage 8: "Crazy Zebras". I hated that stage when I first shot it as a pistol-only stage in the 2005 Crazy Croc Match, and I admit I didn't make any special effort to find a squad on the stage during the R&R Racing match. It's an excellent, very challenging stage but one can only take so many targets with the C/D zones almost entirely masked out. In this stage, there were 30 of them.

ARRGGGGHHHHHH!

Stage 1 and Stage 2 were rifle/shotgun stages, which combined the agonizing combination of slow long-range rifle shooting and slow shotgun reloading.


I know, I know, the challenge to high-round-count shotgun stages is not quite so much the actual shooting as it is the ability to reload quickly and the 'don't-miss-because-it-will-cost-you-reload-time' factor. There were a LOT of stages with shotguns -- seven out of ten. I spent a lot of time watching people reload their shotgun, and I often caught myself sub-vocalizing "come on, come on, hurry up, hurry up!" during the reload part. Some of the reload were amazingly well timed and executed, and I was impressed. But I also saw a lot of people passing up targets because the miss penalty just wasn't worth the time it took to reload ... or at least they seemed to think so.

For comparison, there were 5 stages requiring use of a pistol, and 8 stages requiring use of a rifle.

SCORING:

I talked to Bob Higbie, RO of Stage 9. He explained to me that the scores were based on target 'neutralization', and time. Paper targets which had at least one hit in the A-zone were considered neutralized, but if they had two hits anywhere in a scoring zone they were considered neutralized. Misses, targets not neutralized and penalties added time to your score. The lowest time won the stage.


Match Staff:

No description of a match would be complete without mention of the people who actually worked the match. I know I won't be able to mention all of the workers, and for those many who I seem to slight, I apologize. I just want to mention a few people I actually watched and spoke to.

Brent Reddeway worked the Area 1 three-gun two weeks ago, last week he took his wife to visit family in The Dakotas, and the next Monday morning he showed up at the range to help set up the stages ... at least one day, he was the only one available to assist MD Bobby Wright. Then he worked Stage 10 with only one helper. He has a great tan, and he has lost at least 20 pounds since the last time I saw him.

Steve Shippey, an Albany Rifle and Pistol Club -- ARPC -- member (and President-Elect of the club) worked Stage 5 with NO assistance. He was always cheerful and helpful, but assume this of ALL the RO staff, and especially assume this of "The Shipster" because this is his usual mien. Note also that his website "2alphas" is the host of the match and the site where the stage procedures and match results are located.

Gary Taylor worked Stage 6 all by himself. When Jason Klein had completed Stage 7 with a huge number of feeding problems with both shotgun and rifle, he asked me where he could function test his guns. I dropped back downhill to Gary's stage and asked him if Jason could use his stage (there was nobody on it at the time) for that purpose. Gary replied "Sure, as long as he doesn't shoot any of the targets and as long as you spell my name right".

"T - O - O - L - M - A - N". Hope I got it right, Gary, and thanks for making us all look good to our visitors.

Bill Salberg worked the most complicated and difficult short-range stage (Stage 7) with one helper, whose name I unfortunately didn't catch. Sorry. He dealt with difficult, hot, tired competitors in his usual cheery manner and fixed an over-taxed 'breach-door' with the loan of a Leatherman between shooters with no delay in the stage. He handled busted targets, competitor controversy (see Bevin Grams in "Super Size It") and probably gave at least one too many re-shoots when he thought it was justified. Between squads, he offered to loan me his guns and ammunition and gear to shoot the stage "just for fun", and I was too chicken to take him up on his generous offer. I was afraid I would like it too much, and right now I just can't afford to start 3-gun competition with an STI pistol, a Mossberg 590 and a WWII Garand. I know I would be out buying guns, dies, bullets and cases within the week. But thanks anyway, Bill.

Bill lost his father last week to an extended bout with Cancer, but he never let it show.

Mike "Mac" McCarter, past president of ARPC, current Executive Director, Director of the IPSC discipline, and candidate for USPSA President (and if there is a God in heaven, he will win the race for the good of USPSA) spent a lot of days in the sun for this match. A tireless worker, a strong leader, and the best John Deere Tractor driver in the county, this former nurseryman not only keeps the club facilities in top shape 3 days a week but even brought in a small grove of potted trees to decorate the North Range road. He hauled water to the shooting bays, and performed whatever dirty little job was needed to make the match run smoothly.

Heidi Salman and Ed Dailey worked the stats shack. Heidi (I didn't recognize her without a gun in her holster) was Stats Mistress, and Ed willingly and cheerfully performed any other chores needed ... if you ate lunch at the match, credit Ed. He sorted the lunch orders, made sure they got where they needed to be when you were hungry.

When I showed up at the match at 9am my first stop was the Stats Shack. My slightest request for assistance was cheerfully and willingly obliged. Heidi printed out a competitor list and stage & squad schedules while Ed printed out the stage descriptions (all of which I have used to write this article). They did ALL of this while I was eating my breakfast at a table in the Stats Shack and writing the stage numbers, bays and names in my notebook. Without their help I couldn't have kept track of who shot which stage when, their names (including correct spelling) and which photo/video related to which competitor.

Robert Johnson is "The Other R" in "R&R Racing". He spent most of his time during the match on his four-wheel ATV running stage score-sheets between the bays and the Stats Shack for Heidi and Ed, and the rest of the time responding to the RO radio net and making sure that the match ran smoothly. During the staff match (Thursday and Friday), he also won Open Division and Second Overall.


Match Director Bobby Wright spend the last couple of months planning, coordinating, designing stages, building stages, finding sponsors for a $30,000 prize table (doubtless with the assistance of CCS Section Competition Director Chuck Anderson) and improvising new props. If you liked the "Breaching" door, you can thank Bobby. As far as I know, this was entirely his original design. I looked for it on the R&R Website and couldn't find it. Bobby, you have got to get this on the market. I predict that it will be a popular prop for future Multi-Gun and 3-gun matches.

