Tuesday, June 20, 2006

If you can't beat 'em, change the rules!

Mr. Completely

Sure, I had planned to spend this entire week blogging about the Area 1 match. But sometimes, "Life Happens". In this case, "Life" is defined as "Breaking News" in the Pacific NorthWet.

Today I received an email from "Mister Completely", a fellow PNW Gun Blogger. Apparently he competes in a gungame known as "Falling Plates" (your guess is as good as mine, I've never tried it) and is noticably successful.

As a consequence, the Match Director (I'm still guessing here, as I don't have details) of the local host club decided unilaterally that he was winning too many matches, and the reason is that he has been using a two-handed grip which is, or ought to be, illegal.

Just to make sure that this point is not lost on the local participants, the MD sent out an email which specifically makes it illegal.

The reason the grip on the pistol should not be legal?

The hands are not touching.

Still guessing, this grip lends an unfair advantage to those competitors who are using guns sufficiently long that they can GET two hands on the gun without the hands touching.

Well, that's obviously a big NO-No! Next thing you know, people will be cutting the stocks off rifles and using them in what is purportedly a pistol competition. Then the Equipment Race will just take off, and the sport is no longer do-able for The Average Shooter.

We've seen this trend time and again in IPSC (although with somewhat more substantial justification), although it has never lead to a ban on competitors because of their grip ... usually, it leads to recognition of another division of competition when it involves equipment. One wonders why said MD didn't redefine the sport in terms of equipment instead of, for cryin' out loud, the GRIP!

More often, we've seen this approach used in Gun Control legislation: subject gun is deemed an Assault Rifle because it features a pistol-grip stock and a bayonet lug, or some such trivia.

I probably don't understand the issue here, and I admit that I have only one side of the controversy.

You can (and should) go to the link on Mr. Completely's website and read the whole story, including the original announcement from the MD and Mr. Completely's response (essentially: if you're going to arbitrarily change the rules, I'll vote with my feet thank-you-very-much!)

Can't say that I blame Mr. Completely. He got the Bum's Rush, and if it happened to me I would also be inclined to take my football and go home.

I gotta say, I've looked at the picture and it (the grip) doesn't look particularly stable to me.

You might say that the MD is entirely justified in his decision. I don't agree, but I do remember Pete Townsend of The Who saying:

No one knows what it's like
To be the bad man
To be the sad man
Behind blue eyes

No one knows what it's like
To be hated
To be fated
To telling only lies

But my dreams
They aren't as empty
As my conscience seems to be

I have hours, only lonely
My love is vengeance
That's never free

The MD might feel this way.

No comments: