Saturday, July 06, 2013

FORD stands for Found On Road Dead!

ADVENTURE:  - the experience when someone travels far from home, where exciting and unusual events occur in a place where nobody is around to help you.

CRAPPY DAY: - see "ADVENTURE", except it happens to you.
_________________________________________________________________

Some of you may have been aware that I had planned my annual vacation for this week.  My plan was that I would leave Monday, July 1, and drive the 900 miles from my home to San Diego.  My children, and my grandchildren, live there.  This has become an annual event over the past few years and I have been looking forward to the trip for months.

It's a not-insignificant drive but I've made it before.  A 300-mile-a-day average isn't beyond reason, even though I'll be doing all the driving myself.  I had many gifts for my family members in the car, and I was eager to share their holiday with them.  Someone had suggested that I just fly down there, but the gifts included family heirlooms made of glass, and I am unwilling to subject those items to UPS, or other trans-shipment firms.   They are literally irreplaceable.

In the actual event, I got a late start on Monday the First, so I only made 100 miles the first day.   It was still daylight when I got to the area where I had made phone reservations for a motel room, and I couldn't find the hotel sign which the company representative had assured me was "visible from the hiway".

I pulled off at the Sutherlin, Oregon exit and decided to use the GPS/MAPS function of my new StupidPhone to find directions.  Unfortunately, since I'm still learning to use this device-of-the-devil, I missed a turn and had gone 4 miles past the 6.6 mile distance I had expected to travel before I decided I had made a mistake.  Obviously, I needed to backtrack, as I was traveling WEST when I intuitively knew I should be traveling NORTH.

I found a short straight stretch on the back-country road, and attempted a U-turn.

I completed the first half of the turn when my engine died.  I couldn't get it started again.  I was blocking the road in both directions .. there was no room for any vehicle to avoid me on either side of the road, and there was only 50 yards of straight travel in either direction.  In the west, there was a blind curve; in the east, there was a hill.

Fortunately, I didn't panic.  The first thing I did was to put on my emergency blinkers.  Then, noticing that there was a short 'down-slope' behind me, and the entrance to a gravel pit with room to accomodate my SUV, I managed to jump out and laboriously push my D.O.F. ("Damned Old Ford") far enough that only the first two feet of the car projected out into one lane.

THEN I paniced!

By the time all of this happened, it was already 7:30pm. Only a little over 90 minutes remained until night, and my car was black.

Fortunately, a couple of young men came by, traveling in the same direction I had came from .. toward civilization, as passes for such in this benighted country where (you can see this coming) there was no cell phone reception.  Since I could not call AAA for help, I was mightily grateful that they volunteered to help me push the D.O.F. fully off the road, and then give  me a ride back to town.

Nick and Justin were generous, responsible young men.  And I didn't say a word about their learned analysis of the probably causes of my mechanical issues.  Nor did I mention that I had experienced the same problem in May, had my car towed to the local FORD dealer, and that their mechanics were unable to diagnose the problem (and charged me $100 to tell me they don't know why it mysteriously dies).

Unknown to them, the same thing had happened to me in April, but I was in a 'safe place' when it happened.

Having been forewarned that this was a recurring problem, I had undertaken the trip with some trepidation.  My game plan was that if it happened again, I would wait until the car had cooled down sufficiently to restart, and then immediately return home.

In the actual event, I called AAA at 8:30pm (when I finally got back to a place -- Sutherlin, on the I5 Freeway-- where there were places to eat and cell phone service.  It took until 10pm until the towing service phoned me (there was some communications problems; AAA didn't tell the tow truck driver that I was in Sutherlin and my car was 10 miles West of there.  Eventually, at 10:30 the tow truck and I got to the D.O.F. at 10:30 pm, and it was another 30 minutes until he helped me find my hotel.  It was 15 miles further up the road. (When the tow truck got me to the car, it started right up!  So I asked him to lead me to my motel, which at least HE had no trouble finding.)

Note to future travelers:  the "Oakland, Oregon Motel 6" is actually located in RICE HILL, which is 10 miles north of Oakland, Oregon.  Which, in turn, is 6 miles north of Sutherlin, which is 10 miles east of where I broke down.

I'm still grumpy.  I spent Independence Day at home, alone, listening to my collegiate neighbors blowing up firecrackers and bottle rockets.  It reminded me of Viet Nam in it's intensity; now I wish I had been in a sufficiently good mood to go outside and watch the local fireworks show.  As it was, I heard the neighbors stomping on my roof as they were jostling for "the good seats".  I was not in a mood for community or conviviality, though.

After the holiday week is fully over, I'll be taking my D.O.F. back to the dealership which was unable to diagnose the problem.  I'll instruct them to start replacing fuel-system components, starting with the fuel line and up to (and including) fuel pump until I quit having these problems.

---

I've always looked upon this annual journey as an adventure.  Sometimes, though, the adventure is just too much,

I told my Daughter and Son, and their spouses, that I knew their children would be terribly disappointed that I would not get to see them this summer.

The grandchildren did not disappoint me;  they were entirely unmoved by the news that "Grandpa Won't Be With Us This Summer".

Good News:  Both Daughter and Son, and their families, will probably be moving closer (by 600 miles) to where I live, by next summer.

I'm thinking of renting hotel space for all 11 of them for next Fourth of July, and inviting them to visit ME next Fourth of July.

It would be a lot cheaper.

And a whole lot less frustrating.

Wednesday, July 03, 2013

Stoopid Computer Things!

A few days ago I decided to re-install a piece of software which I had used for (literally) years with no problems .. but had not previously installed on my recently-purchased computer.

Doesn't matter what it was .. I had full confidence.

But the links lead to an unfamiliar link.  Doesn't matter what that was, either.

The point is ... it lead me to a website named something like "download.com" and the sequence of accept/reject questions managed to sneak in a few questions which were formatted in the EXACT same way without making it clear that they were suggesting that I accept software which I had not ever heard of before.

Fool that I was, I accepted a couple of them before I realized what was going on.  And I have had nothing but problems with "pop-ups" and inadvertant sidetracks in the days since I made my unwise decisions.

So, here's a few (hopefully) helpful suggestions for you:


  • When you decide to download/install software online .. be really careful that you read EACH page of text,
  • If the test seems the same as your original "OKAY" page , it's not something that you entered incorrectly .. it's a subtly different test sequence which commits you to accepting software that you've never heard of before.
  • Any software which begins with "SWEET" or "TIDY" .. unless you have already made the fully informed decision to download that software ... should be definitively rejected!
  • You may think that anything you  download can be uninstalled using the Microsoft UNINSTALL protocols (for example).  Here's a tip:  it doesn't always completely delete/uninstall the software that you may 'suspect' is causing you problems.
  • the stuff you realize .. belatedly .. that is is f*cking up your system?  It is.  And you let it in, because you didn't pay attention to the original questions when you were trying to install a perfectly benign software package.
  • STOP!  You're ignoring this!  I am telling you, this sh*t can f*ck you up seriously .. and if you're ignoring it, you're more of a dumb-ass than I was!  (Don't say I didn't warn you!) 
  • When you try to uninstall this bogus software .. don't expect the usual Windows (?) software to deal with it.  It's sneakier than that.


WTF?

Okay, all I'm sayng is that .. I consider myself a fairly 'savvy' computer guy, but I discovered (too late) that I had been cleverly lolled into complacency because I became impatient while downloading "trusted" softwar .. and I mindlessly hit  the "accept" button because it looked to me as if the computer was slow in responding, and I was bored.

These folks are smarter than I am.  Maybe they're even smarter than you!

So, just in case: when you EVER accept an online download, do NOT do what I did!

Don't click on "ACCEPT" or even hit ENTER when you are already downloading software.  Download-dot-com may  be a legitimate website; but it only takes ONE  broken link in the admittedly  fault chain of internet access to be "dirtied" to the effect that you are sucked into giving them  information  (or access permissions) which are inappropriate. Happened to me, but I don 't think I sent out TOO much information  before I caught on to them.