Bobby ("Robert?") spent his match driving the Dragon-Mo-Bile back and forth at great speed, usually with either daughter Kaitlyn or son Jesse hanging on and trying not to laugh with glee. his wife, Lili, was all over the range helping get score-sheets to Heidi and Ed and handling such other administrative chores as they came up.

He even found time to shoot the RO Match. Well, maybe a LITTLE time. According to the Aggregat Scores, this Master-Class competitor came in next to last; he didn't have time to shoot 6 of the 10 stages.

Dead last shooter? Heidi ... she only found time to shoot ONE of the 10 stages.

That's what I call dedication.

For what it's worth: if only because of the stage designs I consider this match to be not only better than the Area 1 Multigun match last week, but even better than the USPSA Multigun Match last year at ARPC.

Sunday, July 15, 2007

R&R Racing Stage 7: Super-Size it!

Those of you who have watched the videos in the previous post may be under the impression that it illustrates the ability of lesser competitors to fail the challenges of new props and targets.

Not at all! Even the very best competitors can screw up a stage, especially when the targets (including those which offer no point-value for hits, such as the door locks on this stage) are entirely new to us.

In the included video, Taran Butler manages a new-definitive example of how to shoot this stage ... if cautiously (which may be the best approach).

Chuck Anderson follows his example, taking his time on the new stuff (and, like Butler, may eschew the extra point-value of the Clay Pidgeon launched by the 'flipper' US Popper) to the advantage of loading one less round in his shotgun.

The whole point of shotgun stages seems to be minimizing reload time. I find this a depressing commentary on shotgun shooting in Multigun, but I guess it's a sad fact of life and the clever competitor recognizes his limitations.

Beven Grams, on the other hand, takes the bit firmly between his teeth and attempts a 'non-standard' approach to breaching the door. While all other competitors backed off so as to give the shot pattern distance to expand, he bravely advances and puts his shotgun muzzle within inches of the breaching bar -- and misses. Three times.

He learns from this sad experience, and used sufficient distance from the second door to breach it with fewer rounds.


Moving from Shotgun to Rifle, Grams moves aggressively to the middle-distance Rifle-target array and shoots the stuffing out of it ... breaking the sticks supporting the cardboard target and blasting all of the tapes off it. (Although, when watching the video, Grams doesn't seem to engage the targets at a much closer distance than did Butler and Anderson.)

When Range Officer Bill Sahlberg is called upon to score the target, he announces:


Is it neutralized? Hell yes!



However, after the stage scoring is completed and it becomes obvious that the IPSC targets must be replaced, he does take Mr. Grams to task to task and shakes a finger at him. (The ever-indomitable Grams doesn't seem very contrite, which seems reasonable to me. And Sahlberg is clearly admonishing Grams in an entirely joking manner.)

Still, Sahlberg is witnessed to counsel a later competitor thus:

"What Beven did? Don't do it!"
The thing to do is to not restrict close-access to targets by fault lines and careful positioning, of course. Sahlberg knows that, Grams knows, that, and we assume that the stage designer knows it. If we're going to allow shooters to move close enough to a target to blast the tapes off and break the supporting sticks, we must be prepared to live with the consequences when it happens.

Watch all three runs at "Breaching Doors" here, and decide for yourself.

R&R Racing Stage 7: The Klein Family

Stage 7 of the 2007 R&R Racing Multigun Match is called "Breaching Doors".


For this stage, Bobby Wright has created a new stage prop. It's a door frame which must be opened by blasting the lock with a shotgun charge. The competitor must completely sever the locking mechanism (a 1" diameter wooden 'lock') before he is able to continue to the first shooting position.

This stage actually features two doors, so both 'locks' must be 'blasted' open. Sometimes, this works fine. Sometimes, this doesn't work as well as might reasonably be expected.

I watched the match this weekend, and took a lot of pictures and filmed a lot of videos. My attention was focused most often on this entirely new stage design, because it was eminently viewable (the few vision barriers were composed of 'snow fencing', so spectators could see what the competitors were doing at almost every position of the stage).


Also, this new stage prop was cleverly designed to present an unique challenge to the competitor, while making it easy for the stage crew to set up for the next competitor. In fact, it took less time to set up the two 'doors' than it would ordinarily take a stage crew to reset most target activators.

There were ZERO delays on the stage because of the need to reset this prop (twice featured on Stage 7) because of the simple and robust design of the door mechanism. The only delay ... and it lasted no more than a minute ... was when one competitor muscled his way through the door and slightly damaged the opening mechanism. Repairs by Chief Range Officer Bill Sahlberg were simple, intuitive and easy.



While filming this stage, I noticed that three of the competitors were surnamed "Klein". Grandfather Jeff, son Jason and grandson Jacob demonstrated three different approaches to the stage. Unfortunately, Jason experienced many firearm malfunctions ... both with the initiating Shotgun and the follow-up Rifle ... which dramatically extended his stage time.

In the video, you can hear Jacob exclaiming excitedly as his father determinately fights the malfunctions.

And you can see the way the door works.


Saturday, July 14, 2007

Multi-Gun in Oregon

UPDATE July 10: Weather for the weekend - mid 80's, partly cloudy. Dress in light-weight, light colored, loose clothes. Drink lots of water and keep that sunblock handy!

R&R Racing NW Multigun Challenge
July 14 - 15 at Albany Rifle & Gun Club. (Directions to range)

See the details at:

Cogito Ergo Geek: Albany Oregon Multi-Gun Matches


(Note: this will stay at the top of the Blog until the matches complete.)

