When there's a Democratic administration, you get to write about a Saint; and when there's a Republican in the White House, you get to write about the asshole leading the country.
Either way, you have an eager readership just waiting to read (and agree with you) about whatever you have to say about the current administration!
Donald Trump’s Congressional Lackeys Are Threatening Washington D.C.’s Gun Laws:
Now proven largely correct, I’m willing to bet there’s one consequence to Donald Trump’s presidency that didn’t occur to you: For the first time in 40 years, due to the Republican Congress emboldened by a new president, guns might return to the streets of our nation’s capital en masse, no longer subject to the controls that have kept gun violence in check for decades.This is just one example about the opinions propounded in SlewsWeek;
The current administration is "permitting" Americans in DC to exercise their constitutional rights ... and it is A Bad Thing!
DC is "no longer subject to the controls that have kept gun violence in check for decades.
The District of Columbia has been among the top fifteen most lawless (in terms of "Gun Violence") cities in America for decades, but NewsWeek Magazine typifies it as a city which has kept " gun violence in check for decades."
This has been a town (?) which has been (in 13th place in the nation along with its sister city, Baltimore, in 4th place) so lawless that criminals, crooks, gang-bangers and other Bad Guys have been moving from Chicago (18th place) to the DC area just because they know they are less likely to be prosecuted for "gun violence" .. because DC wants so badly to maintain its (unlikely) image as a "violence free" place to live.
If it wasn't for all the armed body-guards protecting elected officials, there would be NO protection for "The Average Joe". All you have to do in DC to protect yourself is to have a half-dozen suits forming a protective circle around you; everyone else is assumed to be without protection, because NO GUNS ALLOWED!
The rest of the citizens have been advised to carry a five-dollar bill in their wallet, no credit cards, and to meekly "give it up" when confronted by muggers.
Where is the outrage?
Who can carry a gun? (Nobody, except armed, licensed "Security Guards" ... which the Average citizen cannot afford!)
Gun Control sucks. It keeps the criminals .. muggers, gang-bangers, etc. ... well armed and everyone else (who can't afford a hired bodyguard) without defense. Unless, of course, they're willing to "carry" even though it's a violation of the law, or perhaps if they are "privileged" to carry a firearm .. which means very few without "Political Influence".
Here's how you can get a Concealed Carry License in the District of Columbia:
The District of Columbia is a "May Issue" entity: you must have a permit to carry a firearm, but permits are rarely issued.
In Washington, D.C., all firearms must be registered with the police, by the terms of the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975.In a word: NO! "They cannot keep you from owning a firearm!"
The same law also prohibited the possession of handguns, even in private citizens' own homes, unless they were registered before 1976. However, the handgun ban was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 2008 case District of Columbia v. Heller. The Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment acknowledges and guarantees the right of the individual to possess and carry firearms, and therefore D.C.'s ban on handguns was unconstitutional.
SIDE COMMENTS ON PRESIDENTIAL SECURITY:
Surprisingly, Donald Trump doesn't have (published) the greatest number of bodyguards ... that honor apparently goes to Michael Bloomguard, whose six-man protective force earns in excess of $120,000 a year. Each.
So who is the most fearful/hated politician in the world?
Not The Donald?
No word on the Presidential Protective Team.
Betcha there are more, and better ... and we pay them (less) for their service.