No, that's not honest.  I was Totally taken by surprise, and I provided a LOT of private information before I discovered that these guys were ,,,
,,, CROOKED!

It won't help me, but it may help you if you decide to stand up to the  Corporate Greed which has led us to this juncture.

I don't believe. I just type these words;  hopefully next year when I will "BRILLIANTLY" think it out  to its logical conclusion, I can fix it.  In the meantime.. just do the best you can, okay?

  These guys are .....      

ignore all of the above text.  the person you think wrote it was a mindless bot.  we have only your best interests in mind.  we know what you need better than you do.  nothing can possibly go wrong.
nothing can go wrong. nothing can go wrong. nothing can go wrong.
nothing can go wrong. nothing can go wrong. nothing can go wrong.  nothing can go wrong. nothing can go wrong. nothing can go wrong. nothing can go wrong. nothing can go wrong. nothing can go wrong.  nothing can go wrong. nothing can go wrong. nothing can go wrong. nothing can go wrong. nothing can go wrong. nothing can go wrong.  nothing can go wrong. nothing can go wrong. nothing can go wrong. nothing can go wrong. nothing can go wrong. nothing can go wrong.  nothing can go wrong. nothing can go wrong. nothing can go wrong. nothing can go wrong. nothing can go wrong. nothing can go wrong.

Saturday, June 29, 2013

Why "Gun People" don't trust "Anti-Gun People"

Snell: Waking the dragon — How Feinstein fiddled while America burned - Iowa State Daily: Opinion:

Gun people don’t trust anti-gun people because in a single breath they tell us that the Second Amendment is irrelevant today and should be repealed because semi-automatic weapons didn’t exist when the Bill of Rights was written, then turn around and say the First Amendment protects radio, television, movies, video games, the Internet, domain names, Facebook and Twitter. Carrying liberal logic on the Second Amendment through to the First Amendment, it would only cover the town crier, and hand-operated printing presses producing only books and newspapers, and nothing else. Even anything written with a No. 2 pencil or ballpoint pen would not be included. And those of you belonging to religions that formed after the 1790s? You’re screwed under liberal logic, too.
Two Things:
First, thanks to The G-Man for pointing us at this extended article.  It is thick with links and references, and I have not yet managed to follow them all up.  As G-Man says: "this is a long article ..." -- but worth the time you might choose to spend following the thread.

Gun people don’t trust anti-gun people because, while liberals seek to expand government regulation and services — things that may not be bad or ill-intended on their own — they simultaneously try to curtail the Second Amendment. We don’t trust anti-gun people for this reason because history shows us that every genocide and democide is preceded by expansion of government power and gun control. We don’t trust anti-gunners because here in America, gun control is rooted in slavery and racism, with some of America’s modern anti-gun laws being direct copies of former Nazi laws that banned gun possession for Jews, blacks, gays and other “undesirables.”

Second: someone has done his homework; has learned how to construct an essay; has a passion for his subject matter; has determined to provide references to sources; and found an audience.

Gun people don’t trust anti-gun people because they keep saying they “respect the Second Amendment” and go on about how they respect the hunting traditions of America. We don’t trust you because you have to be a complete idiot to think the Second Amendment is about hunting. I wish people weren’t so stupid that I have to say this: The Second Amendment is about checking government tyranny. Period. End of story. The founders probably couldn’t have cared less about hunting since, you know, they just got done with that little tiff with England called the Revolutionary War right before they wrote that “little book” called the Constitution.

---

I don't know any more about the author than you do, but I'm terribly impressed.  This author has said everything I have been trying to say for the past eight years, and compressed into 3,000 words (give or take) everything I have tried to say in 10,000 word (and probably, considerably more ... and more precisely!)

Liberals always make the common plea, “We need to get some experts to solve this problem!” for any public policy issue that comes along, which is a good thing. But when it comes to the gun issue, gun expertise is completely irrelevant to the anti-gunner — people who probably have never fired a gun or even touched one in real life, and whose only experience with guns is what they’ve seen in movies or read about in bastions of (un)balanced, hyper-liberal journalism, like Mother Jones. That a pro-gun person might actually know a lot about their hobby or profession doesn’t stand up against the histrionic cries of the anti-gunner.
How can we “gun people” honestly be expected to come to the table with anti-gunners when anti-gunners are willfully stupid about guns, and openly hate, despise and ridicule those of us who own them? There must first be respect and trust — even just a little — before there can be even the beginnings of legitimate discussion of the issue.
I can't make you read this article, let alone follow the (very informative) links which the author provides.

So .. consider it a 'project'.  Go to the link and take just a few bits here and there.  I suspect that you will, as I have, take a moment to reflect on how the issues have been so dramatically skewed to fit the Liberal psychology and bias, in the referenced links.

For only one example: Rev, Al Sharpton et al

Published on Jan 9, 2013

VP Joe Biden To Meet With NRA Gun-NUTS

 
Connecticut Massacre & How Right-Wing 'Gun-NUTs' Have Twisted The 2nd Amendment



Thursday, June 27, 2013

First Day On The Job; Vietnam, 1969

Y'know how your first day on a new job is suppose to be a sort of  'breaking in' experience?   Somebody welcomes you at the door, shows you around the workplace, introduces you to your co-workers.   Maybe you take a coffee break with them, to kind of establish the first blush of an interpersonal bond.   Probably the Boss takes you into his office and tells you what to expect, and just were you fit in.

September 29, 1969:   First Infantry Division Base Camp at Dian, Republic of Vietnam

I had been in country for a week, during which time I went through In-processing  and assigned to the First Division.  We had a day in the repo-depot first ("replacement depot"), where we were 'housed' in crude buildings and slept on cots with springs but no mattresses no mattresses. We were given one pair of jungle fatigues, one pair of boots, and a helmet.  No underwear except for an Olive Drab T0shirt; nobody wore underpants in Viet Nam because of the heat and the humidity..  We also received 'back pay' ... I was issued $355 ... in five dollar bills.  I walked around with this wad in my pocket until I was assigned to a Company, when it went into the Company Safe by the First Sgt.

We went through a two-day "refresher" training where, since we were Infantry, we did "Patrol Exercises".  Nobody was issued ammunition, although we had M-16 rifles.

At Day Six, I was told I would join my platoon (Third platoon, or "Third Herd") of Lima Company 1st of the 16th, the next day. I would be picked up by the resupply helicopter at 0900, but I would be given ammunition by the Executive Officer at 0800.  Also .. magazine carriers, "Light combat" (LC or 'Alice') butt-pack and webgear, etc. would be issued an hour before the liftoff.

Sure enough the helicopter was at the appointed place at the appointed time, and so was I.  I had my ten magazines (loaded to 18 rounds hardball each) three canteens of luke-warm water, harness, aid kit (a bandage suitable for wrapping around my chest in case I suffered a "sucking chest wound").  They didn't issue me my claymore mine, but we all carried one as a rule.  Oh, and no insignia was to show unless it was 'demure', which means it was black and nobody could tell your rank unless they were close enough to touch you.

This was the big day, I was finally out of school forever.  I climbed aboard the Uh-1 "Huey" helicopter, capable of carrying 6 combat-loaded infantry men.  There was me, and a stack of C-rations four feet high, wide and deep.  Plus about a dozen 5-gallon disposable plastic jugs of water.

Plus the pilot, co-pilot, and crew-chief/door-gunner with his bungie-cord-mounted M-60 .30 caliber machine gun.
--
That was when I  discovered the Thrill of Flying!  It was great!  When you're 1,000 feet high, the heat and the humidity don't matter.  Both side-doors were open and for the first time since the 737 jet had landed at the airport in Saigon, I wasn't sweating and the air didn't smell of rotten lettuce!