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

Hot July Blogmeat


It's hot. Too hot. (Well, Al, it's HIGH SUMMER!) And I've been overwhelmed with the desire to complete editing videos from the Area 1 Multigun match.

When Bad Bloggers get bored, they resort to writing about what OTHER people say and do. Here in Geekistan, we call that ...

Blogmeat!

July 10, 2007 - (WND) - Anti-gun Activist Makes Illegal Gun Purchase.




John Rosenthal (you remember him? "Stop Handgun Violence" (SHV), "American Hunters and Shooters Association" (AHSA)), admitted on a radio talk-show that he had made a "straw purchase" of a firearm in a state in which he was not a resident. He apparently enlisted the help of Boston Globe reporter Steve Bailey, which included both the funds for the purchase (courtesy of the Globe) and an in-state resident ("a prison guard") who made the actual purchase.

Is this not cause for prosecution? Not only is it a deliberate, flagrant violation of federal law, but also a conspiracy to violate the law. An internet search does not disclose a story of Rosenthal, Bailey or the 'prison guard'. What are the chances that NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg will follow up on this? None? Right!

At the SHV website, under "Learn" / "Gun Laws", Rosenthal boasts that:
Stop Handgun Violence was the lead agency in a coalition that came together to pass the Gun Control Act of 1998 (Chapter 180), the most comprehensive gun legislation in the nation.
Yet Rosenthal has conspired to violate the current law. How disingenuous, John.

The AHSA website claims:
AHSA vigorously defends the constitutional right to keep and bear arms, promotes safe and responsible gun use, and supports reasonable public policies, so that all Americans can enjoy the benefits of this crucial and historic liberty.
... yet their website also cites the long-disproved (by Dave Kopel, among others) "43-to-1" Kellerman assertion that "a firearm kept in the home is 43 times more likely to kill a family member than an intruder". The context is cleverly hidden (as are all the gun-control messages here) under the cover of saying "Yes, we think you should be able to keep a gun in the home for self-defense, but consider this".

How disingenuous, John.
__________________________________________

In a shocking revelation (which will NOT be picked up by AP, Reuters, CBS, MS_NBS or most of the other MainStreamMedia), the Houston Chronicle reveals that not only is Katrina Hurricane not the most most damaging hurricane in American History in terms of damage or lives cost, it is actually just one of many similarly powerful weather effects during the past 110 years.
Under the new analysis, which adjusted for inflation, population and coastal development, Hurricane Katrina and its $81 billion cost ranked second to the Great Miami Hurricane of 1926, which caused damage estimated at almost $140 billion. Another Galveston hurricane, in 1915, ranked fourth with $57 billion in damage.
Alert Readers will note that the key years 1926 and 1915 occurred well before the common ownership of automobiles and the proliferation of atmospheric petrochemicals (and Carbon Dioxide) caused by the Evil Internal Combustion Engine.

Yet the Global Warming Wombats continue to blame all the ills of the world on Henry Ford and his Affordable Automobile.


They might pay a little attention to the "Live Earth" concerts just concluded, and poorly attended.

The "Live Earth Johannesburg officials blame climate change for poor turn-out".
Organiser John Langford believes extremely cold weather in the region - it snowed last week for the first time in a quarter of a century - kept people away from the concert, which starred Joss Stone, UB40, Angelique Kidjo and Baaba Maal. Speaking before the event, Langford said, "We're expecting 10,000 here tonight. It's a bit chilly, and we've had a strange winter... is it climate change? We had snow in Jo'burg last week for the first time in 25 years." But critics have blamed poor publicity for the weak turn-out.
On the other hand, apologists for the London "Live Earth" concert contend that the concert was under-attended because the weather was too warm, and potential attendees opted to go to the beach.

Our thought is that the Global Warming crowd is prepared to credit "Global Warming" with whatever warming upsets their plans. If it's too hot: Global Warming. If it's too cold: Global Warming.

It seems as if the Scientific Method is entirely too passe these days.

Friday, July 06, 2007

A1MG Stage 5 - "Burn Down The House"

This "rifle only" stage might very well be more properly referenced as "The Malf Stage", as I saw as many firearms malfunctions on this single stage as I saw on any three of the other stages in this match.

Why, I wonder, should this be true?

In my limited experience, and only as a spectator at this match, I can only conclude that the competitors were "pushing the envelope" in terms of firearms reliability. This 30-round Rifle stage presents challenges not really represented by any other stage in the match. (Indeed, it may be one of the paramount strengths of this match that the stages provide such a variety of shooting problems.)

The round-count is most important, in that it appears to offer a premium for a competitor who can engage all of the targets without reloading. This may or may not be true, but the suggestion is there. The lure to stuff as many rounds as possible into your fattest magazine (or pair of magazines) is there. And the irresistable temptation to challenge the capacity of your firearm ... is there.

Add to this temptation the fact that all of the targets are close, easy, and an open invitation to turn this otherwise indistinguised stage design into -- A Hoser Stage!

The result was far too often a dismal disappointment to competitors who had, they felt, reasonable expectations of Smoking The Stage.

This did not often happen, except in the case of those competitors who went into it with the intention of surviving the Siren's Song.

Those who did well on this stage seemed to be those who poured a libation to the gods of Functional Reliability, planned to reload at least once during the stage, and played it fast and not-very-loose.

In evidence of that theory, I offer the Video of The Malf Stage.


Thursday, July 05, 2007

A1MG - Stage 9: "Get 'Er Done" (Gordon Baladad)

The point of "Multigun" competition (MG), rather than "3-gun" competition, is that the competitors may be required to demonstrate their profeciency with two or three firearms in a single stage.

In the USPSA 2007 Area 1 Multigun Match, all three firearms types (Pistol, Shotgun, Rifle) were used in only two stages:

Stage 4: Draining the Swamp

Stage 9: Get 'Er Done


It's difficult to choose 'the most excellent stage' between the two.

