Tuesday, May 10, 2016

THIS is what Hillary WANTS?

 Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump echoed conservative media and the National Rifle Association by baselessly claiming that Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton wants to “abolish the Second Amendment” and “take your guns away.”
In fact, Clinton says that Second Amendment rights can be "protected" while the government also implements"common-sense" measures like universal background checks to keep guns from dangerous people.
As usual, the Left Wing Media torques the rhetoric to make their "presumptive candidate" look good ;; at least, as good as she can be made, considering that she is (a) a politician, and (b) a DEMOCRATIC politician, and (c) ergo, a liar.

In point of fact, Hillary actually said:

You know, Australia’s a good example, Canada’s a good example, [and] the UK’s a good example. Why? Because each of them had mass killings, Australia had a huge mass killing about 20 or 25 years ago. Canada did as well, so did the UK. In reaction, they passed much stricter gun laws. In the Australian example, as I recall, that was a buyback program. The Australian government as part of trying to clamp down on the availability of…weapons offered a good price for buying hundreds of thousands of guns and basically clamped down going forward, in terms of having more of a background check approach–more of a permitting approach ...
[emphasis added]

The Australian Gun Control Law Banned and Confiscated Guns!

The Australian "Gun Buyback Program" wasn't presented as an option: it was mandatory.

Australians  complied because they were required to, by law.  They didn't do this because it was their choice!   And receiving $500 for a firearms which might have cost you thousands of dollars was not appreciated as "a good price".

(THIS is what Hillary wants?)

Reason Magazine noted that
As a result, concluded one academic assessment, "Suicide rates did not fall, though there was a shift toward less use of guns, continuing a very long-term decline. Homicides continued a modest decline; taking into account the one-time effect of the Port Arthur massacre itself, the share of murders committed with firearms declined sharply. Other violent crime, such as armed robbery, continued to increase, but again with fewer incidents that involved firearms."
The thing which DID decrease in Australia was that fewer (as in "NONE") of Australia's honest law-abiding citizens had the means to protect themselves against' violent felons .. felons who had NO problems acquiring firearms!

England has had fewer murders by firearms; however their rates of violent crime has soared because, again, criminals no longer feared The Armed Citizen.  Hell, you can't even use a kitchen knife in London to defend yourself against a home invasion!

So let's go back to the  original statement by the egregious JULIE ALDERMAN:


Hillary Clinton, the front-runner for the Democratic presidential nominee, wants "to take your bullets away." He made the remarks during a May 7 rally in Washington state, according to CNN. From the CNN report:
Julie Alderman called that "a lie" by Donald Trump.

But is it?
Not if you accept that Hillary was sincere when she embraced the Australian Example..

Let's go back to Australia, whose firearms laws are so cherished by The Hillary::

Who can possess ammunition?
Section 65(3) of the Firearms Act 1996 prescribes that:
A person must not possess ammunition unless the person is:
  1. The holder of a licence or permit to possess a firearm which takes that ammunition, or
  2. They are authorised to possess the ammunition by a permit.

What requirements must be met to purchase ammunition?

Sections 65 & 45A of the Firearms Act 1996 prescribe that ammunition for a firearm may only be sold to a person who produces at the time of the sale:
  1. Identification showing the name and address of the purchaser, and
  2. A current firearms licence or permit for a firearm that takes the type of ammunition being purchased, or
  3. A permit authorising the person to purchase the ammunition.

THIS is the model which Hillary Clinton thinks is "... a good example"?

(THIS is what Hillary wants?)

We're already revolted by the continuing trend toward Big Brother in California, but Hillary thinks this is a model which might be emulated in America?

The Difference between Australia and America:

There is no constitutional right in Australia to keep and bear arms.

There is a DRAMATIC difference between Australia and America.

Basically, Australia did not demand independence 200+ years ago; America did, and it forced the issue with arms .. which the British Occupiers had attempted to confiscate (leading to Lexington, Concord, "The Shot Heard Around The WORLD", etc.)

America was occupied by colonists, who wanted to come to The New World to establish a different form of existence and .. eventually, a different form of government.

Australia was occupied by criminals; it was a penal colony.  They were grateful as HELL for any little sign of freedom they could get; and they still, after 200 years, remain grateful for the crumbs of freedom which are occasionally cast their way by the Queen Mother.

(THIS is what Hillary wants?)

Bottom Line:

Essentially, Hillary (and the rest of the LibTards) want to reduce America to a colonial mentality, where the 'elected' leaders decide just which freedoms are made available to the hoi polloi .. and every opposing opinion is denigrated by the mindless flunkies who tout the Party Line and believe they are Original Thinkers ... and that you are paranoid.

"Nobody Wants To Take Your Guns Away!" they parrot.
But they would, if they could.
and 'they' (the 'American Subjects') also say:

"Revolution?  You Have A Pistol And The Government Has Bombers and F35 Attack Jets?

... as if a 'revolution' had to be violent.  It could be, but it need not be.

It's really very simple:   we only have to stand up for our rights. Your National Guard Neighbors will not shoot you for that.  (Well, they might try .. but I've seen their training!)
“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” ― Edmund Burke
(THIS is what Hilary wants?)


Anonymous said...

According to Hillary, there are no bad people, only bad guns.

MrApple said...

"America was occupied by colonists, who wanted to come to The New World to establish a different form of existence and .. eventually, a different form of government.

Australia was occupied by criminals; it was a penal colony."

>All that needs to be said.