_______________________

INSERTION:

20 minutes later we landed in what I later learned had been a "hot LZ".  The Landing Zone was under fire from VC troops (or NVA ... who knew who was shooting at us?  I rarely knew that much about the enemy unless we were close enough to actually see them) and all the Crew Chief had to say was:

"OUT!  OUT!  OUT OF THE CHOPPER NOW!   But first, grab a couple of C-cases 'cause we're dumping our load right here right now!"


So I slung my rifle, and with a case of C's under each arm (same size and weigh of a case of Budweiser Beer, I discovered: I can do this!) I jumped the four feet from the deck of the chopper to the floor of the small clearing which was --- soggy.  I sank up to my ankles in muck, stumbled, dropped the C's, planted my face in the ground in the Front Leaning Rest Position.


Welcome to The Real Viet Nam.

Nobody picked me up, but they surely picked up the C's.   I later learned that this was all the food that a full platoon had available to eat for the next two or three days.  They had their priorities, and a FNG  (F*cking New Guy .. even if he was a Staff Sergeant and a potential Platoon Sergeant) was not among the things they cared about.

That was Lesson 1.
___________________________

DURATION:
SOMEBODY came around and mentioned quickly that they were taking fire from the woodline across the way (an open area) and that they were going to be picked up in 10 minutes to be re-inserted in another area.  For general information, they would NOT break down (distribute) the food now; they would carry it individually to the next LZ.

I got the impression that their priorities were:
  1. Get the hell out of here
  2. save the food
  3. make sure everyone got on their assigned chopper
  4. leave nobody .. even the FNG .. behind
I found some comfort there, even though I had no idea what was going on.

In fact, the first Eagle Flight (five helicopters each) had already left, carrying the Platoon Leader (Lieutenant Commanding), Radio Operators for all 3 squads, and most of the men before Specialist 4 Somebody told me what was going on.

There was an unknown force of unknown force of unknown size "plinking at us" from the treeline across the open area .. I already had figured out that the 'open area' was tall grass in a bog .. nobody could cross it in an assault, but it provided good visual acquisition of any targets who were so stupid as to stand out in the open.

Unfortunately, the only place where the helicopters could land to pick up our troops was at the verge, where the bog wasn't so deep.  The choppers couldn't actually LAND, of course, but they could hover "real close" to the ground.  Comforting thought, that, and it explained my face-plant when I jumped out of the chopper a few minutes ago.

Has it only been ten minutes?  And why isn't anyone shooting at us now?  There are still a dozen troops here .. the army will have to send at least two more choppers to complete the extraction.

The Nameless Spec4  (Specialist Fourth Class .. what the Marines would call a Lance Corporal) I had been talking to explained it to me.

"They're waiting for the helicopters to come back.  They know we're here, and they know we're not going to stay.  here, so when the choppers pick us up they'll unload with everything they've got as soon as we load onto the birds.  That's when the bad shit starts."

He had an idea, though, and he had  an M-72 Rocket Anti-Tank Missile (disposable).  Actually, that's the American version of the RPG (Rocket Propelled Grenade) ... reasonably accurate up to 400 yards (yeah, right!) and although it is an Armor Piercing Missile, if it hits a tree trunk it could conceivably be considered an "area weapon".  His plan was that as soon as the choppers hit 'hover', he would fire the M-72 into the opposing woodline.  That should disconcert (not his word) the opposition (not his word either) long enough for us to board and lift off.

Damn!  He was the ugliest man I had ever seen, but he was at that moment the smartest man I had ever met.  I agreed with his plan, and when the final 2 choppers came in for the pickup, I told him to pick his time and do his stuff.  It barely crossed my mind that I had the rank and the training, but he had the smarts and whatever he suggested I would agree to.

LESSON 2
________________________________

Extraction:
So the choppers came in, started their landing (they had to hover first because we were in the trees and they were in the open), and Spec4 Ugly launched his rocket against the treeline.

WHAM!

I made sure he carried the empty M-72 tube ("Charley" could use it for a mortar, or a booby trap) but we hopped onto the chopper and I swear we walked across the water getting to the PZ (Pickup Zone)!

Later, we learned that the first Eagle Flight had taken fire; the bird that the LT, his radioman, his platoon medic and his closest people were on had several AK-47 strikes against the floor of the chopper, but nobody was injured and the bird wasn't injured.





We received NO incoming fire during our extraction, as nearly as I could tell.  The Crew Chief was working the woodline with his M60, and we had a couple of attack choppers providing covering fire.  Well, we may have been shot out, but we weren't hit and nobody bled; that's good enough news for any hot extraction.
 _________________________________________________

The SOI in the Swamp:
Five minutes or an hour later (I was still on some kind of adrenalin rush, my sense of time was short-circuited so I have no idea how much time had elapsed) we were the last pair of choppers to put down in our new Area of Operations.  I never learned why we were sent there.

We disembarked on what turned out to be the wrong side of a swamp.  It was essentially open water (as opposed to the grassy bog which had been my first real introduction to Viet Nam terrain), but the place where we put boots on the ground was relatively high and dry.

The first order of business was to distribute the C-rations and the water.   Everybody took enough C-rats to last them for the next two days (six rats, 3 per day) and there was some squabbling about who got which of their favorite foods.  I later learned that this was typical; the first thing you do is grab food and disperse.  Later, you can horse-trade, but it gives you a stronger 'trading position' if you can get your favorites first.  Second priority .. get something you know somebody else wants; you can always jerk him around and end up with better food.

Then the Platoon Leader, Lieutenant Maverick, sought me out and introduced himself to me.  I am using mostly nom de'gueres here; not to protect them but because it was 40 years ago and I don't remember everyone's names.  He had been an E6 Staff Sgt, but went to OCS for his commission.  They call this transition from NCO to Officer a "MAVERICK", so that works for me.

He told me that they were going to distribute their resupply, burn the excess, then move east across the northern edge of what was called "The Heart Shaped Woods".

This was a notorious VC/NVA  sanctuary.  It was all low brush ... mostly less than 6' high but very dense.  It was guarded by booby traps and ambushes at all times.  We were looking for trails, and for VC/NVA hunting parties who were looking for game or other food sources to feed the majority of the units which were known to be hiding there.
_____________________________

SOI:
There was one problem, which escalated to another.

First, we had to cross a large, wide (if shallow) swamp to get to the Heart Shaped Woods.  It was only knee-deep, but had a soft silty bottom and footing was tricky.  We crossed it single-file, widely separated so as to offer the smallest possible number of targets in what was, essentially, an open area.

Unfortunately, the Platoon Kilo (Radio Man), slipped and fell into the water.  He struggled back to his feet and completed the crossing, but a few minutes later he discovered that he had lost his "S.O.I."


The SOI (Strategic Operating Index, if I recall it correctly) was his Radio Code Book.  It had all the daily codes for the entire Division in it, and it was classified TOP SECRET!



We needed to have it, almost as much as we need Charley to NOT have it!
  1.  Each page was a daily "one time" code, upon which all of our radio transmissions would be based.   Without it we could not be confident that our transmissions would be 'transparent' to Charley.
  2. If we couldn't recover it, we would have to resort to 'ad hoc' obfuscations, such as "we are 3 clicks north of the blue line, and 1 click west of the red line'.  "Blue line" is a water source, such as a river, and usually the most prominent terrain feature on the map we were currently using .. designated by a six-digit code.  "Red line" was a road, usually the main road on the same map.  Unfortunately, Charley had maps, too, and he could usually tell the general area from our transmission strength, so this was exceedingly poor security.  We obviously did not want the enemy to know our location, even in general terms (within 1000 meters).
  3. If Charley found the SOI (code book), he would have the codes for EVERY transmission in the Division for the rest of the month. 
So ... most of the platoon spent the next x-minutes (20?) wading through the swamp, looking for the SOI.

We never found it.  Instead, the LT decided that it was too dangerous for us to linger in a known insertion LZ, and we should move out.  Besides, if we couldn't find the SOI .. by the time Charley found it, it would be too soggy to be readable.  He checked with "higher" (ie: Division Command) and received permission to 'combat loss' the SOI.  Bonuse: we would be extracted before nightfall, and a new emergency SOI would be issued "soon".  ( I doubt that ever happened, but it could have.)