Essentially, Stage 4 pre-positioned the three guns 20 yards away from each other, and featured relatively close targets for each gun. The competitor had no choice in determining the order in which he would use each firearm to engage the appropriate target arrays, but there was a lot of movement involved. Essentially, that 'lot of movement' was running as fast as you could from position "A", where you had just used your pistol, to position "B", where you used your shotgun, and thence to position "C", where you used your rifle to finish the stage.

The distance between competitor and target was about 10 yards for pistol (large, cardboard Metric targets), 15 yards for shotgun (Steel plates), and 15 to 25 yards for rifle (more large, cardboard Metric targets).



In a dramatic comparison, Stage 9 put the competitor in a 'structure' (designed to look like an 'airplane', if you had a good imagination' and put all three firearms in boxes within easy reach. The competitor never moved out of the 'airplane'. In fact, it was theoretically possible to shoot all three arrays without moving your feet.

You use your pistol to engage 4 IPSC 'Metric' targets at 20-25 yard range. Some of the targets were partially obscured with white 'penalty' targets.


You use your shotgun to engage 8 steel plates (Pepper Poppers, US Poppers, heavy 'tombstone' plates and a single 8" round plate) at about 15 yards.

And you use your rifle to engage 6 'flasher' steel plates at varying ranges. At about 75 yards there are four targets ... an 8" steel plate, two 12" steel plates, and a US Popper. At about 120 yards there are two 12" steel plates. (I'm guessing at the actual target dimensions, but that's what they looked like from the shooting position.)

The difference between the two stages is that Stage 4 featured relatively close, relatively easy targets with movement between each array and the choice of sequence of target array engagement was fixed; while Stage 9 featured much more distant targets, no movement (other than whether to shoot sitting down or standing up) and the competitor was allowed to choose the order in which he engaged each array.

In the actual event, the target selection and distance on Stage 4 did not seem particularly challenging, speaking as a casual observer. The stage clearly provided an advantage to the competitor who could most quickly move (run!) from one position to the next.

On Stage 9, however, the ability of the competitor to run fast was never tested. The only skills involved were the ability to change from one gun to the next, and the ability to actually hit the targets accurately in the shortest possible amount of time. The fact that this stage design required the competitor to engage all targets from a single 3' square structure tested most rigorously the ability to actually SHOOT.

More, it also required the competitor to choose the tactics which most closely suited his individual skills set. The competitors had to actually THINK about what they were going to do, when they were going to do it, and the way in which they 'abandoned' one gun and picked up another may have an influence on the amount of time needed to complete the stage.

For example, if the competitor chose to shoot the rifle first, it may be awkward to 'abandon' a rifle with a fixed bipon in the same box in which the shotgun rested. Would the shotgun be tangled in the rifle bipods? In that case, it may be better to shoot the Shotgun first, and pick up the Rifle later.

On the other hand, as long as you are already sitting down, it might be better to shoot the Rifle first. If no bipod is involved, it may be a smooth and efficient thing to change guns while standing up, going directly to the Shotgun and finishing off with the pistol.

On Stage 9, I saw competitors using all tactical variations in the order in which they used each firearms, and not all of them were as advantageous as the shooter had obviously hoped they would be. I saw one "heavy-metal" shooter using an iron-sighted .308 finish with the rifle targets, use nearly 4 minutes to NOT get all the rifle targets, to the point where he had sweated into his eyes and quit without hitting all the far targets. He threw up his hands, tossed his earmuffs and hat, and buried his face in a towel to get rid of the perspiration stinging his eyes.

Here is a video of one Tactical shooter, Gordon Baladad, who chose to shoot Rifle/Shotgun/Pistol. it worked well for him, and I was able to film from a position right behind the 'airplane'. The video will serve to show what it's like to shoot this stage.


Note that these videos are also available here in the original WMV version on Jerry the Geek's Video Shooting Gallery. This video is a 10mb download

A1MG - Range Master Clarification

After I posted my video on Stage 3: "Don't Rock The Boat" I received an email from that match's Range Master (and NASSAONLINE.COM partner) Tom Chambers. He provided some information which I didn't have before. I thought you might be interested, so when I asked him if I could post his email here, he graciously gave his permission:

A few points of 'clarification' on your blog.

The seat on the dinghy runs lengthwise-there was no board sitting on seats. Shooter sat on the seat, straddling it or with both feet on one side and the shotgun was on the seat in front of the shooter. BTW, I built that dinghy almost 20 years ago to use on my sailboat where it did yeoman's service all over the northwest, including 2 trips to the San Juans and a trip up the west side of Vancouver Island. It's been sitting and rotting on my back patio for the last 7 years and I thought it was time to give it at least one more chance at being useful.

Stage 8, "Field of Dreams" , the long range rifle stage that got tossed had 5 targets that you engaged 3 times for a total of 15 targets. The 3 at 300 yards were worth 10 points each(a miss would be -20 pts) and the 2 at 350 yards were worth 20 pts each and a miss there was -40 pts.

We had just 2 squads get through this stage in 4-1/2 hours. This was the only stage where I had assigned stage RO's. They tried very hard to move it along but their efforts were in vain. I gave one of them a break and ran the last 4-5 shooters. One of them took 750 seconds and hit 4 of the 15 targets, expending 170 rounds in the attempt. There was no way we could get the other 60 shooters through during the match so Mike and I made the decision to toss the stage out.

The Montrose Toast

I think that this should be the thought of every man
who steps up to the starting line and takes his gun in hand.

The Montrose Toast defines it all, the weakling never wins;
'Tis courage that determines who goes home with Winner's pins.

He either fears his fate too much
Or his deserts are small,
That puts it not unto the touch
To win or lose it all.
-- John Graham, Marques of Montrose
(1612 - 1650)
from "My Dear and Only Love"

Wednesday, July 04, 2007

It's Berkley!

[sigh!]

I've done it again.

I mis-spelled the name of my Internet Host.

Brian BERKLEY has gone the extra mile during the past three years to not only host Jerry the Geek's Video Shooting Gallery, but also a lot of "other files" which I have from time to time considered necessary to support this blog.

He supported my efforts to convince the Albany Rifle and Pistol Club to use their space for my files. So far, I have well over 2GB on the server. Since I've evolved into the sorta unofficial photographer for the Columbia Cascade Section, they feel that I can share the space they've already paid for.

And when his hosting service was becoming too busy for him to handle alone, Brian not only found a faster server in Texas and transferred many of my files there, but he worked with them to set up the software necessary to support the Gallery.

What have I done for him?

I spelled his name wrong.

Every stinking time, I throw an extra "E" in there. It was bad enough that I spelled it wrong last year when I wrote an article about Mike McCarter and the Annual Single Stack Tournament which he hosts under the auspices of the Albany Rifle and Pistol Club. I apologised for that, and promised it would never happen again.

But I did it again this week, when I was blogging about the 2007 Area 1 Multigun Match.

How lower than a serpeant's ass I feel.

This time, I vow ... never again!


I've written his name on a file folder label, and pasted it to my monitor.

Maybe I'll even remember to 'look it up' the next time I write about him.

We'll see. I'll be featuring Brian in some of the Multigun videos I'll post in the next week. Let's just see if I can get it right.

And if I don't?

Brian will just point it out to me, without comment. But I'll know I've disappointed him.

Again.

[sigh!'

Monday, July 02, 2007

A1MG Stage 3 - Don't Rock The Boat

As mentioned earlier, Stage 3 was probably the funnest stage in the 2007 Area 1 Multigun Tournament. It balanced (and I use the word advisedly) fast shotgun with not-so-fast mid-range rifle shooting.


It may not have been quite so fun during the shooting of the stage. We watched as each competitor stepped into the boat for the first time, and every one looked just like a cat trying to coax himself into the water. That first cautious paw -- er, foot -- withdrawn when the flat-bottom boat began rocking on the hard plywood platform, was an almost universal response. Everyone used both hands to brace on the gunwales of the boat and kept most of the body weight there until both feet were inside the boat. Then the experimentation with where to put the feet, where to sit.
Then the shotgun, loaded and placed so it is sitting on a board placed longitudinally on the boat seats. Most found that they could straddle that board, put the butt of the shotgun on the board between their legs, and rest the barrel of the shotgun on the bow of the boat.

A few decided to put both feet on the right side of the board, since they were going to shoot the first eight steel plates on that side. (See the stage setup here at NASSONLINE in PDF format.)

SHOTGUN TARGETS:

Of course, I didn't watch every competitor who shot this stage, but those I did watch all opted to shoot the first 8 targets from the boat, reloading in the boat if necessary to complete the array. Then they exited the boat (under the emphasis of adrenaline, MUCH less cautiously than they had entered) and stood on the dock to reload. One Open shooter, Craig Outzen, opted to reload before and during his exit. Hard to tell if there was any advantage.

Outzen's performance is depicted in the video included below.

Still, the stage procedures allowed engagement of all targets from the dock, and I didn't witness that. In the actual event, it seemed to matter little whether you shot the first eight shotgun targets sitting down or standing up, the boat didn't actually rock much once you became familiar with the balance point. The boat with move with every shot, but it looked easy enough to compensate.

Perhaps that's why this stage was more fun for the spectators than for the competitors.

RIFLE TARGETS:

After placing the shotgun in the box, the competitors retrieved their rifles from the other box on the dock. There were eight cardboard "Metric" targets downrange, and white 'penalty' targets covered most of the shooting area of each target. Although the range to the targets was short of 25 yards, it left only a very small scoreable target area for each shot. I was impressed that (a) there were fewer miss/noshoot penalties recorded, (b) the winner of the Open division won even though he had a ten-point procedural penalty, and (c) the winner of the Tactical division completed the stage in only 0.52 seconds more time (with a higher raw hit factor) than the winner of the Open division.

Division winners for this 160-point stage:


LIMITED: Kyle Nice (58.15 seconds, 156 points)
OPEN: Robert Johnson (45.10 seconds, 150 points - 10 penalty points)
TACTICAL: Carl Carbon (45.62 seconds, 149 points)

The Video:
Featured competitors, in order of appearance -
  • David Heyden
  • Darrell Humphrey
  • Chris Schiatano
  • Craig Outzen
  • Gordan Balladad
  • Carl Schmidt



Area 1 2007 Multigun Match Results - McCarter Interview

The match results for The A2 MG match can be seen at the USPSA Website - click on "Match Schedule and Results" on the left-hand sidebar, and the resulting webpage has the "Area 1 Multigun Championship" as (currently) the fourth item. Click on that and you can see the match results except that the last names of the competitors are indicated only with an initial. This is done to protect the privacy of the competitors.

However, if you're a member of USPSA you can see the full-names in the match results by clicking on the "Member Page" icon at the top of the USPSA home page and entering your userid and password. Again, click on the "Match Schedule and Results" sidebar button and follow the above directions.

Here's what you get:


2007 Area 1 Multi-Gun Championship
Albany Rifle and Pistol Club
6/29/2007
Division Name USPSA Competitors
Limited Patrick Kelley -- 21
Open Robert Johnson -- 20
Tactical Carl Carbon -- 42
Total: 83

(I've deleted USPSA Member Numbers from this display) .

"Field Of Dreams" Stage Thrown Out:

Note that only nine (9) stages are listed. The long-range rifle stage ("Field of Dreams") was thrown out of the match due to the excessive stage times. This WAS the biggest choke-point of the match, with some competitors actually registering times of 700 seconds on this stage.