So, we performed three actions before we moved out to check the perimeter of The Heart Shaped Woods":
  1. We distributed the water, and the C-rations; we could move farther, faster, when we had no load other than what we carried in our Alice Butt-Packs.  (I knew by then just how much it slowed a man down to carry a case of C-rations ... and you were NOT combat-ready in that configuraion!)  LESSON 3
  2. We dug a hole, and put all the leftovers in there, and lit them on fire.  This includes the used PRC-25 (Personal Radio Combat/Model 25) batteries; they got hot and blew up which along with the general fire helped keep the left-behinds from becoming assets to the enemy.  They LOVED our C-rations!
  3. We designated a 'rear guard', a small (3-man) detachment to watch our back trail.  They could see if Charley sneaked in to steal our left-overs, and fire him up.  They could tell if Charley was searching the bog for the lost SOI.  And finally, they could tell if Charley was following us on our patrol.
We heard the Batteries blow up as we worked our way away from the swamp.  Twenty minutes later, after the fire in the disposal pit had died out, our rear guard caught up with us.  They saw nothing, they saw nobody. On the other hand, who knows how long they really stayed that far behind us?  It's possible that they may have waited only a few minutes before they started following us.  I never knew; I never asked.
____________________________

Oh-Oh:
I was assigned (informally) a position halfway down the single-file line of our platoon.  I couldn't see the Platoon Leader near the head of the line; I couldn't see the rear element.  I was was the Senior NCO in the platoon at the moment, but I had not been designated the Platoon Sergeant.  I was still a "FNG"  (F*cking New Guy), and  I was learning quickly things that they had NEVER told us in NCO School.

My DTQ  ("Daily Terror Quotient") was humming around between 40% and 80%;  I was scared all the time, but not enough to panic and just enough to keep me from becoming complaisant.

Being a FNG, I didn't realize it at the time; but it was turning out to be a pretty good day.

Then it got worse.

"Uh .. Sarge?"

This was the guy walking behind me.  His name was Tennesee, and he was a 6'5" blonde from Tennesee who carried a Tennessee Toothpick and an M-60 Machine Gun.  (Note to myself:  I have GOT to get some knives over here!)  Have I mentioned he was from Tennessee?  He never let us forget it!

I stopped, turned around, and he had this most odd expression on his face.  Consternation, embarrassment, apology, and the reek of fear.

"Yeah, what?"  (I wasn't in a mood for conversation; don't know why, since I had only been shot at deliberately for the first time in my life ...

"Uh ... Sarge?  I think I'm hung up here.  I think I'm standing on a Booby Trap.  Can you fix it?  What do I do now?"


"DO NOT MOVE!  KEEP YOUR FOOT RIGHT WHERE IT IS NOW!"






Okay, so I called (softly) for the folks ahead to pass the word; stop now, and send the platoon leader back down the line now!

The LT comes down the line.  He wasn't chewing tobacco, but he should have been.

"Yep, that's a booby trap.  Probably two or three hand grenades, with wire between the rings holding the pins in.  If he moves, it's gonna blow up sure as shit.  Sarge, you may want to move your folks back a ways?  And someone send for my  Chu Hoi, okay?"

I'm channeling the theme from "JAWS", and Spielberg hadn't even made the movie yet.

The term "Chu Hoi" is vietnamese.  It's an "I Surrender!" phrase.  Ex-Viet Cong who are captured are given the choice to be re-educated or to suffer lesser punishment; I think there's a "firing squad" option in there somewhere, but actually they get more food and less political bullshit than they did from the VC, so Chu Hoi's tend to make pretty good assets.  They call them "Tiger Scouts" and they get special camouflage uniforms.

And they know all about booby traps.  Lord knows they've set enough of them.

So this Chu Hoi (which is NOT a derisive term!) comes wandering down with a toothpick hanging over  his lips and says "yep, booby trip.  I fix."

I took it upon myself to direct the rest of the platoon to "form a permeter, at least 20 meters radius" (American Hand Grenades have a 5 meter "kill zone") and 'get down'.  Best order I ever gave; everybody obeyed it immediately .. except for Tennesee, of course.

The Chu How knelt down beside Tennessee, and said: "don't move until I tell you".  Good advice.

The "device"  (it would be called an IED, or Improvised Explosive Device in today's terms) featured 3 hand grenades .. American, who knows where they got them ... mostly buried in the ground' their top part was above ground, the rings were above ground.  There were thin wires between the three rings, and the pins were straightened, which means that it was very easy to pull the pins by pulling the wires.

The wires were very slack; they stood up above the top of the grenades, so it was easy to hook on to them with your foot if you happened to be using the most obvious path and were experienced enough that you SLID your foot instead of picking it up and laying it down.  (*I was so green, I hadn't yet learned yet how to walk in the jungle.)*

Tennessee's shoe-laces on his boots were all jammed up in the wires.  it took some doing, but the Chu Hoi managed to untangle the wires and the laces, and softly talk Tennessee into moving his foot back, and out of the entanglement.

Finally, the machine-gunner was free of the wires.    We didn't bother to try to recover the booby trap; we just put a Claymore mine right beside it, and detonated the entire array with a 50' wire which command-detonated the 'mine'.  All three devices flew up, after we were hunkered down in a safe position  at a safe distance.  Well, except for the Chu Hoi .. he was given the "clacker" which initiated the device; he was still proving his reliability, this was a part of his initiation process.

Frankly, the whole rest of the day was a fog.  I have no idea what happened after the booby trap was demolished.  And I don't much care, 'cause it was much of a nothing.  We set up an ambush on the booby trap site, but nobody came to check it out.

I learned from that;  if you set up a booby trap, and it blows up ... you stay away from it until "The Other Guys" have a chance to clear the area.  They're gong to be pissed.

Of course .. you set up a secondary booby-trap, just to catch them.

But that's another story.
______________________________

I was glad when my First Day On The Job Ended.  I figured .. that's going to be my worst day on the job.

I was wrong, of course.

And .. I still only knew the names of four people:  SP4, Tennessee, LT, and Chu Hoi,

I would learn the rest of them eventually.
It didn't help much, though; especially when they started dying.

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Mistrial in NV ex-prostitute's hammer attack after juror sends text messages to lawyer | Fox News

Mistrial in NV ex-prostitute's hammer attack after juror sends text messages to lawyer | Fox News: ELKO, Nev. –

An ex-prostitute accused of attacking a co-worker with a claw hammer in a dispute over missing beer at a rural Nevada brothel will be retried on an attempted murder charge after a judge declared a mistrial because a juror sent text messages to a public defender about the jury, prosecutors said Friday. Elko County Deputy District Attorney Mark Mills told The Associated Press on Friday that "numerous jurors" disregarded the court's warning to not discuss the trial while the case was ongoing. One juror texted a public defender Wednesday night about two other jurors talking about — among other things — the ethnicity of the victim, Sang Fowler, who suffered severe injuries to her head and hand in the beating at Sharon's Bar and Brothel in Carlin about 25 miles west of Elko last August. Elko County District Judge Al Kacin acknowledged the case is full of "salacious details" before declaring the mistrial on Thursday and ordering Lisa Wong, 50, back to the county jail, according to the Elko Daily Free Press (http://tinyurl.com/mqp37mn ). "It's the type of case that gets the tongue wagging," Kacin said''
 You think?

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Evil Lighters in the Jungle; Viet Nam, 1969

Yeah, though I walk through the Valley of the Shadow of Death, I shall fear no evil; for I am the evilest  son-of-a-bitch in the Valley.

There was a time in my life when men I knew bought Zippo lighters specifically to have those words engraved on it.

That was a very long time ago.

I haven't actually known many truly evil men.  A few, not many.  they had no need for engravings; what they did defined them, and that was enough for them.

Those with engraved cigarette lighters were usually frightened men, whistling in the graveyard, seeking to create their courage by assuming the trappings of "toughness".  In their essential innocence, they thought that being "tough" somehow equated to being 'strong".

These are not both physical attributes.  Strong is muscular; tough is -- mental.  Emotional, attitudinal.  Strong can be beaten;  Tough can only be killed.

("Cool Hand Luke:" was tough.  He did not win, but he was never beaten.  "Beat Up" .. yes.)


I liked those lighters.  They held a lot of lighter fluid, and they would burn forever.

 But they would leak in your pocket, and the fluid would burn the skin on your thigh, leaving a tender red patch which the rough cotton of your utility trousers would abrade as you crept through the jungle.  Life was shitty enough in those days, without wounding yourself.

"Get a good wound", they would say;   "Nothing crippling for life .. just enough for a ticket home."

Zippo Burn didn't qualify.  It was just a pain in the ass.  *(Well, no .. we didn't carry our lighters in our hip pockets.)*\


A lighter-fluid burn wasn't enough for a ticket home.  Neither was "Bamboo Poisoning", which I did get. It was merely inconvenient and uncomfortable -- unless you left it untreated so long that it became necrotic.    (Is that the term?  It's like Gangrene; infection sets in, and if left untreated the tissue literally rots in place.)  It took seven years AFTER I returned from Viet Nam for the lesions to completely heal and disappear.


Whatever the word is for "they  cut off your leg to save your life", that's the word.  I never did lose a limb, but I DID spend a couple of weeks, back in the Division Base Camp, being treated.     The medics back there in the Rear with the Gear scrubbed the dead tissue out of the lesions on my hands, arms, legs and feet with a rough, no-nonsense, efficient energy.   It took about an hour after the company Executive Officer spotted  me with my pant-legs rolled up at Pay call in the NDP ("Night Defensive Position" ... call it a Base Camp) for him to send me back to First Infantry Division Headquarters in Dian, where I immediately reported to the First Aid Depot.  They were using Hexaclorophene ... you know, that stuff that the workers in the early pizza parlors used to keep their hands clean, until the Surgeon General declared that it caused cancer?  Well, it cleaned me up pretty good, and it didn't kill me.  So I guess short-term usage was okay.

I had to scrub the dead flesh out of my sores three times a day for the period of my "Profile", which is like "doctor says the Sergeant  must keep his pants legs rolled up and wear shower shoes until further notice, and stay out of 'the field', so he can heal".  I didn't like the scrubbing ... hurts like a sonofabitch .. but I did like walking around a military base in a combat zone wearing shorts and sandals.  Field-grade officers quail at the sight of a Profile!  It's a God-like effect; you probably had to be there to appreciate the power it gave to a lowly Staff Sgt.

And there I was, in the Division Base Camp.  I wasn't allowed to keep a weapon.  But I was being guarded by a perimeter of armed soldiers too incompetent to be trusted with loaded weapons in the field, and/or too doped up on grass and narcotics (usually supplied at low prices by Vietnamese 'friendlies') to know when their shift was over.   They just slept in their bunkers and pooped in their pants.

Who says I missed out on the Sixties?

Division Base Camp, in Dian, Vietnam.  First Infantry Division.  The "Big Red One".  I loved that division.  I still have a couple of shoulder patches, a pin, and a coffee mug.

Call "Dian" (pronounced "ziahn") a village on the outskirts of Saigon.  Or call it what it was, an ulcer on the face of the earth.  Every semi-permanent Military Encampment deserves that description.  Did you know that when you had to piss, they had a military solution?  They called it a "Pissoir", after the french word for "pisser".  What it was, was .. they dug a hole in the ground, put a 4-foot long section of 6" sewer pipe in it, and then filled both the hole and the pipe with pea-gravel.  You stand in front of it, pulled out your Johnson, and pissed in the pipe.  Hence the name.

The really classy bases preserved your dignity; they hid your nether regions by putting a semi-circle of the corrugated sheet-metal around one side of the pissoir.  It kept the vietnamese civilian employees ("Bunker Babes") from being exposed to your exposure.  Big deal, they were almost all men, trollops, or old women ... with significant leakage between the three definitions.  Enough to say, they had all seen enough of American Pricks that one more was not cause for concern.  And yes, they had seen a lot of American Penises, too.

Most of the bases didn't bother with the crotch-screening measures.  And when  we showered, the civilian women workers were always present.  We decided to consider this a gift from God for them.

The alternative choice was to never pee.  That didn't last very long, individually or institutionally.

_______________________________________________________

But I digress.

Back to the Cigarette lighter.  And the necrotic flesh/bamboo poisoning:



Self abrading my tortured flesh three times a day, with a terry-cloth towel to scrub out the dead flesh?  That hurt a LOT more than those leaky Zippo Lighters did.  But I still carried a lighter.\

I admit, I did buy one of those lighters and I did have it etched with some pithy saying (darned if I remember what it said, but it was irreverent even though it didn't mention no stinking "Valley of Death"), but I didn't have it for long.


Someone stole it.

Over a period of time, someone stole everything I owned.

I'll get back to that in a few minutes.
No, I won't.   Suffice it to say that the REMFs  (Rear Echelong Mother F*ckers" were predators, and would steal anything  that we left in their keeping.  Their thought was that we were going to die anyway, so why not steal from us BEFORE we understood that we were dead?

You cannot fault their logic, but it pissed me off at the time.
Come to think of it, it still pisses me off!
I understand it, but I don't have any respect for the opportunistic MF's!

___________________

While I didn't  have a Zippo after the first one, I used a tiny little lighter the size of my thumbnails, which didn't hold much fluid but what it held, it did not leak.

I took that lighter off the body of an NVA (North Vietnamese Army) soldier who suddenly had no further use for it.  He wasn't going to be lighting any more cigarettes; he was living .. okay, not living ... proof that Lung cancer isn't the only thing that will kill you;  your political persuasion will do just fine, thank you, if you pursue it to the logical conclusion of fighting for your beliefs.  He was, instead, a testimonial to the motto that "Artillery Lends Dignity To What Would Otherwise Be An Unseemly Brawl".

[Actually, the Third Field Artillery Regiment motto is "Celeritis Et Accuratio" (Speed and Accuracy .. sound familiar?)  But we all really know what those red-striped trouser-legs REALLY think, don't we?  Eh?  Those Inglorious Bastards!  They kept firing on MY position for all the time I was in the field.  But that is a topic for a future post, so I'll let it be for now.]
Back to the body of the NVA private who had this cute little lighter on a string ... I kid you not.

I stole from him shamelessly.  He didn't need his web-belt with the red-star buckle or his "Ho Chi Minh" Sandals (made from the tread of a truck tire, and straps made from its inner-tube).  I left him his pith helmet .. his face was pretty much all f*cked up, and he looked better with his helmet over his face than off.  Besides, it was gruesome; I had enough nightmares to keep me awake for decades.

And I was in a hurry.  Clueless people were still shooting.  My men were bunkered up, but The Bad Guys didn't know that, and someone had forgotten to declare a "Cease Fire, You Guys Lost!"
 moment.

 Oh, and we were still receiving  Friendly Fire from our own artillery ...  a fist-sized chunk of shrapnel hit [SPLAT!!!] in the mud six inches from my right boot heel ... enough cutting-edges in that flash-frozen hunk of metal to flay a thousand fish, and its impact sort of distracted me for a day or a week or a lifetime.  It was scald-your-hand hot when I picked up, and I thought for a while about keeping it as a souvenir, but it was too heavy to pack around when the alternative was to dump water, ammo, or "shrapnel'.

"Shrapnel" lost,  as a candidate for a "souvenir"; as it always does .. and should.

["Shrapnel" is a technical term, not referring to the shell casing of Artillary, but purpose-built devices, which include the current and latest American Hand Grenades.  But that's the subject of a future article.]

Getting back to the original point ....

I took the lighter off a dead NVA Soldier ... to the Victor go the spoils.  Remember that .. I'll come back to it.