There were only five targets, but they were presented at 300 to 350 yards distance. There were three positions -- two standing, one prone -- and competitors were required to engage all five targets from each position.

As many as two squads were backed up on this stage, and according to Match Director Mike McCarter they had to drop the stage to allow all competitors to complete the match. The first day, each squad was expected to complete seven stages. Some squads were on the range until after 7pm the first day. Some squads still had 5 stages to shoot on the second day.

McCarter notes that "this is a young sport" and match administrators are still learning from experience. Chances are that long-range rifle stages will be much simpler in future Multigun matches. In the 2006 Multigun Nationals (held July 7, 2006 on this same range) similar problems were encountered with this kind of stage.

USPSA On Top Of The Problem:

In a telephone interview tonite, McCarter stated that Area 1 Director Bruce Gary had already begun the process of bringing these and other Multigun problems to the attention of the USPSA Board of Directors with the intention of establishing a change in the competitor rules allowing the match to set a time limit on stages.

Moving Targets
One of the successes noted by Mr. McCarter was that the eight moving targets experienced ZERO Range Equipment Malfunctions. This was due, according to McCarter, with the "hinged sticks" designed by USPSA RM Jay Worden.

These are 1" square wooden sticks which have been sawn apart in the middle, then rejoined with a simple metal hinge. An eye-screw is affixed to the stick near the hinge, and the cable to the activating device attached to this eye-screw. Further, the joint between the two halves have been sanded so that there is a slight bend in the assembly, so that the stick looks like a leg with the knee joint where the hinge is. It's intuitively obvious how to set the stick correctly ("Eye-screw toward the activator") in the target array, and it breaks reliably every time.

Cost of construction: under a dollar, and you can make one in your garage in a few minutes. No, the eye-screws don't pull out of the wood because the stick 'breaks' so easily.

"Snipe hunt" 28-round Shotgun Slug stage:
McCarter also discussed the problems with shooting a large number of slug rounds through a shotgun on a single stage. This stage included a number of IPSC targets to be engaged at relatively close ranges, but also some steel targets at ranges of about 50 feet. Shooting 12-guage Shotgun Slugs is a grueling exercise in pain management, as soon as the adrenaline wears off. He suggested that the wave of the future for Multigun shotguns may be moving to 20 guage. These are still classified as Major Power, and using a sabot round further aleviates the punishment, according to McCarter.

I'm not sure if Benelli makes a 20 guage auto shotgun comparable to the 12-guage guns which are currently so popular with Open Division competitors, but this sounds as if it might be worth looking into for Multigun matches next year.

Sunday, July 01, 2007

2007 Area 1 Multigun - Still Photos

It's 11:30 Sunday Night. The match is over, I don't have access to the results (yet), and I have 3.5GB of photographs and videos from the match to sort, edit and present. I'm sun-burnt, bug-bitten, achy from standing all day for 2 days, tired and I stink of sweat, dirt and sun-blocker.

There's no way I can present all of the stories I have to tell before I pack it in for the night. I've been downloading files from my Digital Geek-cam and sorting through them for the past seven hours.


I could tell you about Darrell losing a shoe un-assing the boat on "Don't Rock The Boat", the guy who swept me with his AR this morning, Higbie dumping his SUV in the six-foot deep ditch on the other side of the North Road across from Bay 7. (I didn't get to see this, but his squad-mates told me about it and they "almost" put out a call on the Range Officer Radio Network so I could get a photo - but they didn't, which probably saved me from embarrassing a friend.)


Also, I could talk about the old buddys I saw, whom I haven't seen for months or years but they came out to just WATCH a by-Gawd honest-to-Pete Multigun match. This was much the same as I did, devoting my entire weekend to take pictures and talk to (and listen to) the 84 people who paid good money just so they could fight heat, insects, equipment malfunctions (theirs) and very FEW Range Equipment Malfunctions (the host club) for the honor and glory of saying they went there and did that.

I couldn't do that. Well, I could if I was willing/able to invest a ton of money and a slew of time to indulge myself in the masochism which is MultiGun competition.


(I could even tell you about the $37,000 Prize Table ... but I won't. Except that Chuck Anderson -- Columbia Cascade Section Competition Director -- performed his usual magic with the Vendor Community. Thank you, Vendors, for sponsoring an excellent match!)

I covered the 2006 USPSA MultiGun Nationals a year ago (less a week), and I was impressed then. The quality of this match was no less. And the quality of the people I talked to ... and didn't get to talk to ... is similarly impressive.

Awesome Al Austen showed up. He hasn't shot an IPSC pistol match for a year, but he came by to support his pal Higbie (he of the semi-drowned SUV). Dan Nelson, who has been out of the IPSC circuit for two years as he tried to build a new business, was there as a competitor. He admitted he couldn't remember which end of the gun pointed down-range, but he got through the weekend without insurmountable problems.

I filmed a lot of people, and by the 2nd day I began to feel self-conscious about it. It seemed that every time I turned the camera on, the shooters ended up fighting equipment problems. Chuck Anderson found that Remington shotgun shells were just a little bit off-spec, causing extraction problems. Bruce Gary (AD1) forgot that loading Siamese-Twin magazines in his AR caused feeding problems if they were fully loaded. Brian Berkley had problems with both his AR and his Shotgun when I filmed him. (Brian said: "I don't care, I volunteered to help run the match. The actual shooting is just a bonus, I'm not here to win. I just came out to shoot.")

Brian's attitude was representative of a lot of people there, who just wanted to shoot.

John Clark said he got half-way through a stage and discovered that the stock of his shotgun was coming loose! He just shoved the stock back against the action, held it tight with his shoulder, and kept on shooting. He got through the stage just fine, according to him.