I was never evil, and I was never tough.  LUCKY, perhaps ... nothing said "God Loves You, My Son" as convincingly as being shot at .. repeatedly .. and always missed.  Thank you Jesus, for putting crappy sights on an AK and scared boys behind them!

Unfortunately,, U. S. Artillarymen are much better shots than NVA or VC  grunts.  Even after all these years, I've not been able to count the number of times I've been pelted with "Shrapnel" from American Artillery.  (Or bombs .. ask me some time about the 2000 pound bombs from "Arc Lightning" ... B52 .. bombing strikes! Or don't, thank you.)

Ahhh .. I could tell you stories about close calls, and perhaps later I will.  it takes me longer than it use to, to get into the "story telling" mode.  usually it was "Pre-Emptive Bombing" or "Supportive Artillery" that ended up with shrapnel in our web gear, or our backpacks (or smashing into the ground all around us) with no greater effect than scaring the ever-loving CRAP out of us!


(One more page of the memoirs, and then I'll have it all out of my system.  Please bear with me tonite.)

"Usually we caught shrapnel (not the correct name) when we were operating as a "small unit", detached, at night.  That would be one or two squads .. less than a full platoon, call it 20 men ... going where they sent us because "RADAR REPORTED POSSIBLE ENEMY MOVEMENT IN THIS AREA!







A word about Ground Radar: 
                                   Faulty.







We often received radio warnings about "unidentified/ potentially enemy images in your immediate area, moving toward your position".

We were there, we never saw them, but "Higher Authority" invariably decided to "defend (our) tactical position" by calling in Artillery Strikes on our position.  We caught hell, and a lot of Heavy Metal ... and we never were able to convince them to NOT shell us.

Perhaps it's significant that none of my troops, in the dozen or so instances when we received Heavy Metal from Artillery or Bombings ... were hurt ... implies something about the efficacy of Artillary?

Or maybe they were just hitting far away from us to save us?

Interesting, if so, because at least twice we later determined that they were reading OUR position  (our people) as the target .. they thought we were VC. Oh gee, that policy of using black instead of brass insignia isn't working for us?  [snide alert]

Getting Down To The Wire

Frankly, as far as Artillery Barrages and Bomb Runs were concerned?
I would just as soon have declined the honor.

The attention was  flattering, but the consequences were painful, and upsetting.  That American Military Command apparently considered us to be a threat  (they shelled us much more frequently than they ever shelled true-identified units of the VC)  was much more than the Viet Cong had done;  they  (VC) found us laughable, and apparently decided that their best response was to let us alone (with occasional sniper-shots to keep us on edge). We were no threat to them; they were no threat to us.  We all , however, feared American Artillery (and with good reason!)

SUMMARY:
We in The Field always figured it (artillery) was inevitable when unexpected, and unavailable when needed.  They (American Artillery, lending dignity to this unruly squabble) were busy blowing the everlasting crap out of some OTHER unspecting (American Infantry squad) target in the Area of Operations (AO).

Which is to say .. it simply wasn't OUR turn in the barrel.

Maybe tomorrow night, maybe not

Good night, sleep well, and if perchance to dream of small pieces of iron raining down on your night defensive position ...

....  Oops!  Sorry 'bout that!

Monday, June 24, 2013

Oh, please!

Madonna Stands up for Gun Rights? - Leah Barkoukis:

It’s rare to hear someone in the Hollywood scene speak the truth about guns, but that’s exactly what Madonna did in a recent interview with ABC News’ Elizabeth Vargas. 
When asked about the choice of choreography in her current tour, which drew criticism because of the first act’s heavy use of guns, the pop icon said she would have never left that part out. 
 "That would be like asking people to not have guns in action movies," she said. "I mean the thing is, guns don't kill people, people kill people. That whole first section of the show is like an action movie, and I was playing a super vixen who wanted revenge." 
Madonna even gave a statement that she does not condone violence, and that her work is art and nothing more. 
 "But I know there was several movies that delayed release because of the shootings, for example, at Sandy Hook Elementary school," Vargas said. 
"Well that's not going to change the situation," Madonna replied. "This all comes from fear and ignorance, and people not really raising their children, or not paying attention to what's going on."

Celebrity  "support" can be So detrimental for a societal or political issue!

Here, the aging "Like A Virgin" Celebrity hitches her star to the "Second Amendment" cause, about which she obviously has no affinity.  If she really cared about that issue, she would have spoken out sooner, and not in support of her own lame and dying career.

It's not even Christmas, but if I had one wish it would be that Celerity Activism would NOT muddy the waters on an issue which I consider important.

I feel embarrassed to even acknowledge  her publicity release,  except that it provided the opportunity to excoriate her ignorant self-seeking public contribution.

Friday, June 21, 2013

California finds "Perfect Storm" to drown the Second Amendment

Gun control: Cartridge ID law to take effect

Patent expires, clearing hurdle for micro-stamping technology - NRA threatens to sue


Gun control: Cartridge ID law to take effect - San Francisco Chronicle: May 18, 2013


A hotly contested gun-control law that was passed in 2007 is finally ready to be implemented, Attorney General Kamala Harris said Friday: a requirement that every new semiautomatic handgun contain "micro-stamping" technology that would allow police to trace a weapon from cartridges found at a crime scene. 
 The law, signed by then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, made California the first state to require micro-stamping, which engraves the gun's serial number on each cartridge. But the legislation specified that it would take effect only when the technology was available and all private patents had expired. 
 The gun owners' group Calguns Foundation tried to forestall the law at one point by paying a $555 fee in an attempt to extend a patent held by the inventor, who wanted it to lapse. Gun manufacturers said the technology was expensive and ineffective, and a National Rifle Association lawyer has threatened a lawsuit.
 But at a Los Angeles news conference Friday, Harris announced that micro-stamping had cleared all technological and patenting hurdles and would be required on newly sold semiautomatics, effective immediately.
 From February through July, 2008, COGITO ERGO GEEK presented a series of articles which explored the Wonderland Imaginations of "inventor" and NRA member Todd Lizotte.

(In December, 2008, I presented a summary article comparing "Microstamping" with "Encoded Ammunition" ... both proposals were dismissed as being fiscally impossible, and unreliable in terms of their stated purpose: to identify the firearm responsible for criminal assault based on 'indicia microstamped on the shell casing'.   For the full patent application, see the patent application:
"Method and apparatus for reading firearm microstamping - US 7111423 B2")

Essentially,  Lizotte envisioned a 'minor change in the production process' where-in unique identification information would be embossed on either the firing pin or the breech-face of a firearm.  (Which part of the firearm would stamp the code on what part of the cartridge case seems to be subject to interpretation; both alternatives are problematic but the current understanding seems to suggest that the FIRING PIN would stamp unique identifying numbers on the PRIMER."

MICRO-STAMPING ON THE PRIMER:


MICRO-STAMPING ON THE CARTRIDGE BASE:




In 2007, "Arnold, the Governator" actually got the California State Assembly (?) to pass a bill requiring that this technology be included in every semautomatic firearm sold in California.  There was one provisio, however, which addressed Inventor Lizzotte's patent.  Since the inventor stood to make millions in patent rights, the law would not come into effect until the patent had expired.

The patent has now expired.  Lizotte, for his sins, stands to make no more than 'chump change' from his Grand Idea ... if that.  As a consequence, the California law is automatically enacted.

California has found the perfect end-run on the Second Amendment.

Citizens on California will no longer be able to buy new semi-automatic pistols at 'reasonable prices', which hurts all but the most affluent of Californians. 

Yes, this law is directly targeted to discomfort all but the very rich.

PRODUCTION NOTES: INTERCHANGEABLE PARTS

Henry Ford became one of the richest men in America early in the 20th Century when he proved the benefits of Mass Production.  Make every part identical to every other part, and assemblers may build the most complex machinery by just dipping a hand into a bucket of each part.  The parts are all made to the same specification, so they will all fit perfectly.

Before, machines were made mostly by hand, with each part hand-fitted (filed until it fit) to match the abutting parts.  This was hand-labor, and Ford successfully replaced it with machine-labor.

Lizotte's brainstorm, however, takes us back to the cottage industry era where 'some' individual parts must legally be matched with 'other' individual parts.  In this case, there are two alternatives of unique parts which must match.

FIRST UNIQUE PART:
The Serial Number of each firearm is typically stamped, embossed or engraved on the receiver of each firearm.  In a pistol, that is the Frame.  All other parts may be replaced without need for registration or AFT tracking, but The Frame is The Gun.

Until this time, both manufacturers and repairmen (gunsmiths) could interchange any other individual parts with the Frame, and it would remain the same firearm.

SECOND UNIQUE PART:
With the new California, there is another Unique Part:  Depending on the wording of the law, either the Firing Pin or the Breach Block (eg: the breech face of the slide, in most semi-automatic pistols) must be be constructed so that when the firearm is fired, the unique coding number is impressed by the force of recoil on some part of the cartridge.   That is to say, the unique code is MICROSTAMPED on the cartridge.

For the sake of discussion, let us assume that the unique code is part of the firing pin, rather than the breech face of the slide.

When the pistol is fired, the slide retracts and at the same time the initial striking force of the firing pin is magnified by the action/reaction effect.  This provides sufficient energy to emboss that code on the firing pin.  The cartridge is ejected, and if it is left at the scene of a crime it may be examined to determine the make, model and serial number of the pistol which fired it.

This information would allow Crime Scene Investigators to access a DataBase which matches each unique identifier ... that information may not actually be embossed on the cartridge primer ... which would lead to federal records identifying the original purchaser of the firearm.   Which, logically, would identify the perpetrator of the crime.  This is the "Logic of Lizzotte".

Alternatively, if the unique identifier were engraved on the breech face of the slide, then the unique identifier would be embossed (micro-stamped) on the base of the cartridge, with essentially the same effect; it would be possible to identify the firearm which ejected the cartridge, and therefore to track the owner of the firearm.

PROBLEMS WITH THE LOGIC:

  1. If the firing pin or the slide must match the serial number of the frame, then that second part must also become an inventory item; it must be recorded.
  2. If the recorded part must be hand-fitted to the frame, it can no longer be randomly plucked from a bucket of identical parts.  This takes the manufacturing process from the "interchangeable parts" process of modern industry to the "hand fitted" cottage industry of the 19th century ... and that is very, very expensive.
  3. Firearms, like all machinery, are subject to wear and destruction during their usage.   If a slide or a firing pin must be replaced, it is currently a relatively minor process easily performed by any competent gunsmith -- or often by the gun-owner at a relatively small cost.  However, if the replacement part must contain the micro-stamping element, each part must be individually made.  Firing pins are a few dollars each; slides are several hundred dollars each.
  4. Matching the encoding on a serialized frame requires special and unique manufacturing processes.  It also requires governmental oversight to ensure that the replacement part encoding matches the serial number on the frame.  This is, again, "cottage industry" processing.
  5. The government must provide oversight to ensure that the parts match.  It must also maintain a registry of original parts, plus replacement parts, along with a mechanism for tracking.  This is tantamount to registration.  It is also very expensive.
  6. Parts might be available from foreign sources, which are not required to accommodate the laws of a single state, or those of a single country.  It would be easy to buy these parts.  Yes, they would be more expensive (market demand) but less expensive than those which are controlled by the government.
  7. Skipping the next two or more logical objections;  this is a concept which has so many procedural loop-holes that it would be impossible to control the production, importation and replacement of parts which are suppose to be damaged or broken.
Honest people might try to accommodate the legal requirements, but it would be a hugely expensive process in terms of time, effort and money.  Dishonest people would find a way around it: file off  or fill the Micro-Stamping on the firing pin, or the slide breech face; find parts which do not carry the Micro-Stamping features.

In fact, in sheer frustration, even honest people would be inclined to substitute (for example) a $3 firing pin of no pedigree whatever for a $300 firing pin with the legally required Micro-Stamping.

SUMMARY:

This law, this process, this concept ... is not a 'crime stopping' measure at all.  It is merely one more lame (albeit elegant) method by which local entities might logically impose draconian regulations on firearms ownership.

  1. These state-wide legal requirements would be so expensive for firearms manufacturers that no large-scale manufacturer would attempt to meet them.  It would increase the consumer cost from twice to ten-fold, or better, for each firearm.  It constitutes an embargo on the purchase of new firearms.
  2. This would accelerate  the Black Market of  'new' firearms, which would be purchased out-of-state and sold as "used" ... which would make criminals of honest citizens who only want to receive a reasonable value for their money; and at the drastically inflated of 'legitimate' new firearms, illegal firearms would become more attractive.
  3. The expense of supporting this quasi-registration would be disastrously expensive for the government.
  4. .. and it wouldn't be 'quasi-registration'; this would be impossible to support without REAL registration of firearms, which is contrary to the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution.  (But an exceedingly Liberal state, such as California, would probably get away with it!)
  5. .. which leads directly to Confiscation.  Does anyone doubt it?
  6. Governmental controls of replacement parts would required an entirely new level of Governmental Regulation and Control ... and that's expensive to every taxpayer in the state!
  7. It wouldn't work.   Stolen brass, stolen guns, stolen parts ... criminals intent on firearms violence would easily obfuscate law-enforcement efforts by leaving false clues.  Only Honest Citizens would be hampered by this new law.
Surely, someone in the state of California must realize that this is a 'feel good' law which will only serve the cause of Gun Control, not of Crime Detection.

Oh, wait!  I forgot .. this is California.

Never  mind.  In California, they aren't concerned with citizen's rights if the word "gun" is involved

Saturday, June 15, 2013

Sympathy For The Devil

Afghan doctor stoned for examining female patient without chaperone | Fox News:
A doctor was reportedly thrown from a balcony and stoned by an angry mob in Afghanistan for treating a female patient in an examining room without a chaperone. It’s not clear whether Dr. Ajmeer Hashimi was killed or severely injured and sent out of Afghanistan for medical attention, Afghan officials told the New York Times.
The female patient is reportedly in good condition at a women’s shelter. The assault occurred in Sar-i-Pul, a government-held town in the northern part of Afghanistan.
There are conflicting reports on the incident, but the provincial police chief, Abdul Raouf Taj told the Times that local villagers stormed a private clinic when they heard the doctor was treating the woman-- a midwife named Mahboba-- alone in his exam room.
Police arrived to escort the doctor and patient out of the office but while the woman was protected from serious attack, Hashimi was thrown from a second-floor balcony into the outraged crowd below and stoned, according to Nabila Rahimi, a local legal affairs official.
In many parts of Afghanistan women are customarily not allowed to be examined by male doctors unless a close male family member is present. Stoning is the punishment for adultery under Shariah law.
Taj said there was no indication that the victims’ relationship was anything other than professional.
Personal background note:
When I was sixteen, I dated a 15 year-old girl named Sheryl.  We were driving up and down main street ("Dragging The Gut") in my Daddy's 1962 Plymouth (ugliest car since the 1949 Studebaker!) and talking, when I mentioned something about "everybody has the right to go to hell in their own handbasket".

She shrilled:  "ARE you telling me to go to Hell!?"

She was just 15, I was 16, and I already knew there was no good answer to that question.

Two minutes later she told me she was dating another boy, George, who was driving his daddy's 1963 Plymouth (much prettier) and that she wanted me to marry her, because George had said he wanted to marry her but she liked me better.

I quite distinctly recall thinking at that moment:   WHY AM I HERE?

I took Sheryl home, and never saw here again.  (I later learned that she married George and they typically celebrated Saturday Nights by loud drunken fights, which sometimes included Sheryl throwing knives at George while he cowered behind a cutting board.)

George is, as far as I know, still trying to help Sheryl get over her Bi-Polar tendencies.