You may notice some familiar names. Most of the folks who were instrumental in presenting this match actually shot the match. Exceptions, of course, were Match Director Mike McCarter and Range Master Tom Chambers.

Here's my impressions of the match:

Worst stage of the match:
The long-range rifle stage ("Field Of Dreams"). With a very small number of targets, competitors couldn't afford to leave a target hit. Rumor has it that some folks shot 200 rounds at five targets, just to avoid a zero score. Well, I probably heard that wrong, but it was certainly a choke point in the match.

I never got around to visiting that stage. Life is too short.


Best stage of the match:
The 'airplane' stage. All three guns, and if you planned to shoot it "pedal to the metal and hair of fire" you were just asking for trouble. It was hot, and after shooting a couple of magazines at the six rifle targets the sweat was rolling into your eyes. I watched a 'heavy metal' shooter (iron sights on a .308) finally throw up his hands after two magazines and throw off his earmuffs, and his hat, just so he could grab a towel and wipe the sweat out of his eyes. Maximum frustration, maximum challenge.



Most boring stage of the match:
Stage 1: "Shooting for Dummies". All pistol, nothing but. Start with a 40-pound dummy over your shoulder, shoot four targets, dump the dummy on a table and shoot the other dozen-or-so targets. Terver Ott dumped the dummy on the table and ... it slid off! He had to go back and lift it onto the table After the stage was over, he came BACK to the table and began pummelling the dummy! (Too bad I had turned the camera off, it was a sight to see.)

I chose this stage for 'most boring', because it was the only all-pistol stage and we see that all the time in regular USPSA matches. In the actual event, it wasn't a bad stage ... just not really 'MultiGun'. The most boring stages to watch (as compared to boring to shoot) were the all-shotgun stages. WAY too much time was spend reloading. I'll include a lot of shotgun video and usually leave in the reloading if only to illustrate the problems of reloading in Tactical and Limited Divisions.

Think there are no problems reloading shotguns in Open division? Think again. All those tubes hanging down along your leg can be problematic when you're trying to move around obstacles. SEE the "Don't Rock The Boat" stage, where Craig Outzen almost stumbles when trying to reload while exiting the boat.

Funniest stage of the match:
"Don't Rock The Boat" You had to shoot at plates with a shotgun while standing in a flat bottom boat which was sitting on a plywood platform. Every time you shot, the boat rocked. Darrell lost a shoe climbing out of the boat, but it didn't slow him down much. He finished the stage with one shoe off, one shoe on, diddle-diddle-dumpling My Son John.

(I actually got the video, which I'll show someday, but I didn't have the camera rolling when he went back after the stage and calmly retrieved his wayward shoe and returned it to the proper foot position.)

By the way, if you're looking at the stage designs at NASSONLINE.COM you'll notice that the stage numbers don't correspond to the stage numbers I cite here. That's because, when it came time to set up the stages, not all of them actually fit well in the designated bays. The match administrators compensated by fitting the physical limitations and didn't worry about the 'paper' version of the match. That's characteristic of the great Mac and Tom team. Whatever it takes to put on a good match.


Tomorrow, I'll start editing videos and will present them either here or on the Geek Video Shooting Gallery. In the meantime, I've selected 81 representative still photos and hosted them on the Gallery. You can look at them and maybe get a reasonable impression of what the range and the match looked like.

Stay tuned: film at 11.

It's now midnight, so that means ... more tomorrow. Maybe I'll even find the link to the Match Results!

Thursday, June 28, 2007

Die Hard Four - The Video

Considering the "Yippie Ki Yah" lines, this is NSFW (Not Safe For Work).

Don't know what the movie looks like, I may go see it this weekend. Couldn't be better than this video, though.



"We don't know but we're pretty sure ...
John McClane Kicks Ass!"

Dave Kopel: Supreme Court Gun Cases

Supreme Court Descriptive Index


In May of 2006, Dave Kopel published a book titled "Supreme Court Gun Cases". (See the link above.)

(Co-authers: Stephen P. Halbrook, Ph.D. and Alan Korwin)

This book is described by Kopel:
"All 92 Supreme Court gun cases are listed here alphabetically, as answered questions, to help you find specific proceedings, and quickly grasp the gun-related elements of the case. Only the questions related to firearms or self defense are listed even if, as is often the case, the decision itself has a different focal point. Many other questions are indeed typically addressed in the cases and, because of the terseness of the questions below, you should rely on the full actual cases for an understanding of the significance of each one. Think of this index as a navigation tool, a memory jogger, and a good read."
That describes the content and utility of the book, certainly, but it also describes the content of the link. The webpage lists all 92 Supreme Court cases alphabetically, by Name, Date and Citation. It also describes the legal questions addressed and a brief one-word (yes or no) answer to the question.

For example, here are the first half-dozen cases cited:


• Indicates the 44 cases presented in their entirety in Supreme Court Gun Cases.
Ð Indicates the 14 self-defense cases.


Key: Name; Date; Citation; Page in Supreme Court Gun Cases

Acers v. United States • Ð; 1896; 164 U.S. 388; 238
Is fear of a deadly attack, without reasonable demonstrated grounds for the fear, sufficient to support a claim of self defense [NO]; Must the danger be immediate [YES]; Can any object be considered as a deadly weapon depending on how it was used [YES].

Adams v. Williams; 1972; 407 U.S. 143; 363
Can a peace officer conduct a limited protective search for concealed weapons, if there is reason to believe a suspect is armed and dangerous [YES]; Are 4th Amendment guarantees violated by such a stop and frisk [NO].

Adamson v. California; 1947; 332 U.S. 46; 310
[The dissenting opinion in a 5th Amendment case argues that the 14th Amendment was intended to incorporate the Bill of Rights, including the 2nd Amendment, against the states].

Alberty v. United States • Ð; 1896; 162 U.S. 499; 231
If a husband sees another man trying to get into his wife’s room window at night is it natural for him to investigate further [YES]; Is the husband under a duty to retreat when attacked with a knife under such circumstances [NO]; May the husband use only as much force as is necessary to repel the assault [YES]; If in an ensuing confrontation the husband shoots and kills the other man, then flees, must his flight in and of itself be seen as evidence of his guilt [NO].

Albright v. Oliver; 1994; 510 U.S. 266; 481
[The dissenting opinion in a case involving freedom from malicious prosecution cites the right to keep and bear arms as among fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution].

Allen v. United States • Ð; 1896; 164 U.S. 492; 241
Are words alone sufficient provocation to justify an assault [NO]; Are words alone sufficient to reduce murder to manslaughter [NO]; Can premeditation and intent to kill be determined from your actions [YES]; Although flight after a possibly criminal event may suggest guilt, does it prove it conclusively [NO].
You can order this book directly from gunlaws.com or from Barnes&Nobel. The price is the same, but one assumes (perhaps incorrectly) that the first vendor returns a greater percentage to the authors, because the Gunlaws website is directly associated with Alan Korwin's "Bloomfield Press".

I haven't yet decided to buy the book, but I have included the link to the summary on my sidebar, under "Reference Sources". This is one of Dave Kopel's "Second Amendment Project" offerings, as is "Dave Kopel 2nd Amendment", linked on the sidebar under the heading of "Other RKBA Websites".

If you have an evening free to do nothing more than expand your understanding of Second Amendment issues, I encourage you to start at Kopel's website. There's a cornucopia of fascinating reading to be found there.

For example, I found a review of Joyce Malcolm's book "Guns and Violence: The English Experience" which Kopel refers to as "The Gold Standard of Gun Control". Here's one paragraph from the review:
Malcolm describes the patterns of gun possession and violence, as well as changes in British culture due to war, food shortages, politics, and crime policy. She pays particular attention to changes in the culture of self-defense, both from the viewpoint of the Crown and of the subjects, and to how crime victims are treated by the government. Formerly, Britons happily contrasted their own permissive gun laws with the repressive laws on the Continent, and considered liberal British laws to exemplify the superior and free character of the British nation. But today, British gun controls are the most severe in the western world.
(Emphasis added)

We've all read the frightening, frustrating news stories about the consequences of severe gun-control laws in England during the past decade, and wondered how the Brits can have so lost their soul. This may help us to understand. Warning: if you assume that the increasingly burdonsome gun-control laws in Great Britain serve only to demonstrate the proclivity of British Government to place its erstwhile citizens under the dominion of an autocratic state, this book may serve only to confirm your convictions.

As I write this, I realize that I have updated this article a half-dozen times as I find ever more fascinating information at this source. It's difficult to resist the temptation to point you to other interesting articles, but for the sake of brevity (long lost in my whirlwind of enthusiasm, I know) I'll leave the rest of the research as an exercise for the reader.

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

That Pesky Second Amendment

Remember that old joke about "Hi! I'm from The Government and I'm here to help!"

The BATFE-men are living up to their reputation, according to a recent article on World-Net Daily.

WND, along with Larry Pratt of Gun Owners of America, accuse the BATMen of using minor irregularities in filling out governmental forms as an excuse to revoke the licenses of gun shops all across the country.

We're not talking about 'willful' acts, such as neglecting to fill out the forms. Instead, the irregularities cited include using "N" instead of "NO" when answering a "yes or no" question on the BATFE forms. Another example: writing "Bltmo" instead of "Baltimore" when naming the city in which the transaction occurs (the forms are notoriously skimpy when trying to cram the required information into the tiny spaces provided ... you have probably noticed this).

According to WND, Pratt notes that "The inspectors have no handbook under which to operate, and the absence of such written procedures allows them to be arbitrary and capricious."

When a shop owner appeals the ruling of BATFE which shuts down the business, it goes directly to BATFE. Not some neutral third party, or a court, but directly to the governmental agency which ruled against the business in the first place. It would be disingenuous to suggest that BATFE could be impartial in this process of 'mediation', since it is one of the original parties.

Pratt told WND, "the power that has enabled ATF to take away people's licenses to do business" continues unabated.
...
The agency holds, he said, a "continuing animas against gun owners and dealers."

80mph 'Mad Max' monster

The 80mph 'Mad Max' monster targeting the Taliban



The Brits have a new not-so-secret weapon ... something of a cross between "The Rat Patrol" and "Mad Max" (Part II).


Trouble is, it's long on offense and very shy on armor.


With a crew of "3 to 4", presumably depending on whether the optional "grenade machine gun" is mounted along with the two 30-cal machine gun (one in a turret-ring) and the rear-facing .50 cal MG, that's four gunners and a driver for ... five crew?

Painted an attractive Caterpillar Yellow, this high-speed vehicle lacks only fork lift prongs and, regrettably, armor plating to defend the crew against those pesky IEDs.

Obviously, this is destined for deployment only for Afghanistan. It would never work in the IED-infested Iraqi theater.

If the American forces tried to field a vehicle like this, they would be laughed (or blasted) Out Of Country in a week.

The best thing the Brits could do is reserve this boondoggle-machine for perimeter security, behind a ten-foot cyclone fence.

Well behind the fence. Say, in the machine shop?

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us


Hard to tell what the Brits were thinking of when they decided to field this anachronism. The African Theater in WWII, perhaps?

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

Painting To The Oldies

This is a dramatic divergence from the usual fare found here, but I assure you it's worth the 5:41 minutes to see the finale.

The artiste is perhaps a bit weak on "stagecraft" but his artistry is beyond dispute.

I bet he's done this before.



Yeah, I re-viewed this several times, and you'll probably find that it runs faster every time you see it.

You can see more here.