Psychologists call that "being an enabler".

Now, I just read this article about an Afghan being stoned for trying to help a patient.  I'm thinking about culture, you see, and how the culture that I consider reasonable isn't always shared by others, no matter how charming or friendly they may seem "most of the time some of the time when it suits their purpose".

I'm thinking about the American men and women serving their country in Afghanistan, and I realized I have the same question I first had in 1962:

WHY ARE WE THERE?

They are crazy people, they are offended if anyone calls them on their insanity, and the more we try to support them, the more they feel justified in treating us as if we are interlopers.

I was lucky that I got out of Sheryl's life early.  We've been in Afghan for how long?  And we're still trying to be "helpful"?

Psychologists call that "being an enabler".
Maybe we should just call it "being useful idiots".

They have an app for WHAT?

Durex creates vibrating underwear you can control via smartphone apps | VentureBeat:
Set aside the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s offer to reinvent the condom; Durex is conducting its own research and development — for underwear. 
The condom manufacturer unveiled its new “Fundawear” product yesterday, which is basically a set of undergarments (bras, panties, briefs, and such) that will vibrate whenever your partner decides you need some sexual attention. 
Oh, and you can control it from your smartphone — this sort of brings new meaning to the definition of “phone sex.” According to the demo video, the vibration sensors are supposed to mimic real human touch. You use the smartphone app to specify the portions of your partners body you’d like to stimulate, which are represented through circles on those body parts. When you touch those circles, it activates the underwear’s vibration sensors.

That does it: I'm turning in my new smartphone next week!

In the meantime, my phone number is ......

Cleveland police 137 rounds COF score: "2 mikes, 2 mikes ..."

Cleveland police punish 12 officers in deadly chase that ended in 137 rounds of gunfire | Fox News:

Cleveland police fired a sergeant and meted out demotions and suspensions Tuesday for a car chase last year that involved five dozen cruisers, 137 rounds of ammunition fired by 13 officers, and the death of two people who, it turned out, were probably unarmed.

A captain and lieutenant were demoted, and nine sergeants got suspensions ranging from one day to 30 days. They and the fired sergeant will appeal their punishment, according to Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 8, which represents police supervisors.

Dozens of cruisers became involved in the chase without permission from superiors and with little direction, according to a state report released earlier in the year. The episode damaged the department's relationship with residents and must be repaired, Chief Michael McGrath said at a news conference Tuesday.
Wow!  That sounds .... well, actually it sounds terribly familiar.

But first, more info on THIS story:

...  13 officers who fired their weapons as the chase ended in a blocked-off school parking lot in East Cleveland face a county grand jury investigating possible criminal wrongdoing.

The chase began around 10:30 p.m. when an officer thought he heard a gunshot from a car speeding by the police and courts complex in downtown Cleveland. A parking lot attendant thought it might have been a car backfire, a theory endorsed by the driver's family.
The officer jumped into his patrol car, made a U-turn and radioed for help.
The chase went through crowded residential neighborhoods, then reversed course, headed east onto busy Interstate 90 and through parts of Cleveland, and eventually into East Cleveland.

Then the gunfire erupted, 137 rounds. Driver Timothy Russell, 43, was shot 23 times and passenger Malissa Williams, 30, was shot 24 times.
The union has said the shootings were justified because the driver tried to ram an officer. No weapon or shell casings were found in the fleeing car.
Of the 276 officers on duty that evening, 104 were involved in some way in the chase. Sixty police cars were involved.
So let me see if I understand this:

In Cleveland (the city where both the river and the mayor's hair both caught fire in the 1980's) .. a cop THOUGHT he heard a shot, chased a fire and called for backup.  A total of 104 cops in 60 cop cars were involved.  "... 13 officers who fired their weapons as the chase ended in a blocked-off school parking lot in East Cleveland face a county grand jury investigating possible criminal wrongdoing."
Why?
Because both people in the car were killed: not just the driver who reportedly 'tried to ram an officer', but also the passenger who was obviously not involved in that reported assault on a police officer.  (She suffered one more hit than the Driver, apparently in the ".. and one to grow on ..." spirit of a Birthday Spanking; or maybe she just had her seat belt fastened and didn't fall down fast enough?)
Then the gunfire erupted, 137 rounds. Driver Timothy Russell, 43, was shot 23 times and passenger Malissa Williams, 30, was shot 24 times.
The union has said the shootings were justified because the driver tried to ram an officer. No weapon or shell casings were found in the fleeing car.
Emphasis added.  As if the police were not sufficiently emphatic.

Sounds a lot like  "Bonnie and Clyde" to me. 


Do the math: 23 + 24 =47 hits out of 137 shots fired .... all by the police, who were not under fire.
(What happened to the other 90 rounds?)

I'm afraid I cannot stand in support of Cleveland's "Boys in Blue";  I think these boys need to grow up before they swagger down the mean streets of Cleveland wearing a badge and a gun.
___________________

But wait ... there's more!

I said this sounded familiar, so I searched my own blog using the search argument "blue on blue", and I found this article I wrote in May 15, 2005:


That described a similar police debacle in which we reported:

On May 9, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LASD) in Compton attempted to shoot Moby Dick (a white SUV) which had been chased "at speeds approaching 35 mph", driven by a man who they considered a suspect in an earlier drive-by shooting. When the SUV appeared to be menacing the 10 patrolmen, they fired as many as 120 handgun rounds (according to early reports) at the Evil SUV. The results were:
  • the SUV was well and thoroughly ventilated.
  • the driver of the SUV was hit four times, in 'the extremities' (hand, arm, shoulder)
  • One deputy was hit by a bullet and knocked down; fortunately the bullet failed to penetrate his bullet-proof vest
  • several rounds hit houses in the immediate vicinity
  • Neighborhood residents stated "it sounded like a war!"
  • An investigation is being conducted to determine whether the police over-reacted.



That article was quickly  followed up on June 9, 2005 in an article called:

(.... a follow-up on the earlier article, see 120 rounds)
1:56 p.m. June 9, 2005
COMPTON – The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department will discipline 13 deputies for firing about 120 shots at an unarmed driver here last month, Sheriff Lee Baca announced Thursday. One deputy will be suspended for 15 days, others will be off duty for lesser periods and some will receive written reprimands, Baca said at a news conference at Compton City Hall.
The sheriff also praised the deputies, saying they "are dedicated and have great passion and concern for the people of Compton."
The announcement drew a mixed reaction.
Activist Morris Griffin hugged Baca after the news conference. "We never expected the police to police themselves," Griffin said.
But Lolitha Jones, who held a sign protesting the shooting, said deputies should have faced tougher measures.
"An ordinary citizen going down the street on a rampage like that would have gone straight to jail," she said.
Winston Hayes, 44, and a deputy were wounded in the May 9 shooting, which was captured on videotape. Deputies opened fire as Hayes's sport utility vehicle lurched forward and struck a patrol car. That followed a brief pursuit of Hayes, who deputies suspected of involvement in a previous shooting. It was later determined that he was not involved in the attack.
Hayes was hospitalized for about two weeks after being hit by four bullets and now faces charges of evading police and driving under the influence of drugs.
The deputy was hit by a round but only bruised.
The shooting spurred anger in the community, where bullets smashed through windows and hit house walls. Some deputies held a news conference to apologize.

Do we see a trend here?

When a lone gunman enters a shopping mall and shoots a couple of people, we call it a "Massacre" and immediately begin to propose new Gun Control Legislation.  There is no need for anyone to own a pistol;   if you feel you are in danger, just call the police.  They are trained law-enforcement officials and they alone can be trusted to responsibly carry a firearm.

You, the private citizen, would not have the training and experience to responsible carry a firearm.  If anything, you would probably panic in ... like ... a "Road Rage" citizen and end up shooting innocent people whose only crime was bad driving!

The evidence is clear: only policemen can be expected to responsibly carry a firearm ...

Unless they are gathered in groups of 13 or more.